which system do you recommend for stability, Intel or AMD. Planning to run 2-3 GPUs nonstop compute and at times I would leave the computer to let it run. Only consumer system cos I don't need crazy stable with ECC ram like that. Thank you.

what do you mean by weird for the z390 and z490?

but if picking 10600k that don't oc much won't need very robust vrm right? or stock 10700f

what happens when ryzen zen 2 have stability issues?

It happens on even stock settings? never knew ryzen had this kind of issues on the latest gen, I thought it was only the first gen ryzens.

My only experience with stability is my geforce cards are so much more stable and have less issues than when I had radeon cards (r9 290,hd7870 etc).

My current intel system although mixed breed with unoptimal parts, it doesn't have much stability issues.

Wow thank you sifu, you just saved me potential headache in the future. I need a stable system for the things I'm planning to run
Maybe I'll just get a 10400f and msi b460 mortar, or 10600k & msi z490 A-Pro, I want to run 2 gpus for compute. Then see what the future holds for zen 3 and next gen intel.

This post has been edited by terradrive: Sep 1 2020, 08:11 PM

YEAHHHHH RTX3080 $699 YAY

MY GOD RTX3070 $499

This post has been edited by terradrive: Sep 2 2020, 12:32 AM

I'm considering RTX3080 ady haha

They put bigger gap in performance between 3070 and 3080 now vs 2070 and 2080, but 3080 and 3090 is much closer now.

This post has been edited by terradrive: Sep 2 2020, 12:43 AM

3070 is $499 leh

RTX3070 is basically 2/3 of RTX3080 except the VRAM

even custom cards?

3070 and 3080 using different chips, 104 vs 102.

seems like nvidia trying to push more units of rtx3080 even though cannibalizing 3090's sales.

30TFlops shaders, wonder how fast it can run cuda apps now

This post has been edited by terradrive: Sep 2 2020, 12:59 AM

yeah, previously 2080 isn't that much faster than 2070 (then smaller gap between 2080 super and 2070 super) so ppl picked 2070/2070 super over 2080/2080super. Now they are salvaging the inferior chips of 102 to make a better 80 series card, to make people skip over the 3070. But now 3080 and 3090's performance is too close, so they put 24GB on 3090, probably for rich people or people that needed the big ass VRAM for compute apps like 3d rendering (no need very expensive pro cards for certain apps)

I seriously think even 10900k will bottleneck the 3080 on current game engines, so the fps advantage might not be high, only visible on 4K probably

DLSS also means more cou bottleneck on current cpu gen.

but many big titles have dlss, makes the fps even higher lol
4K reso but rendered with 1440p. My 1440p monitor will render at 1080p.
pcie gen4 data direct to gpu now, fuh fast loading times

Holy moly

Kinda glad that PCI-E didn't seriously bottleneck the performance of RTX3080, and 10900k OC can still show the strength of the RTX3080.

meaning? they mentioned the platform it was on

ya, thats why i mentioned good thing the 10900k still can drive the rtx3080 fine even on pci-e 3.0

curious to try out nvidia reflex too, since i already have a gsync monitor

Aw if you are from sabah I would take one asap for rm2k, I mean like today COD LOL

nvidia recommends 650watts for RTX3070 and 750watts for RTX3080 and RTX3090, but their footnote mentioned power supply recommendation based on i9 10900k system