QUOTE(akachester @ Jun 27 2007, 10:05 AM)
One thing for sure, more people knows Intel more than AMD. Intel's advertising is everywhere while AMD ones are lacking. Try to ask those people that do not know much about PC Hardwares and when they wanted to get a new rig, they will ask for Intel straight away.
I tried checking with my dad before about building a PC and he insist getting Intel. When i told him about AMD, he was like blurred on how trustable the brand is due to the lack of advertising available.
Anyway, in general comparison and normal usage, i really doubt anyone can feel major difference between the low end models like X2 3600 with E2140. Benchmarking wise, ok, there are differences. Other than that, i felt that it is negligible. For budget concise people who do not have any extra to spend (aka, its RM250 FIRM on a proc), getting an AMD is not a bad idea anyway. Somehow, its better than what you think and the difference between both C2D and X2 is almost unoticeable.
What makes people worried is that when they ask, people will say, go C2D. They are better. How much better is not mention in any sort of way and people would start having an assumption of C2D is WAYYYYYYYYYYYY better than X2 in cases.
Else, if your budget are expendable, going C2D aint bad either. In a case IF you decided to learn about OCing in the future, its a good choice of having a proc that are ready to do the job very well indeed. Anyhow, it is not good bashing AMD with those crucial statements. Wait till AMD regain their crown and people will bash Intel again. With current price war, consider yourself ready for a good purchase of any procs available around...
Fantastic reply. That's a very matured one. The advertising matters most. Like Pepsi vs Coca-Cola, M-16 vs AK-47, which car vs which car and the stuff like that. I tried checking with my dad before about building a PC and he insist getting Intel. When i told him about AMD, he was like blurred on how trustable the brand is due to the lack of advertising available.
Anyway, in general comparison and normal usage, i really doubt anyone can feel major difference between the low end models like X2 3600 with E2140. Benchmarking wise, ok, there are differences. Other than that, i felt that it is negligible. For budget concise people who do not have any extra to spend (aka, its RM250 FIRM on a proc), getting an AMD is not a bad idea anyway. Somehow, its better than what you think and the difference between both C2D and X2 is almost unoticeable.
What makes people worried is that when they ask, people will say, go C2D. They are better. How much better is not mention in any sort of way and people would start having an assumption of C2D is WAYYYYYYYYYYYY better than X2 in cases.
Else, if your budget are expendable, going C2D aint bad either. In a case IF you decided to learn about OCing in the future, its a good choice of having a proc that are ready to do the job very well indeed. Anyhow, it is not good bashing AMD with those crucial statements. Wait till AMD regain their crown and people will bash Intel again. With current price war, consider yourself ready for a good purchase of any procs available around...
I found new Celerons (4xx) series and they are very superb! 800MHz FSB, 512K cache and also using Core's architectures. Maybe it'll really beat up the fastest S.478 P4 and even the Prescotts.
Jun 28 2007, 01:13 PM

Quote
0.0165sec
0.48
5 queries
GZIP Disabled