QUOTE(8cr13mov @ Jan 7 2019, 03:56 PM)
yes it did
but he never justified the assault because the owner is not muslim
that's ktards tendency to not read
he just played along with it
it's substance over form....if he want to highlight the owner is not muslim, he does not need to link it to the waiter kena assault.
plus, all his reply, he blame it on owner not muslim, instead of whether the restaurant is halal or not....
and, many ktard had pointed to him, including myself, it doesn't matters if the restaurant own by who, so long it is a halal restaurant, it can be consume by muslim. But, he is claiming once muslim saw some jawi religious words and masjid or mekah kaabah, it mean muslim restaurant.
which I had also pointed out to him, it is halal certification that determine whether muslim that restaurant suitable for muslim or not, not some jawi religious words or masjid or whatsoever, unless he trying to tell everyone that muslim in Malaysia so easily confused and cheated, their religious upbringing so low, which I even a non muslim does not believe it.
then, he try to twist it say, halal certification take time to obtain, in meantime, usage of jawi praising Allah or mekah peckture justified it. However, I do agree with some of his point, that using religion to sell is morally incorrect. But, not legally wrong either, it is a learned muslim use their own judgement to decide whether the restaurant is suitable for them or not, not just relying just by some peckture or words.