QUOTE(dx_myrddraal @ Feb 14 2008, 02:41 PM)
gogo2 was replying to someone else. Here's my take: you should not be asking others what gear to buy: wide, tele, portrait or flash - it's all up to you! Nobody knows what photography you enjoy more than you yourself! If you travel a lot, wide angles will be most useful, followed by a tele lens (I think). If you like shooting indoors (perhaps you party all the time), then the kit 75-300 is pretty much useless - a 50mm f1.7 will definitely be useful. Flash? If you do landscapes, it'll be pretty useless. So ask yourself what kinda photos you wanna take more often.
That's b***s***!! Everyone has the right to enjoy photoraphy, regardless of their budgets!! Why else are there 400D, D40 and A200s on the market?! Canon is a firm believer in that - provding a wide variety of lenses for people with different budgets. Eg: Canon's 50mm primes come in f1.8, f1.4 USM and f1.2 USM L versions, depending how deep your pocket is. I'm sorry if your interest is solely in wildlife and sports photography - can't help you with that.
Not everyone will be willing to fork out RM1k for the Sony 50mm f1.4 over the Minolta f1.7. It's just a blardy 0.3 - that alone is not gonna make your pictures pop. Do a search on Flickr and you can see plenty of impressive pictures taken with a RM 250-350 piece of plastic toy, otherwise known as the Canon 50mm f1.8. But of course, if you shoot a lot of portraits and if you can afford it, why not?
That's true. Only the buyer can determine what they want

. But sometimes, buyers do not know what they want
until they try to shoot the bird or monkey up the tree. Then only they realise, OMG, I forgot to buy 75-300...

Yes, picture from 1.8 to 1.4 will not pop. But I think in indoor, you might appreciate a little bit more.