QUOTE(xxboxx @ Sep 6 2018, 10:52 AM)
I read somewhere the tech guy say make sure have hardware raid controller, if just software raid it is too unreliable. How true is that?
you should ask amazon, google, oracle, as to why they almost exclusively use software RAID generally yes, but in the computing world, you can't really use "generally" la.
the thing about hardware raid is that hardwares fail all the time, especially in enterprise situations. performance also are limited to the chips that are present, some are super fast (and super expensive, especially if it uses some proprietary battery), some are inconsistent (still needs SSD as cache, and that also tengok pada the type of SSD u got, AND hopefully your OS/NAS got the driver for it), and some are just fake hardware RAID that depends on your processor (like software RAID).
only major advantage is that it has memory built-in that stores your currently-used data if suddenly no power. software RAID solves this somewhat by leveraging on your RAM and CPU.
rule of thumb: if you're willing to spend thousands for a hardware raid card, and don't mind paying hundreds more for a fresh new battery for it, and can guarantee your OS got the drivers, then go for it.
rule of thumb #2: if you plan on using only SSDs for your NAS and demand max performance, get a hardware raid (since you've already spend tens of thousands for the SSDs anyway, so the total cost of ownership after adding hardware RAID isn't that much extra), or get a fast CPU.
in this case, ZFS, Synology RAID, Linux MD RAID is far superior overall. flexibility and free alone makes it much better than hardware RAID. dulu2 yes la hardware card is needed. ZFS was built because of the limitations and problems of hardware RAID after all.
in 2018:
H/ware RAID: not use in enterprise or data center anymore
S/ware RAID: used from your laptop to enterprise and data centers
Sep 6 2018, 03:37 PM

Quote
0.0173sec
0.78
5 queries
GZIP Disabled