Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Some Of RM1.9bil Credited Into Najib’s Account, A Donation From Saudi Arabia, Court Told

views
     
SUSmac60931
post May 14 2019, 06:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2019
QUOTE(dickybird @ May 14 2019, 06:01 PM)
You forgot that they can be both ?
*
So you are saying the High Court can be both? Got it. Time to report to MCMC.
ConstantLove
post May 14 2019, 06:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(skyforcerld @ May 14 2019, 05:03 PM)
It is written at SPRM website. Gov official cannot accept gift > RM500.

Habis cerita.

And my tenant donate money to me every month while i let him stay for free.

Winrar!
*
and my 'friend' donate money to me every month while i let him use my car for free

and my 'friend' donate money to me every month while i supply him free goods




every business use 'donate', then no need pay tax lo?
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 06:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(oucheev @ May 14 2019, 04:58 PM)
I don't think she's lying. She's merely saying what is stated in the instruction. It is not her duty to verify the source of the money. Her duty is to follow the account holder instruction and also because the amount is huge highlight to BNM.
*
Spot on and she has no reason either otherwise it wouldn't match the money trail either.

Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 06:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(ConstantLove @ May 14 2019, 06:08 PM)
and my 'friend' donate money to me every month while i let him use my car for free

and my 'friend' donate money to me every month while i supply him free goods
every business use 'donate', then no need pay tax lo?
*
That "donation" from your friend is taxable.
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 06:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(ZeaXG @ May 14 2019, 05:08 PM)
Aiya, Najib cakap the money is from Faisal, then the bank mai recorded the money as from Faisal lo. I don't think the bank so canggih can trace the source of the money from its original source. It takes an entire supply chain to cooperate and be transparent. When it comes to international remittances, it is impossible to have transparency.

So, this report is also misleading. The source as donation from Faisal comes from Najib's own reason given to the bank, not the Bank's own investigation. Based on my understanding of banking operations la.
*
Incorrect.
SUSHonya
post May 14 2019, 06:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
Do-net sound like Ko-net!

Bosslu must be fooling us!
ConstantLove
post May 14 2019, 06:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
234 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(Roman Catholic @ May 14 2019, 06:12 PM)
That "donation" from your friend is taxable.
*
thanks. i hope jib kor paid tax biggrin.gif
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 06:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(arubin @ May 14 2019, 05:03 PM)
Erm, I don't think there are enough details here.

What is it now? She knows for certain cos the bank did a check to see if it really was from Prince Faisal?

Or it was merely from Najib's letter of instruction that she knows its from a Prince?

Which is it?

Which cacat reporter dunno how to write until something like this is not clear?
*
When monies are wired from overseas there a code with necessary details even the senders name. If there's any supporting documents it should be at he transmitting bank as well. Any letters produced locally to substantiate the reason holds no water.

So you can safely omit the second one.
dickybird
post May 14 2019, 06:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,093 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(mac60931 @ May 14 2019, 06:06 PM)
So you are saying the High Court can be both? Got it. Time to report to MCMC.
*
Lol
You mentioned the high court, I did not.
Hello MCMC.
pikacu
post May 14 2019, 06:29 PM

male tag rosak
*******
Senior Member
7,740 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Some Yih


darthboyzzee datang lagi dengan tered backfired pastu menyorok
MICKEYB
post May 14 2019, 06:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
Just lawyers twisting the facts as usual.

There are corrupt banks all over the world (the few that were shutdown due to 1MDB is simple enough proof). Anyone could have wired the cash, and used a fake name or position to make it look legitimate with the proper leverage.

The question is, why did not BNM flag the transaction, and was there already prior instructions given to BNM for the transaction to find its way to AmBank without proper paperwork?

The bank officer is answering questions based on facts she is aware of. The money 'originated' from someone named Price Faisal, as per the transfer order. She can't answer more then the actual facts that she is aware of.
submergedx
post May 14 2019, 06:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,126 posts

Joined: Jun 2015
QUOTE(mac60931 @ May 14 2019, 05:02 PM)
Are you sure it's not her job to verify that?
Wait, I am confused. Are we talking about the 2.6 bill or 1.9 bill?
*
This is SRC case, 1MDB belum datang lagi.
oucheev
post May 14 2019, 06:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Mickey B @ May 14 2019, 06:30 PM)
Just lawyers twisting the facts as usual.

There are corrupt banks all over the world (the few that were shutdown due to 1MDB is simple enough proof). Anyone could have wired the cash, and used a fake name or position to make it look legitimate with the proper leverage.

The question is, why did not BNM flag the transaction, and was there already prior instructions given to BNM for the transaction to find its way to AmBank without proper paperwork?

The bank officer is answering questions based on facts she is aware of. The money 'originated' from someone named Price Faisal, as per the transfer order. She can't answer more then the actual facts that she is aware of.
*
I think BNM took action against Ambank and fined Ambank according to the powers of BNM. However, BNM does not have the power to go after the individual in the accounts as it is beyond their jurisdiction. However, the AG has the power to go after the individual but he together with BNM governor were forced to go for early retirement.
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 07:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(Mickey B @ May 14 2019, 06:30 PM)
Just lawyers twisting the facts as usual.

There are corrupt banks all over the world (the few that were shutdown due to 1MDB is simple enough proof). Anyone could have wired the cash, and used a fake name or position to make it look legitimate with the proper leverage.

The question is, why did not BNM flag the transaction, and was there already prior instructions given to BNM for the transaction to find its way to AmBank without proper paperwork?

The bank officer is answering questions based on facts she is aware of. The money 'originated' from someone named Price Faisal, as per the transfer order. She can't answer more then the actual facts that she is aware of.
*
No matter what how legitimate it may be made to look, only with a proper detailed investigation into this worldwide money trail will it be able to expose everything for all to see.
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 07:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(oucheev @ May 14 2019, 06:41 PM)
I think BNM took action against Ambank and fined Ambank according to the powers of BNM. However, BNM does not have the power to go after the individual in the accounts as it is beyond their jurisdiction. However, the AG has the power to go after the individual but he together with BNM governor were forced to go for early retirement.
*
Those were very frightening times indeed, just a small misstep and that would costs one's life.
silent_stalker
post May 14 2019, 07:47 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Apr 2012


QUOTE(skyforcerld @ May 14 2019, 05:03 PM)
It is written at SPRM website. Gov official cannot accept gift > RM500.

Habis cerita.

And my tenant donate money to me every month while i let him stay for free.

Winrar!
*
It is argued that gov administrator do not follow the rules applied to gov servants.
Roman Catholic
post May 14 2019, 07:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Feb 2017

QUOTE(silent_stalker @ May 14 2019, 07:47 PM)
It is argued that gov administrator do not follow the rules applied to gov servants.
*
I think this has been proven in the court too, if I am not mistaken.
unknown warrior
post May 14 2019, 07:51 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
mac60931 writes for najip.

I would think it is rubbish to say a prime minister is not a Govt official.

This post has been edited by unknown warrior: May 14 2019, 07:55 PM
Currylaksa
post May 14 2019, 07:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,616 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(pokolinou @ May 14 2019, 05:58 PM)
I'm not saying he/she is but what if he/she do defend jibbie? You angry? You feel like your soul was stolen?
*
Souls don't exist but yeah I'd be angry. He stole so much money from us.
silent_stalker
post May 14 2019, 08:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Apr 2012


QUOTE(unknown warrior @ May 14 2019, 07:51 PM)
mac60931 writes for najip.

I would think it is rubbish to say a prime minister is not a Govt official.
*
From what i know, gov administrator is not employed by the gov. The PM is chosen by parliament n the ministers in chosen by PM. So, thats why they cant be considered as gov officials. Gov officials represent the gov, gov administrator represent the country.

Thats the argument la.

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0170sec    0.52    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:39 PM