Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> If Singapore & Malaysia go war, which country win?

views
     
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM, updated 8y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

If Malaysia invades, Singapore will win.

Malaysia doesn’t have the ability to launch large scale invasions. It announced in 2013 (amid the backdrop of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS) that it wanted to establish a marine corps to have that ability but no further news was heard since. Singapore is close enough to Malaysia that you don’t need a marine corps to invade the island, however a successful invasion still depends largely on attaining air superiority or at least air parity over the beachhead. Malaysia has a mix of relatively modern SU-30MKM, F-18 and MiG-29N fighter jets with a respectable arsenal of both Russian and American modern missiles to support an invasion force of assault boats and landing craft. However they are all stationed in the northern region of Malaysia and Singapore has airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircrafts in addition to reconnaissance UAV assets constantly patrolling its airspace in addition to ground radars (and possibly satellites) to prevent the possibility of being sneaked upon by hostile aircrafts and massed military assets at its doorstep.

Further, there are US aircraft carriers calling Singapore’s ports frequently and even the US Navy’s newest Littoral Combat Ships are stationed there on a long term basis[1]. You don’t go and rob a restaurant when there’s a heavyweight wrestler dining there and who’s friends with the owner.

Conversely if Singapore invades, Malaysia will win.

It’s an open secret that Singapore has the capability and specifically trains for an assault into Johor with a so-called Mersing Line as a target to reach and hold in order to have the water pumping stations in Skudai and Kota Tinggi well secured and beyond range of weapons such as the Astros II MLRS or 155mm howitzers. Malaysia may not be as well equipped militarily as Singapore but it has the ability to trade space for time. It knows it can’t win a war head-on with the Singapore Armed Forces and hence wouldn’t engage directly. Instead it will engage in guerilla warfare and jungle warfare with Singapore’s conscript army who are more familiar with the layout of their shopping malls rather than the Malaysian jungles. A conscript army engaged externally also means that Singapore’s economy will ground to a halt due to missing manpower if sanctions by other countries doesn’t cripple the country in two weeks to a month’s time. So if Singapore were actually on the defensive and doesn’t go beyond the Mersing Line, it’s logistics line should be manageable as per drawer plans but the further it goes beyond it the more it will be stretched and be vulnerable to guerrilla tactics by Malaysia. Not to mention it’ll have to deal with more captured ‘POW’ and civilians. They need to be kept under control, fed and taken care of. It’ll be a huge logistical burden on Singapore’s manpower and a burden that their premium war-fighting equipment isn’t actually designed to deal with.

Now if purely for the sake of this question the two armies goes for a mindless all out battle, then Singapore with more personnel that it can muster and more and better critical equipment will win:

Personnel:-

Active: SG (72,000) - MY (110,000)
Reserve: SG (1,386,000) - MY (296,000)

Army:-

Main Battle Tanks: SG (196, German Leopard 2s) - MY (48, Polish PT91Ms)
Light Tanks: SG (?? AMX-13 replacement) - MY (26, UK Scorpions)
Armored Fighting Vehicles: SG (2k+ various models) - MY (1k+ various models)
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems: SG (18 HIMARS) - MY (36, Astros II Launchers)
Self Propelled Howitzers: SG (48) - MY (0)

Air Force:-

Fighter Jets: SG (127 F-15, F-16, F-5s) - MY (75 SU-30MKM, F-18, MiG29N, BAE Hawks, F5s)
AEW&Cs: SG (4 Gulfstream 550s) - MY (0)
Attack Helicopters: SG (17 Apaches) - MY (0)

Navy:-

Frigates: SG (6, Formidable Class) - MY (2, Lekiu CLass)
Corvettes: SG (6, Victory Class) - MY (6, Kasturi & Laksamana Class)
Patrol Vessels: SG (11, Fearless Class) - MY (6, Kedah Class)
Submarines: SG (4) - MY (2)
Amphibious Ships: SG (4, Endurance LST) - MY (2, KD Seri Indera Sakti & KD Mahawangsa)

Footnotes
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
Zot
post Mar 14 2018, 08:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
7,938 posts

Joined: Mar 2014
Indon
Timemuffin
post Mar 14 2018, 08:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
98 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
no brainer.

msia

nothing can stop a swarm of mat rempits
zimhibikie
post Mar 14 2018, 08:41 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


hope the mods will delete this 'us vs them war' kinda threads..
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 08:42 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
Of coz malaysia win la.

Sinkapore army full of sissy. Confirm will run away from the battle.
patnam
post Mar 14 2018, 08:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


why dun make it Asean war
Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei vs Singapore, Thailand, Phillipines, Vietnam
TreyLey
post Mar 14 2018, 08:52 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
370 posts

Joined: Mar 2011

if china invade both lose
SUSVoidDance
post Mar 14 2018, 08:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Mar 2017
Depend on whether they (sg) can find enough bags carrier or not.
P_$layer_123
post Mar 14 2018, 08:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


Thailand will win, economically and militarily..

We all busy fighting down south, they will roll down from the north.
SUSAllnGap
post Mar 14 2018, 08:54 AM

[ Modding with Passion(tm) ]
*******
Senior Member
4,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penangites



QUOTE(fadzly @ Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM)
Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

If Malaysia invades, Singapore will win.

Malaysia doesn’t have the ability to launch large scale invasions. It announced in 2013 (amid the backdrop of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS) that it wanted to establish a marine corps to have that ability but no further news was heard since. Singapore is close enough to Malaysia that you don’t need a marine corps to invade the island, however a successful invasion still depends largely on attaining air superiority or at least air parity over the beachhead. Malaysia has a mix of relatively modern SU-30MKM, F-18 and MiG-29N fighter jets with a respectable arsenal of both Russian and American modern missiles to support an invasion force of assault boats and landing craft. However they are all stationed in the northern region of Malaysia and Singapore has airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircrafts in addition to reconnaissance UAV assets constantly patrolling its airspace in addition to ground radars (and possibly satellites) to prevent the possibility of being sneaked upon by hostile aircrafts and massed military assets at its doorstep.

Further, there are US aircraft carriers calling Singapore’s ports frequently and even the US Navy’s newest Littoral Combat Ships are stationed there on a long term basis[1]. You don’t go and rob a restaurant when there’s a heavyweight wrestler dining there and who’s friends with the owner.

Conversely if Singapore invades, Malaysia will win.

It’s an open secret that Singapore has the capability and specifically trains for an assault into Johor with a so-called Mersing Line as a target to reach and hold in order to have the water pumping stations in Skudai and Kota Tinggi well secured and beyond range of weapons such as the Astros II MLRS or 155mm howitzers. Malaysia may not be as well equipped militarily as Singapore but it has the ability to trade space for time. It knows it can’t win a war head-on with the Singapore Armed Forces and hence wouldn’t engage directly. Instead it will engage in guerilla warfare and jungle warfare with Singapore’s conscript army who are more familiar with the layout of their shopping malls rather than the Malaysian jungles. A conscript army engaged externally also means that Singapore’s economy will ground to a halt due to missing manpower if sanctions by other countries doesn’t cripple the country in two weeks to a month’s time. So if Singapore were actually on the defensive and doesn’t go beyond the Mersing Line, it’s logistics line should be manageable as per drawer plans but the further it goes beyond it the more it will be stretched and be vulnerable to guerrilla tactics by Malaysia. Not to mention it’ll have to deal with more captured ‘POW’ and civilians. They need to be kept under control, fed and taken care of. It’ll be a huge logistical burden on Singapore’s manpower and a burden that their premium war-fighting equipment isn’t actually designed to deal with.

Now if purely for the sake of this question the two armies goes for a mindless all out battle, then Singapore with more personnel that it can muster and more and better critical equipment will win:

Personnel:-

Active: SG (72,000) - MY (110,000)
Reserve: SG (1,386,000) - MY (296,000)

Army:-

Main Battle Tanks: SG (196, German Leopard 2s) - MY (48, Polish PT91Ms)
Light Tanks: SG (?? AMX-13 replacement) - MY (26, UK Scorpions)
Armored Fighting Vehicles: SG (2k+ various models) - MY (1k+ various models)
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems: SG (18 HIMARS) - MY (36, Astros II Launchers)
Self Propelled Howitzers: SG (48) - MY (0)

Air Force:-

Fighter Jets: SG (127 F-15, F-16, F-5s) - MY (75 SU-30MKM, F-18, MiG29N, BAE Hawks, F5s)
AEW&Cs: SG (4 Gulfstream 550s) - MY (0)
Attack Helicopters: SG (17 Apaches) - MY (0)

Navy:-

Frigates: SG (6, Formidable Class) - MY (2, Lekiu CLass)
Corvettes: SG (6, Victory Class) - MY (6, Kasturi & Laksamana Class)
Patrol Vessels: SG (11, Fearless Class) - MY (6, Kedah Class)
Submarines: SG (4) - MY (2)
Amphibious Ships: SG (4, Endurance LST) - MY (2, KD Seri Indera Sakti & KD Mahawangsa)

Footnotes
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
*
on the side note, politicians wont wanna burn down own bank accounts across the borders.

there are too much songlap money parked in Sg btw
cicak.fakir
post Mar 14 2018, 08:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
387 posts

Joined: May 2016
who have the most number of aweks and amois and - never mind - , will win the war by tying down the soldiers.
lakini80
post Mar 14 2018, 08:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
334 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Waste of time
Mr_47
post Mar 14 2018, 08:57 AM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



in kopitiam?

send najib sure bankrap one
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 09:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


Malaysia submarines boleh guna already?
popopi
post Mar 14 2018, 09:03 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,197 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


tot malaysia jet no engine,, and the submarine cannot submerge 1?
melt
post Mar 14 2018, 09:04 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


one kerismudin can defeat all the tanks, ship and the army
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 09:04 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 14 2018, 09:02 AM)
Malaysia submarines boleh guna already?
*
Pm me...tq
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:05 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
Just stop the wayer supply from Johor. All sinkie will die in a week. No need war.
Lada Putih
post Mar 14 2018, 09:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
regardless who attack or invade
SG will win
Malaysia will get a political reboot
malaysian ppl will get it worst then before
slaveone
post Mar 14 2018, 09:06 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,231 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
china
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 09:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 09:05 AM)
Just stop the wayer supply from Johor. All sinkie will die in a week. No need war.
*
Sg ada new water...
someomore whole marina area from saltwater become a reservoir catchment area already.

Sinki look far and plan ahead.
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 14 2018, 09:07 AM)
Sg ada new water...
someomore whole marina area from saltwater become a reservoir catchment area already.

Sinki look far and plan ahead.
*
But can ony supply 10% only. 90% still from malaysia.
arinpsycho
post Mar 14 2018, 09:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
everytime there is war both side will lose in terms of economies
SUSEdBaaBaa
post Mar 14 2018, 09:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 09:09 AM)
But can ony supply 10% only.  90% still from malaysia.
*
Sure ke,?

I remember reading somewhere b4 that Sg has water self-sufficiency already, although still keeping terms of water contract bcos cheaper.

This post has been edited by EdBaaBaa: Mar 14 2018, 09:14 AM
nelienuxe_sara
post Mar 14 2018, 09:15 AM

noob im ur father
*******
Senior Member
2,546 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: far far away...
why the eff u like to have a war?
SUSMarioKart
post Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
22 posts

Joined: Dec 2017


Bodoh. No need airplanes to invade Singapore.

We will just send 5 million Bangla to invade Singapore to overrun it.

You never play as Zergs in Starcraft?
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(EdBaaBaa @ Mar 14 2018, 09:13 AM)
Sure ke,?

I remember reading somewhere b4 that Sg has water self-sufficiency already,  although still keeping terms of water contract bcos cheaper.
*
Yes. If not our amy need only to bomb their distilled water plant. They will slowly die for sure.
SUSYellowKingValley
post Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
398 posts

Joined: Dec 2014
Indo win.
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 09:09 AM)
But can ony supply 10% only.  90% still from malaysia.
*
Because its cheaper to buy raw water from Malaysia and then treat and sell it back. If malaysia tutup when in war or dispute, they will use the water supply they have.

Sg sell water to Malaysia also.... doh.gif


QUOTE
Singapore has started supplying an additional six million gallons of water per day to Malaysia.

This comes after Johor's water regulatory body Badan Kawalselia Air Johor (Bakaj) made an "urgent request" on Saturday to national water agency PUB, asking for an additional supply of treated water.

"Bakaj requires this water to stabilise its own supply system in Johor Baru after a shutdown on Wednesday, due to pollution in the Johor River," said PUB in a statement yesterday.

The agency added that it started supplying the additional amount of water yesterday and the arrangement will carry on until tomorrow. The extra amount of treated water is being supplied by the PUB-operated Johor River Waterworks.

The latest arrangement, however, will not affect Singapore's own water supply as the agency is able to increase its own local production at short notice, said PUB.

This means getting more water from desalination plants here, as well as reservoirs, to ensure that Singapore's water needs are met.

PUB is entitled to draw 250 million gallons of raw water daily from the Johor River under the 1962 Water Agreement with Malaysia, which expires in 2061.

SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:19 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(MarioKart @ Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM)
Bodoh. No need airplanes to invade Singapore.

We will just send 5 million Bangla to invade Singapore to overrun it.

You never play as Zergs in Starcraft?
*
5 million bangla? Syit. That is the most scary weapon to be used.
cckkpr
post Mar 14 2018, 09:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,516 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
We will not win becoz we are richer and scared to die. We songlap so much money, who wants to fight?
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 09:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 09:17 AM)
Yes. If not our amy need only to bomb their distilled water plant. They will slowly die for sure.
*
that is why they have Mersing line and air superiority to ensure you cant reach their critical location. if can bomb their plant, can bomb the whole island already.
Benefon
post Mar 14 2018, 09:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,800 posts

Joined: Mar 2017


Bodo
KZ2012
post Mar 14 2018, 09:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Why would Malay attacked another Malay country?
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:25 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 14 2018, 09:20 AM)
that is why they have Mersing line and air superiority to ensure you cant reach their critical location. if can bomb their plant, can bomb the whole island already.
*
Sinkypore is so small and fragile. They bought many and advance weapon also no use. Malaysia or indon kasi hantam a few bomb sure koyak already.
danielmckey
post Mar 14 2018, 09:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Jan 2008

No one will win. We can only bury dead people.
SUSjoe_star
post Mar 14 2018, 09:25 AM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
Sg army will win

As long as their soldiers allowed to bring maid to carry their gear
happyking4ever
post Mar 14 2018, 09:26 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
354 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
post question, then sendiri answer doh.gif
nonsensezzz
post Mar 14 2018, 09:27 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
16 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: PEN-KUL-JHB


Both can't win if one invade one another. Because both are defensive countries, not offensive.


Wait, singapore is defensive country or not?
ahpoo
post Mar 14 2018, 09:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
From: money-sa advanced


msia win easy....most sinki will balik prc or australia cause sissy...msia n where to go...die die must fight for country...unless ehmm ehmm...
bereev
post Mar 14 2018, 09:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
257 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
tak habis habis this kind of question , we will not in war because we are not a nation like middle east
bereev
post Mar 14 2018, 09:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
257 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
QUOTE(nonsensezzz @ Mar 14 2018, 09:27 AM)
Both can't win if one invade one another. Because both are defensive countries, not offensive.
Wait, singapore is defensive country or not?
*
yes, they even park many jet at others country far until New Zealand and US
poooky
post Mar 14 2018, 09:34 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
844 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
Sg only got 1 shot of premtive strike becos long time is still an island nations that depend heavily on imports. Even we partially blockade morale of SG plummet. Assuming SG dun activate Gundam.
acbc
post Mar 14 2018, 09:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,048 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Aiya.

MY only need to cut water and food supply. Everyone on the island will starve to death. No need to bomb here and there. Expensive.
Ahsin1987
post Mar 14 2018, 09:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
SG, because they already hired all Malaysian as soldiers.
jerm57
post Mar 14 2018, 09:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
405 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Penis ular Bolehland


The mat rempits will blot out the sun!!
SUSweyyt
post Mar 14 2018, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 09:05 AM)
Just stop the wayer supply from Johor. All sinkie will die in a week. No need war.
*
Lol 2018 still think sinkapork rely on johor water.

U think they build the marina barrage for fun?
kcchong2000
post Mar 14 2018, 09:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Cut off water supply then play defense. singapore will die. Bomb their water supply cable from other country. Done

Simple.

This post has been edited by kcchong2000: Mar 14 2018, 09:37 AM
Frozen_Sun
post Mar 14 2018, 09:43 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
One thing for certain...SG will be able to have air superiority over its territory, or even the whole semenanjung. It will be bloody to assault SG directly from JB. But MY troops can fire harassing fire with artillery on the whole SG territory. Better if aimed to electric/water processing facilities, as well as airfields.

SG can't send supplies Malacca strait, shipping must come from east. Because SG is based on service, trade and tourism, its economy will grind to a halt. People no longer work, there will be food/water/electricity shortage. There will be unrest.

MY will win....


Revamperz
post Mar 14 2018, 09:45 AM

im freaking IN! ™
*******
Senior Member
5,164 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


i guess this thread will pop up few time a year
internaldisputes
post Mar 14 2018, 09:46 AM

he/his/him
******
Senior Member
1,723 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Malaysia might lose but in terms of the global community we will win their hearts and sympathy because everyone loves to root for the underdog.
patnam
post Mar 14 2018, 09:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


later Singapore would call Israel for an aid, while whom would Malaysia call for an aid...?
yahiko
post Mar 14 2018, 09:48 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,215 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: Penang Island


for sure malaysia

human number wins
kaisiness singapore wins.. they will run away before even start war
SUSEdBaaBaa
post Mar 14 2018, 09:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
QUOTE(ahpoo @ Mar 14 2018, 09:30 AM)
msia win easy....most sinki will balik prc or australia cause sissy...msia n where to go...die die must fight for country...unless ehmm ehmm...
*
Eh, u dunno ah

Cainis balik tongsan
Meleis balik indon
Yindian balik india
Dll? Of cos balik "lain2" places la


There's actually no msians, msians are merely figment of imagination.


SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 09:50 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(weyyt @ Mar 14 2018, 09:36 AM)
Lol 2018 still think sinkapork rely on johor water.

U think they build the marina barrage for fun?
*
Just drop a few bomb to rhe plant. Kaotim
SUSEdBaaBaa
post Mar 14 2018, 09:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Mar 14 2018, 09:43 AM)
One thing for certain...SG will be able to have air superiority over its territory, or even the whole semenanjung. It will be bloody to assault SG directly from JB. But MY troops can fire harassing fire with artillery on the whole SG territory. Better if aimed to electric/water processing facilities, as well as airfields.

SG can't send supplies Malacca strait, shipping must come from east. Because SG is based on service, trade and tourism, its economy will grind to a halt. People no longer work, there will be food/water/electricity shortage. There will be unrest.

MY will win....
*
What's wrong with you?

Y no say INDON will win?

Traitor!

patnam
post Mar 14 2018, 09:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


imagine SG will retaliate by sending the carpet bombing over KL or Putrajaya...
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 09:59 AM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(nonsensezzz @ Mar 14 2018, 09:27 AM)
Both can't win if one invade one another. Because both are defensive countries, not offensive.
Wait, singapore is defensive country or not?
*
Sg spent the most in military expenses in south east asia. But they have zero war experience.

QUOTE(acbc @ Mar 14 2018, 09:35 AM)
Aiya.

MY only need to cut water and food supply. Everyone on the island will starve to death. No need to bomb here and there. Expensive.
*
I tot they got their own water plant adi?

QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Mar 14 2018, 09:43 AM)
One thing for certain...SG will be able to have air superiority over its territory, or even the whole semenanjung. It will be bloody to assault SG directly from JB. But MY troops can fire harassing fire with artillery on the whole SG territory. Better if aimed to electric/water processing facilities, as well as airfields.

SG can't send supplies Malacca strait, shipping must come from east. Because SG is based on service, trade and tourism, its economy will grind to a halt. People no longer work, there will be food/water/electricity shortage. There will be unrest.

MY will win....
*
If msia strike first, we can win. Start at 3am while sg is sleeping. Direct kabom their nearby entrance from jb. Ready 100k spies into the island the day before. Attacking within the cities. Try to bomb their electricity plant and create chaos around the city. Within 24 hours can easily penetrate inside the city and force them to sign agreement return bec sg to msia.

This post has been edited by LamTin: Mar 14 2018, 10:00 AM
cloud666
post Mar 14 2018, 10:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
79 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
sinkie gonna capture nearlee as hostage

so sinkapor win
audryliahepburn
post Mar 14 2018, 10:06 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


stupid thread.
Caterpillar_3309
post Mar 14 2018, 10:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
92 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


line up all of our artillery alongside the beach and fire away. those singkie abengs will pee in their pants.
everest
post Mar 14 2018, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
123 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(joe_star @ Mar 14 2018, 09:25 AM)
Sg army will win
*
SUSLancewood
post Mar 14 2018, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
79 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(fadzly @ Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM)
Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

If Malaysia invades, Singapore will win.

Malaysia doesn’t have the ability to launch large scale invasions. It announced in 2013 (amid the backdrop of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS) that it wanted to establish a marine corps to have that ability but no further news was heard since. Singapore is close enough to Malaysia that you don’t need a marine corps to invade the island, however a successful invasion still depends largely on attaining air superiority or at least air parity over the beachhead. Malaysia has a mix of relatively modern SU-30MKM, F-18 and MiG-29N fighter jets with a respectable arsenal of both Russian and American modern missiles to support an invasion force of assault boats and landing craft. However they are all stationed in the northern region of Malaysia and Singapore has airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircrafts in addition to reconnaissance UAV assets constantly patrolling its airspace in addition to ground radars (and possibly satellites) to prevent the possibility of being sneaked upon by hostile aircrafts and massed military assets at its doorstep.

Further, there are US aircraft carriers calling Singapore’s ports frequently and even the US Navy’s newest Littoral Combat Ships are stationed there on a long term basis[1]. You don’t go and rob a restaurant when there’s a heavyweight wrestler dining there and who’s friends with the owner.

Conversely if Singapore invades, Malaysia will win.

It’s an open secret that Singapore has the capability and specifically trains for an assault into Johor with a so-called Mersing Line as a target to reach and hold in order to have the water pumping stations in Skudai and Kota Tinggi well secured and beyond range of weapons such as the Astros II MLRS or 155mm howitzers. Malaysia may not be as well equipped militarily as Singapore but it has the ability to trade space for time. It knows it can’t win a war head-on with the Singapore Armed Forces and hence wouldn’t engage directly. Instead it will engage in guerilla warfare and jungle warfare with Singapore’s conscript army who are more familiar with the layout of their shopping malls rather than the Malaysian jungles. A conscript army engaged externally also means that Singapore’s economy will ground to a halt due to missing manpower if sanctions by other countries doesn’t cripple the country in two weeks to a month’s time. So if Singapore were actually on the defensive and doesn’t go beyond the Mersing Line, it’s logistics line should be manageable as per drawer plans but the further it goes beyond it the more it will be stretched and be vulnerable to guerrilla tactics by Malaysia. Not to mention it’ll have to deal with more captured ‘POW’ and civilians. They need to be kept under control, fed and taken care of. It’ll be a huge logistical burden on Singapore’s manpower and a burden that their premium war-fighting equipment isn’t actually designed to deal with.

Now if purely for the sake of this question the two armies goes for a mindless all out battle, then Singapore with more personnel that it can muster and more and better critical equipment will win:

Personnel:-

Active: SG (72,000) - MY (110,000)
Reserve: SG (1,386,000) - MY (296,000)

Army:-

Main Battle Tanks: SG (196, German Leopard 2s) - MY (48, Polish PT91Ms)
Light Tanks: SG (?? AMX-13 replacement) - MY (26, UK Scorpions)
Armored Fighting Vehicles: SG (2k+ various models) - MY (1k+ various models)
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems: SG (18 HIMARS) - MY (36, Astros II Launchers)
Self Propelled Howitzers: SG (48) - MY (0)

Air Force:-

Fighter Jets: SG (127 F-15, F-16, F-5s) - MY (75 SU-30MKM, F-18, MiG29N, BAE Hawks, F5s)
AEW&Cs: SG (4 Gulfstream 550s) - MY (0)
Attack Helicopters: SG (17 Apaches) - MY (0)

Navy:-

Frigates: SG (6, Formidable Class) - MY (2, Lekiu CLass)
Corvettes: SG (6, Victory Class) - MY (6, Kasturi & Laksamana Class)
Patrol Vessels: SG (11, Fearless Class) - MY (6, Kedah Class)
Submarines: SG (4) - MY (2)
Amphibious Ships: SG (4, Endurance LST) - MY (2, KD Seri Indera Sakti & KD Mahawangsa)

Footnotes
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
*
Question, why would SG want to invade MY?

Another questions, why would MY want to invade SG?
BuncitPesonawan
post Mar 14 2018, 10:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Aug 2016
From: Fáskrúðsfjörður



QUOTE(Lancewood @ Mar 14 2018, 10:11 AM)
Question, why would SG want to invade MY?

Another questions, why would MY want to invade SG?
*
this.

then only can sembang who win who lose who whatever f
SUSSKY233
post Mar 14 2018, 10:15 AM

u x sukak u keluar
*****
Senior Member
875 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: :hehe:

jamal red army > all
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 10:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 09:59 AM)
Sg spent the most in military expenses in south east asia. But they have zero war experience.
*
they do send lot of their troops to participate in war games and training overseas and majority of their population can handle firearms due to their NS trainings.
SUSLancewood
post Mar 14 2018, 10:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
79 posts

Joined: Feb 2015
QUOTE(hfw @ Mar 14 2018, 10:11 AM)
They have democratic..

We have lunatic, sarcastic, cryptic, fanatic, genetic or romantic.

In conclusion they have democracy.

We have jealousy AND hypocrisy.
*
the last sentence is the truth about Malaysians......specially certain bunch......you know..... icon_idea.gif icon_idea.gif icon_idea.gif


its the same scenario as....
You live in a terrace housing area. Everyday you keep thinking when your next door neighbour goin to break into your house and steal your things and rape and murder your family. Stupid aint it? so every fucking day you live in fear leading a fucking miserable life. May as well move your whole family to tg. Rambutan. Safer for us.

This post has been edited by Lancewood: Mar 14 2018, 10:24 AM
acbc
post Mar 14 2018, 10:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,048 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 09:59 AM)
I tot they got their own water plant adi?
Singapore has been importing water from Johor, under two bilateral agreements. The first agreement was officially signed on October 1961 and expired in August 2011. The second agreement was signed on September 1962 and will expire in 2061. A maximum of 250 million gallons of water a day can be drawn from the Johor River under the agreement. Imported water can supply up to 60 percent of Singapore's water needs.
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 10:23 AM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 14 2018, 10:19 AM)
they do send lot of their troops to participate in war games and training overseas and majority of their population can handle firearms due to their NS trainings.
*
I mean real war experience and they have zero.

Example you train shooting everyday. But suddenly najib orders u to hold M16 for a real war in middle east, you will panic like hell.

But americans are different. Damn steady and easily captured iraq less than a month.
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 10:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



wow.. 4 pages. i didnt know so many army here. oh i forgot. u guys Red Bean Army..
dagnarus
post Mar 14 2018, 10:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
328 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


wow, looking at the numbers, it's quite amazing how much they spent on military considering our gdp is quite similar
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 10:31 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



and this post being reported?

why?

user posted image
Robin Hood
post Mar 14 2018, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: sunny bikini yard


U fight sinki u are bound to fight with her allies.

GHBZDK
post Mar 14 2018, 10:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
173 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
we win hands down.
once they conquer us they will go wtf over Malaysians working attitude and pull back their forces because we are gonna cause huge losses to them as well whistling.gif
yeelong
post Mar 14 2018, 10:37 AM

K for /K
******
Senior Member
1,218 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: Sibu, Cheras Selangor



Bugis warrior will defend us from any evil invasion
Frozen_Sun
post Mar 14 2018, 10:39 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(EdBaaBaa @ Mar 14 2018, 09:51 AM)
What's wrong with you?

Y no say INDON  will win?

Traitor!
*
Why so stereotypical. I only give facts.


QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 09:59 AM)
Sg spent the most in military expenses in south east asia. But they have zero war experience.
I tot they got their own water plant adi?
If msia strike first, we can win. Start at 3am while sg is sleeping. Direct kabom their nearby entrance from jb. Ready 100k spies into the island the day before. Attacking within the cities. Try to bomb their electricity plant and create chaos around the city. Within 24 hours can easily penetrate inside the city and force them to sign agreement return bec sg to msia.
*
Yes...infiltrating hundreds of saboteurs is good. Just blow up anything accessible related to water supply, electricity and communication at H-hour
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 10:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



QUOTE(happyking4ever @ Mar 14 2018, 09:26 AM)
post question, then sendiri answer doh.gif
*
its actually a good idea. so that i dont need to fight anymore as my view already stated from beginning.
Bombgen
post Mar 14 2018, 10:41 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
967 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Donno but i do know that stinky fat small cock keyboard warrior will fly out 1st if anything happens.
scorptim
post Mar 14 2018, 10:43 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
700 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
QUOTE(BannedButtBaboon @ Mar 14 2018, 08:58 AM)
We have enough banglasians in singapork to poison all tom dick and hairy.
*
This! The Malaysians working there is enough to sabo Sg fron inside. Ppl keep forgetting this.
patnam
post Mar 14 2018, 10:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


later SG gonna send thousands of Liang Po Po here...
hoimangkuk
post Mar 14 2018, 10:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: from the country that only know complaining


if we invade singapore...

we might win the land out of sheer number and motivation, but due to singapore heavy spend on military, we will lose a lot of resource until its hard to regain again...

then indon will come to both land...


if singapore invade us...

we will fight back and similar scenario will happen if we invade them...


anyway, indon will be ready to take the chances to win over both of us...
ohman
post Mar 14 2018, 10:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(tak tung tuang @ Mar 14 2018, 08:42 AM)
Of coz malaysia win la.

Sinkapore army full of sissy. Confirm will run away from the battle.
*
Thats why in real life 1 sinki= 3 malaysians.

Because people like you sembang kosong jer pandai.


ihatemynahs
post Mar 14 2018, 10:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


armchair general
ohman
post Mar 14 2018, 10:53 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,178 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(BannedButtBaboon @ Mar 14 2018, 08:58 AM)
We have enough banglasians in malaysia to poison all tom dick and hairy.
*
Sinki has more money to pay for banggla to do that to your water source la idiot.

And johor getting water from singapore too.

Because retards like you, how can this country wins anything?
SUStsunade
post Mar 14 2018, 10:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,063 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Konoha
Indonesia and Philippines will win
hyperspeed
post Mar 14 2018, 11:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
106 posts

Joined: Jan 2009

just send Malaysian myvi overthere. can fly, can dive, can turtle a tank.
Monster Hunter G
post Mar 14 2018, 11:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
198 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


Politically MY and SG will never engage in a full scale war or invasion via military force, at least with the current economical and political climate.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


It boils down to a question of quantity (MY) vs quality (SG) however SG is capable of rapidly fielding close to 80k conscript from it's capable reserve to bolster it's military strengths should the need arise. SG have also one of the best if not the best military force in terms of training and modern military hardware in the entirety of Southeast Asia.

From a statistically standpoint of the aspect of air superiority and electronic warfare, SG will dominate hands down while in terms of raw strength of the army it will be evenly matched but MY will more than likely come out on top in a war of attrition. For the navy side it will be hard to say, but I would personally say it boils down who will take the offensive to invade each other coastal shore giving the attacker a disadvantage.

This post has been edited by Monster Hunter G: Mar 14 2018, 11:10 AM
COOLPINK
post Mar 14 2018, 11:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,665 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
if both go to war the real winners are defense contractors.

Strike
post Mar 14 2018, 11:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL
the bike video simply lulz laugh.gif

one thread that LTZ did right
b3arbear
post Mar 14 2018, 11:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


Sabah Sarawak, cz they will not help and self declare as a new country teeehee
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 11:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



QUOTE(Monster Hunter G @ Mar 14 2018, 11:07 AM)
Politically MY and SG will never engage in a full scale war or invasion via military force, at least with the current economical and political climate.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


It boils down to a question of quantity (MY) vs quality (SG) however SG is capable of rapidly fielding close to 80k conscript from it's capable reserve to bolster it's military strengths should the need arise. SG have also one of the best if not the best military force in terms of training and modern military hardware in the entirety of Southeast Asia.

From a statistically standpoint of the aspect of air superiority and electronic warfare, SG will dominate hands down while in terms of raw strength of the army it will be evenly matched but MY will more than likely come out on top in a war of attrition. For the navy side it will be hard to say, but I would personally say it boils down who will take the offensive to invade each other coastal shore giving the attacker a disadvantage.
*
good answer indeed.
Monster Hunter G
post Mar 14 2018, 11:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
198 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(b3arbear @ Mar 14 2018, 11:13 AM)
Sabah Sarawak, cz they will not help and self declare as a new country teeehee
*
There is a good chance that they might even "join" Brunei in order to form some military, economical and political alliance. Similar to how SG have a long standing currency interchangeability agreement with Brunei till this day. The Brunei and Singapore dollar have the same exact exchange value.
Ayambetul
post Mar 14 2018, 11:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
336 posts

Joined: Mar 2017
QUOTE(Timemuffin @ Mar 14 2018, 08:38 AM)
no brainer.

msia

nothing can stop a swarm of mat rempits
*
laugh.gif ada titik
SUStak tung tuang
post Mar 14 2018, 11:54 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
QUOTE(ohman @ Mar 14 2018, 10:51 AM)
Thats why in real life 1 sinki= 3 malaysians.

Because people like you sembang kosong jer pandai.
*
wah you macai sinkapore also ka. owsem

SUSjoe_star
post Mar 14 2018, 12:46 PM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
QUOTE(everest @ Mar 14 2018, 10:09 AM)

*
Why you edit my post?
Virlution
post Mar 14 2018, 12:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 10:23 AM)
I mean real war experience and they have zero.

Example you train shooting everyday. But suddenly najib orders u to hold M16 for a real war in middle east, you will panic like hell.

But americans are different. Damn steady and easily captured iraq less than a month.
*
How many real war experience the Malaysian army have compare to Singaporean?
Why americians come in the discussion? Americian will probably side with Singapore as well.

You think army training is just stand around shooting range to shoot? smile.gif
SUSNed_Fromthenorth
post Mar 14 2018, 12:48 PM

Tezos till you Bezos
****
Junior Member
640 posts

Joined: Nov 2012



Malaysia. Hate to say this, but malaydia got more stupid retards willing to die for country.
MonsterPips
post Mar 14 2018, 12:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
332 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
Sudah2 la imaginasi
t3n
post Mar 14 2018, 12:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,460 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


we use red shirt
patnam
post Mar 14 2018, 12:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(Super Amoled Fans @ Mar 14 2018, 12:54 PM)
Sabah  Sarawak wins... they will fast2 declare independence... bye2 malaya
*
if then we as Malaya people gonna use passport to go Sabah Sarawak...
andyng38
post Mar 14 2018, 01:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,402 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
China's "coast guard" etc will swoop in as a "peacekeeping force" and take over.

M'sia and Sg must never fight!
SUSgotgiant
post Mar 14 2018, 01:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
707 posts

Joined: Jul 2016


Thread number 99999
kding2
post Mar 14 2018, 01:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Msia win due to numbers, not skill.
deodorant
post Mar 14 2018, 01:17 PM

Surfing LYN instead of Working.
*******
Senior Member
5,691 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(9ChickenMcNuggets @ Mar 14 2018, 01:12 PM)
what weed are u smoking bro ...give me some of that shit...
Singapork doesnt even have any land to grow food (sustainable source of food) for themselves ... let alone water
*
Johor sends raw water to SG, which purifies / processes it and sends it back icon_idea.gif
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 01:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



Stop reporting my post guys.

Attached Image
exhauster
post Mar 14 2018, 01:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
427 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: KK



How do you define win or lose first?
Without a criteria to determine, who also can win la
u win war, he win casualties, so win what?
SUSempatTan
post Mar 14 2018, 01:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,678 posts

Joined: Mar 2016


D key to a Sinkie victory is ekcuali...
doppatroll
post Mar 14 2018, 01:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,123 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
sure malaysia win la...see food also singapore already kalah
unknown warrior
post Mar 14 2018, 01:56 PM

/k/ Legend
*******
Senior Member
6,240 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
Singapore.
mz2020
post Mar 14 2018, 01:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
235 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(Timemuffin @ Mar 14 2018, 08:38 AM)
no brainer.

msia

nothing can stop a swarm of mat rempits
*
empyreal
post Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
2,036 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: KL


With both being countries heavily dependent on trade and situated right next to a main waterway, any sort of conflict is gonna cost both countries tremendously.

Dont even have to look at lost manpower or destroyed assets. Without even a single bullet fired, just looking at the extra insurance premiums ships need to pay just to cross a 'warzone' will make the entire region extremely undesirable.
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
They wont be any war between MAL & SIN....

We depend on each other.

If there is a war.....it will be a 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD.....

This post has been edited by LTZ: Mar 14 2018, 02:01 PM
ZeroSOFInfinity
post Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,703 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(Timemuffin @ Mar 14 2018, 08:38 AM)
no brainer.

msia

nothing can stop a swarm of mat rempits
*
You mean a swarm of "suicidal mat rempits"?


SUSmemekfalui
post Mar 14 2018, 02:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


How to invade??

both checkpoint all jam ham ka ling
Timemuffin
post Mar 14 2018, 02:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
98 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ZeroSOFInfinity @ Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM)
You mean a swarm of "suicidal mat rempits"?
*
no

a swarm of

PREEENNNG PREEEENGNGG PRENNGGGGGGGGG



across the border u hear ur bola oso shrink
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 02:06 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(empyreal @ Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM)
With both being countries heavily dependent on trade and situated right next to a main waterway, any sort of conflict is gonna cost both countries tremendously.

Dont even have to look at lost manpower or destroyed assets. Without even a single bullet fired, just looking at the extra insurance premiums ships need to pay just to cross a 'warzone' will make the entire region extremely undesirable.
*
Setuju
ihavenoidea
post Mar 14 2018, 02:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,300 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(ZeroSOFInfinity @ Mar 14 2018, 02:00 PM)
You mean a swarm of "suicidal mat rempits"?
*
sell them the jihad talk and the promise of syt
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 02:09 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
sepatutnya TS be more specific.....TS tak study what is both main elements to be deployed when war happen...which for me will be almost impossible....

I give u hint... TS.

I narrow down the forces...... pls google for these forces....

3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 14 2018, 02:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
Article missing some assets and qualitative review

SAF also have towed 155mm howitzers, Spike ATGMs, Spyder SAMs and 120mm mortars

MAF have towed 105mm howitzers, Metis-M ATGMs and 120mm mortars too but in much fewer quantity

Pure numbers game because Singapore have much much higher effective defence spending than we do

However such a war will never happen so stop jerking off about it
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 14 2018, 02:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(cadburypicnic @ Mar 14 2018, 09:59 AM)
I’ll be honest. Threads like this reminds me of all the low class (country) vs (country) discussions on kaskus.

Srsly, dont be like indonesians who like to pump themselves up  by putting other countries down (who are clearly better than them)
*
2 points

1) its true this is symptomatic of nationalistic fanatics with inferiority complexes.

2) However it is also a key requirement for the soldiering mindset. A soldier who can objectively assess the situation, see that the odds are stacked against him and refuse to fight is useless. So the army actively seeks for and encourages people like this to join them... people who will fight and believe in their superiority despite all evidence stacked against them.

But remember the words of Magneto: "In chess, the pawns go first."
adlans
post Mar 14 2018, 02:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


FPDA
Kravo
post Mar 14 2018, 02:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,230 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
Sg will win

Look at history, tiongland so big yet lose to small japan
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 02:49 PM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 14 2018, 12:48 PM)
How many real war experience the Malaysian army have compare to Singaporean?
Why americians come in the discussion? Americian will probably side with Singapore as well.

You think army training is just stand around shooting range to shoot?  smile.gif
*
I just said sg got zero real war experience.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 02:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Kravo @ Mar 14 2018, 02:42 PM)
Sg will win

Look at history, tiongland so big yet lose to small japan
*
Not only Japanese were in the Imperial Army. There were also Manchurian, Korean and Taiwanese soldiers. The Japanese also already had a foothold on the mainland with Manchuria as theri vassal kingdom and occupied by the Imperial Army.

By that time china already suffered under multiple natural and man-made disasters and was already informally split into different autonomous sub-states governed by warlords and many of these states just ended a bloody civil war (The central plains War). This plus the open rebellion of the CPC means that there is no way,shape or form china could've resisted the Japanese.

user posted image
China's fragmentation during the Warlord era (1916-1937). The internationally-recognized Kuomintang government under Chiang Kai-Shek is, in reality, composed only of several regions around the capital, Nanking with independent warlords ruling their own fiefdoms in the interior regions.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 14 2018, 02:59 PM
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 02:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 02:09 PM)
sepatutnya TS be more specific.....TS tak study what is both main elements to be deployed when war happen...which for me will be almost impossible....

I give u hint... TS.

I narrow down the forces...... pls google for these forces....

3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD
*
Cyber Warfare, Currency warfare, corporate espionage thumbup.gif
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 02:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
X de sape2 nk study 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD ke?? Ni baru yg btul2 punye capability klu perang. Org tak pakai semua aset klu gi perang....x boleh guna ape yg ade sbb kena pikir defence from diff axis pulak. So ni le elements yg akan involve klu perang jadi...compare both.

3rd CAD & 3rd CAD
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 02:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 02:58 PM)
X de sape2 nk study 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD ke?? Ni baru yg btul2 punye capability klu perang. Org tak pakai semua aset klu gi perang....x boleh guna ape yg ade sbb kena pikir defence from diff axis pulak. So ni le elements yg akan involve klu perang jadi...compare both.

3rd CAD & 3rd CAD
*
ATM got one? In Mindef Jalan Padang Tembak kah?
yeezai
post Mar 14 2018, 03:00 PM

-using no way as way-having no limitation as limitation-
*******
Senior Member
2,531 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Land below the wind
msia got chance ?
patt_sue
post Mar 14 2018, 03:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
867 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


so, already 8 pages, who won? malaysia or singapore?
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 02:59 PM)
ATM got one? In Mindef Jalan Padang Tembak kah?
*
U mean??
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(patt_sue @ Mar 14 2018, 03:01 PM)
so, already 8 pages, who won? malaysia or singapore?
*
Berpuluh2 tered dh psl isu ni...depa suka perang nk buat camne
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:04 PM)
Berpuluh2 tered dh psl isu ni...depa suka perang nk buat camne
*
to restart everything...then got like Marshall plan like in Europe after WW2 icon_idea.gif
burgerking7788
post Mar 14 2018, 03:07 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Mar 2018
lol do you think sg would launch full scale attacks just for that stupid “private request”.

more like cold war only
Kravo
post Mar 14 2018, 03:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,230 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 02:54 PM)
...
Tq 4 ur tldr history
I too lazy to put in few more points, guess let /k figure it out

3 points related to tiongland:
1. Size doesn't matter
2. Patriotism, citizen unity
3. Military professionallism

Honestly, I dunno deep about sinkapor, but do u think malusia has high patriotism to go through this zhit?

When this happen, with $ I will go buy tickets leave this zhit hole, flying to dreamland fully exercising humanity rights to stay and life on that land
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:04 PM)
U mean??
*
This one

Pusat Operasi Pertahanan Siber (Cyber Defence Operation Center) = CDOC

https://www.siberoc.mil.my/
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 02:59 PM)
ATM got one? In Mindef Jalan Padang Tembak kah?
*
What I mean for CAD is Combined Armed Division... the most complete & powerful division for an army forces.

Incidently, the CAD for both armed forces are 3rd Div...

Malaysian 3rd CAD is the one protecting southern region....N9 down to Johor. For singapore I think it covers whole of singapore maybe.....ir northern part.

Both CAD are integrated with complete elements..... to sustain without any support from other division.
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:11 PM)
What I mean for CAD is Combined Armed Division... the most complete & powerful division for an army forces.

Incidently, the CAD for both armed forces are 3rd Div...

Malaysian 3rd CAD is the one protecting southern region....N9 down to Johor. For singapore I think it covers whole of singapore maybe.....ir northern part.

Both CAD are integrated with complete elements..... to sustain without any support from other division.
*
ooo
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:13 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 03:08 PM)
This one

Pusat Operasi Pertahanan Siber (Cyber Defence Operation Center) = CDOC

https://www.siberoc.mil.my/
*
This is CDOC....what I mean is Combined Armed Division (CAD)
TSfadzly
post Mar 14 2018, 03:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



oooo.. so CAD ni apa? lagi tadi 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD
latipbogiba
post Mar 14 2018, 03:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: Dec 2015
From: kolumpo


daripada gaduh dengan jiran baik gaduh dengan taman sebelah
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:11 PM)
What I mean for CAD is Combined Armed Division... the most complete & powerful division for an army forces.

Incidently, the CAD for both armed forces are 3rd Div...

Malaysian 3rd CAD is the one protecting southern region....N9 down to Johor. For singapore I think it covers whole of singapore maybe.....ir northern part.

Both CAD are integrated with complete elements..... to sustain without any support from other division.
*
me not doing enuf googling laugh.gif
kurangak
post Mar 14 2018, 03:16 PM

certified /k addict
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Deus Vult



QUOTE(fadzly @ Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM)
Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

If Malaysia invades, Singapore will win.

Malaysia doesn’t have the ability to launch large scale invasions. It announced in 2013 (amid the backdrop of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS) that it wanted to establish a marine corps to have that ability but no further news was heard since. Singapore is close enough to Malaysia that you don’t need a marine corps to invade the island, however a successful invasion still depends largely on attaining air superiority or at least air parity over the beachhead. Malaysia has a mix of relatively modern SU-30MKM, F-18 and MiG-29N fighter jets with a respectable arsenal of both Russian and American modern missiles to support an invasion force of assault boats and landing craft. However they are all stationed in the northern region of Malaysia and Singapore has airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircrafts in addition to reconnaissance UAV assets constantly patrolling its airspace in addition to ground radars (and possibly satellites) to prevent the possibility of being sneaked upon by hostile aircrafts and massed military assets at its doorstep.

Further, there are US aircraft carriers calling Singapore’s ports frequently and even the US Navy’s newest Littoral Combat Ships are stationed there on a long term basis[1]. You don’t go and rob a restaurant when there’s a heavyweight wrestler dining there and who’s friends with the owner.

Conversely if Singapore invades, Malaysia will win.

It’s an open secret that Singapore has the capability and specifically trains for an assault into Johor with a so-called Mersing Line as a target to reach and hold in order to have the water pumping stations in Skudai and Kota Tinggi well secured and beyond range of weapons such as the Astros II MLRS or 155mm howitzers. Malaysia may not be as well equipped militarily as Singapore but it has the ability to trade space for time. It knows it can’t win a war head-on with the Singapore Armed Forces and hence wouldn’t engage directly. Instead it will engage in guerilla warfare and jungle warfare with Singapore’s conscript army who are more familiar with the layout of their shopping malls rather than the Malaysian jungles. A conscript army engaged externally also means that Singapore’s economy will ground to a halt due to missing manpower if sanctions by other countries doesn’t cripple the country in two weeks to a month’s time. So if Singapore were actually on the defensive and doesn’t go beyond the Mersing Line, it’s logistics line should be manageable as per drawer plans but the further it goes beyond it the more it will be stretched and be vulnerable to guerrilla tactics by Malaysia. Not to mention it’ll have to deal with more captured ‘POW’ and civilians. They need to be kept under control, fed and taken care of. It’ll be a huge logistical burden on Singapore’s manpower and a burden that their premium war-fighting equipment isn’t actually designed to deal with.

Now if purely for the sake of this question the two armies goes for a mindless all out battle, then Singapore with more personnel that it can muster and more and better critical equipment will win:

Personnel:-

Active: SG (72,000) - MY (110,000)
Reserve: SG (1,386,000) - MY (296,000)

Army:-

Main Battle Tanks: SG (196, German Leopard 2s) - MY (48, Polish PT91Ms)
Light Tanks: SG (?? AMX-13 replacement) - MY (26, UK Scorpions)
Armored Fighting Vehicles: SG (2k+ various models) - MY (1k+ various models)
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems: SG (18 HIMARS) - MY (36, Astros II Launchers)
Self Propelled Howitzers: SG (48) - MY (0)

Air Force:-

Fighter Jets: SG (127 F-15, F-16, F-5s) - MY (75 SU-30MKM, F-18, MiG29N, BAE Hawks, F5s)
AEW&Cs: SG (4 Gulfstream 550s) - MY (0)
Attack Helicopters: SG (17 Apaches) - MY (0)

Navy:-

Frigates: SG (6, Formidable Class) - MY (2, Lekiu CLass)
Corvettes: SG (6, Victory Class) - MY (6, Kasturi & Laksamana Class)
Patrol Vessels: SG (11, Fearless Class) - MY (6, Kedah Class)
Submarines: SG (4) - MY (2)
Amphibious Ships: SG (4, Endurance LST) - MY (2, KD Seri Indera Sakti & KD Mahawangsa)

Footnotes
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
*
if 1v1,

which country has more standing army?

which one has bigger border, bigger landmass?

theres ur answer
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:16 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 03:15 PM)
me not doing enuf googling  laugh.gif
*
Cant get much infos.....I knew this during my studies at armed forces staff college

Comparing the total assets is not right....because in wartime all assets & personnel will not be deployed. There will be elements called ASSIGNED FORCES which will be allocated for the ops. Other elements will act as support or standby to face threat from other direction....which is also in another ASSIGNED FORCES.....

This post has been edited by LTZ: Mar 14 2018, 03:19 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 03:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Kravo @ Mar 14 2018, 03:08 PM)
Tq 4 ur tldr history
I too lazy to put in few more points, guess let /k figure it out

3 points related to tiongland:
1. Size doesn't matter
2. Patriotism,  citizen unity
3. Military professionallism

Honestly, I dunno deep about sinkapor, but do u think malusia has high patriotism to go through this zhit?

When this happen, with $ I will go buy tickets leave this zhit hole, flying to dreamland fully exercising humanity rights to stay and life on that land
*
What's stopping u to go rite now? laugh.gif
darium
post Mar 14 2018, 03:22 PM

Tux, not Pingu the Penguin
****
Senior Member
563 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Everything happens for a reason


Singapore lah.

Malaysia

-Finger pointing
-Blame each other

By the time Singapore oledi capture Malaysia. blink.gif
sniper on the roof
post Mar 14 2018, 03:22 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
Bored with this topic di. Why asyik MY vs SG?

Why not indon vs thai or pinoy vs viet or whatever instead?
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 03:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Mar 14 2018, 03:22 PM)
Bored with this topic di. Why asyik MY vs SG?

Why not indon vs thai or pinoy vs viet or whatever instead?
*
Kalau tak libatkan malaysia macamana diorg nak rendah2kan malaysia? tak best la camtu.laugh.gif

Radioactive Infused Cola
post Mar 14 2018, 03:26 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
42 posts

Joined: Aug 2016
what's with the inferiority complex people?
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(darium @ Mar 14 2018, 03:22 PM)
Singapore lah.

Malaysia

-Finger pointing
-Blame each other

By the time Singapore oledi capture Malaysia. blink.gif
*
Besar sgt ke sampai boleh capture malaysia??
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:16 PM)
Cant get much infos.....I knew this during my studies at armed forces staff college

Comparing the total assets is not right....because in wartime all assets & personnel will not be deployed. There will be elements called ASSIGNED FORCES which will be allocated for the ops. Other elements will act as support or standby to face threat from other direction....which is also in another ASSIGNED FORCES.....
*
But /K like to compare military assets hahaha

U already got lencana MTAT?
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 03:23 PM)
Kalau tak libatkan malaysia macamana diorg nak rendah2kan malaysia? tak best la camtu.laugh.gif
*
Yes.....tepat skali. Tujuan utama buka tered ni pun dah suruh org rendahkan malaysia. Tp serendah2 malaysia still sampai lagi kaki kalau naik motor



This post has been edited by LTZ: Mar 14 2018, 03:31 PM
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 03:29 PM)
But /K like to compare military assets hahaha

U already got lencana MTAT?
*
Ya bah.... thanks God
SUSagewisdom
post Mar 14 2018, 03:34 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(fadzly @ Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM)
Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
*
This is really a ridiculous question. Why would Singapore want to invade Malaysia? It's like a small snake trying to gobble a cow...

Therefore, the question is really whether if Malaysia invades Singapore, would they win? Assuming no outside interference, most likely Malaysia would prevail. However, that assumes that this would be politically and economically feasible. And it's not.

After the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, I doubt anyone would be that dumb. Besides, Singapore has no natural resources to speak off and most of the wealth is invested overseas. What's the point of an invasion? doh.gif

JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:31 PM)
Ya bah.... thanks God
*
Congrats rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(agewisdom @ Mar 14 2018, 03:34 PM)
This is really a ridiculous question. Why would Singapore want to invade Malaysia? It's like a small snake trying to gobble a cow...

Therefore, the question is really whether if Malaysia invades Singapore, would they win? Assuming no outside interference, most likely Malaysia would prevail. However, that assumes that this would be politically and economically feasible. And it's not.

After the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, I doubt anyone would be that dumb. Besides, Singapore has no natural resources to speak off and most of the wealth is invested overseas. What's the point of an invasion?  doh.gif
*
Budak suruhan amarika oh wai
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 03:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


One problem of having a conscript civilian army like Singapore is although you can mobilize a large number of trained soldiers in a short time, every military casualty means also the loss of a productive member of society.

This is generally not a problem with professional military forces.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 14 2018, 03:46 PM
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 03:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 03:35 PM)
Congrats  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
This one...

user posted image
zacx
post Mar 14 2018, 03:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


QUOTE(agewisdom @ Mar 14 2018, 03:34 PM)
This is really a ridiculous question. Why would Singapore want to invade Malaysia? It's like a small snake trying to gobble a cow...

Therefore, the question is really whether if Malaysia invades Singapore, would they win? Assuming no outside interference, most likely Malaysia would prevail. However, that assumes that this would be politically and economically feasible. And it's not.

After the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, I doubt anyone would be that dumb. Besides, Singapore has no natural resources to speak off and most of the wealth is invested overseas. What's the point of an invasion?  doh.gif
*
THIS... it's totally pointless to have a war between these two countries....

this thread is just another opportunity for ungrateful and unpatriotic k-tards to degrade and insulting their own country.... they keep creating this kind of thread to satisfy their own pitiful feeling...
JRocket
post Mar 14 2018, 03:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
10 posts

Joined: Sep 2014
persoalannya siapa yang lari dulu?
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(zacx @ Mar 14 2018, 03:46 PM)
THIS... it's totally pointless to have a war between these two countries....

this thread is just another opportunity for ungrateful and unpatriotic k-tards to degrade and insulting their own country.... they keep creating this kind of thread to satisfy their own pitiful feeling...
*
spot on laugh.gif
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 03:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 03:43 PM)
This one...

user posted image
*
looks good....CO Badge next thumbup.gif
CRaider2
post Mar 14 2018, 03:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2017
QUOTE(Monster Hunter G @ Mar 14 2018, 11:07 AM)
Politically MY and SG will never engage in a full scale war or invasion via military force, at least with the current economical and political climate.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


It boils down to a question of quantity (MY) vs quality (SG) however SG is capable of rapidly fielding close to 80k conscript from it's capable reserve to bolster it's military strengths should the need arise. SG have also one of the best if not the best military force in terms of training and modern military hardware in the entirety of Southeast Asia.

From a statistically standpoint of the aspect of air superiority and electronic warfare, SG will dominate hands down while in terms of raw strength of the army it will be evenly matched but MY will more than likely come out on top in a war of attrition. For the navy side it will be hard to say, but I would personally say it boils down who will take the offensive to invade each other coastal shore giving the attacker a disadvantage.
*
This is an interesting question and I share your sentiments exactly. Lets discount external forces be it political will, foreign intervention and just discuss purely on if they actually go to war.
First off what is sg objective in attacking? What are the main and secondary strategic objective? This will determine the length of the war. What will be Msia objective if they attack SG? This will determine how forces are deployed. Sg possess lst/lpd are more suited for invasion as compare to Malaysia. Msia strategy in my opinion is not to go 1 on 1 with Sg units initially. More like a delaying tactic to regroup. For every asset Msia has Sg has a counter if you look carefully. Msia armor would most prob be used for troops support rather than traditional MBT as they would be easy picking to Apaches under AA umbrella. If it degenerates to jungle warfare, they have even limited use. Sg would most prob hope a decisive battle to neutralise Msia main assets with focus on achieving air superiority. I think they have some forces based in Thailand too and that would lockdown some of the northern assets too.

In any case the battle would be fought by both with the element of surprise much similar to Japan in WW2. Sg need to push into Msia and fight there and project force to tie down Msia assets. Couple with rapid deployment of AA umbrella, Sg in Johor would be quite secure. Msia tactics could allow this to happen so they can envelop SG bypassing Johor and invade from there. I believe total surprise can be achieved. Look at how they fumbled with MAS 370 which went undetected and no jets were scrambled to intercept. That tells a lot about readiness. Yes we might have the best equipment but if not utilised properly has no strategic value. Msia will be overwhelmed initially and response delayed. The current command structure need to go thru many levels before a proper response could be delivered. Local commanders imo is hand tied until authorisation is given.

In my opinion, SG will win in the short term with better assets and training and need to quickly achieve whatever their objective before Msia can regroup and win the war of attrition. Much like Japan in WW2 they cannot afford to replace lost assets and Malaysia once they regroup and reorganise will grind out a win in the long run.
Strike
post Mar 14 2018, 04:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL
wow thread still alive

after the bike clip laugh.gif
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:00 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 03:53 PM)
This is an interesting question and I share your sentiments exactly. Lets discount external forces be it political will, foreign intervention and just discuss purely on if they actually go to war.
First off what is sg objective in attacking? What are the main and secondary strategic objective? This will determine the length of the war. What will be Msia objective if they attack SG? This will determine how forces are deployed. Sg possess lst/lpd are more suited for invasion as compare to Malaysia. Msia strategy in my opinion is not to go 1 on 1 with Sg units initially. More like a delaying tactic to regroup. For every asset Msia has Sg has a counter if you look carefully. Msia armor would most prob be used for troops support rather than traditional MBT as they would be easy picking to Apaches under AA umbrella. If it degenerates to jungle warfare, they have even limited use. Sg would most prob hope a decisive battle to neutralise Msia main assets with focus on achieving air superiority. I think they have some forces based in Thailand too and that would lockdown some of the northern assets too.

In any case the battle would be fought by both with the element of surprise much similar to Japan in WW2. Sg need to push into Msia and fight there and project force to tie down Msia assets. Couple with rapid deployment of AA umbrella, Sg in Johor would be quite secure. Msia tactics could allow this to happen so they can envelop SG bypassing Johor and invade from there. I believe total surprise can be achieved. Look at how they fumbled with MAS 370 which went undetected and no jets were scrambled to intercept. That tells a lot about readiness. Yes we might have the best equipment but if not utilised properly has no strategic value. Msia will be overwhelmed initially and response delayed. The current command structure need to go thru many levels before a proper response could be delivered. Local commanders imo is hand tied until authorisation is given.

In my opinion, SG will win in the short term with better assets and training and need to quickly achieve whatever their objective before Msia can regroup and win the war of attrition. Much like Japan in WW2 they cannot afford to replace lost assets and Malaysia once they regroup and reorganise will grind out a win in the long run.
*
Seem u are mastered to explain more on singapore tactics & strategy.... how about malaysia?? Do u see malaysia has no advantage at all??

Theoutspokenguy
post Mar 14 2018, 04:03 PM

I buwee ktards ke ke
*******
Senior Member
4,602 posts

Joined: Nov 2017

QUOTE(Timemuffin @ Mar 14 2018, 08:38 AM)
no brainer.

msia

nothing can stop a swarm of mat rempits
*
NS in malaysia for show Singapore NS very high % can fight. So highly Malaysia will lose.
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 04:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 04:00 PM)
Seem u are mastered to explain more on singapore tactics & strategy.... how about malaysia?? Do u see malaysia has no advantage at all??
*
Armchair general laugh.gif
Timemuffin
post Mar 14 2018, 04:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
98 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Theoutspokenguy @ Mar 14 2018, 04:03 PM)
NS in malaysia for show Singapore NS very high % can fight. So highly Malaysia will lose.
*
have u ever witness the savagery of mat rempits?

why do you think there is no documented video/account of mat rempits attack

its because nobody have ever survived it.....
amirulhakimiazman
post Mar 14 2018, 04:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
147 posts

Joined: Dec 2016
From: Earth 616
malaysia has mama rosmah. sure win liao
Lyu
post Mar 14 2018, 04:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
772 posts

Joined: Jan 2015


if...if...if...
Theoutspokenguy
post Mar 14 2018, 04:17 PM

I buwee ktards ke ke
*******
Senior Member
4,602 posts

Joined: Nov 2017

QUOTE(Timemuffin @ Mar 14 2018, 04:07 PM)
have u ever witness the savagery of mat rempits?

why do you think there is no documented video/account of mat rempits attack

its because nobody have ever survived it.....
*
So you mean you know how pick up weapon you and ride bike automatic become better than trained soldier.

Wow we need a trainer like you.
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 04:20 PM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(JohnKekHow @ Mar 14 2018, 04:04 PM)
Armchair general  laugh.gif
*
K/ will busy reporting in kopitiam while war ongoing in jb n sg city.
CRaider2
post Mar 14 2018, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2017
QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 04:00 PM)
Seem u are mastered to explain more on singapore tactics & strategy.... how about malaysia?? Do u see malaysia has no advantage at all??
*
I hesitate to comment on Msia as the capability is a suspect unlike in the old days some units can go toe to toe with the best units in the world. I have no problem with the capability just the crop of current leaders do not show the required wisdom to use them effectively. Msia in a way is handicapped if it wants to take Sg. How to take a city state without destroying it? What strategic value if you raze it to the ground by urban warfare? Malaysia's main advantage is time. Delaying SG from achieving their strategic objective b4 external forces start to force their hand. Pushing into Johor would be a huge burden on logistics and guerilla warfare can seriously disrupt the sustainability. Imo if SG dont achieve their objective within 2wks they already lost. Msia is disorganised most of the time, something like this would galvanise the people into a single purpose of defending the homeland, mat rempits included smile.gif . So psychologically, Sg cannot win the hearts and mind of the people rather it is like awakening a sleeping giant much like US in WW2. Common people who are united by a single purpose and this gives rise to guerilla warfare and coupled with JMF would buy valuable delaying time to organise a response. The philosophy is not to win every fight but make it less incentive for your enemy to continue
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:29 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(Theoutspokenguy @ Mar 14 2018, 04:03 PM)
NS in malaysia for show Singapore NS very high % can fight. So highly Malaysia will lose.
*
Till what extend?? Care to explain more on ur point. Yes I know malaysian NS is a joke compared to singapore. Their NS is real armed forces element which I cant deny. But we have our own strength as well...
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 04:32 PM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 04:21 PM)
I hesitate to comment on Msia as the capability is a suspect unlike in the old days some units can go toe to toe with the best units in the world. I have no problem with the capability just the crop of current leaders do not show the required wisdom to use them effectively. Msia in a way is handicapped if it wants to take Sg. How to take a city state without destroying it? What strategic value if you raze it to the ground by urban warfare? Malaysia's main advantage is time. Delaying SG from achieving their strategic objective b4 external forces start to force their hand. Pushing into Johor would be a huge burden on logistics and guerilla warfare can seriously disrupt the sustainability. Imo if SG dont achieve their objective within 2wks they already lost. Msia is disorganised most of the time, something like this would galvanise the people into a single purpose of defending the homeland, mat rempits included  smile.gif .  So psychologically, Sg cannot win the hearts and mind of the people rather it is like awakening a sleeping giant much like US in WW2. Common people who are united by a single purpose and this gives rise to guerilla warfare and coupled with JMF would buy valuable delaying time to organise a response. The philosophy is not to win every fight but make it less incentive for your enemy to continue
*
If msia strikes first within a day can capture sg la. Even if sg strikes first they cant go into kl within a day and they will suffer terribly. And msia can counter back and KO sg in hours. We will send armies from johor and from sabah n sarawak will destroy sg in few hours. U reli think those sinkies that tough?

On a serious note its actually a stupid thread. But jus to make some fun. Although sg spend the most on military but they are most vulnerable and the first to collapse if war happens.

This post has been edited by LamTin: Mar 14 2018, 04:33 PM
JohnKekHow
post Mar 14 2018, 04:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Mar 2015


QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 04:32 PM)
If msia strikes first within a day can capture sg la. Even if sg strikes first they cant go into kl within a day and they will suffer terribly. And msia can counter back and KO sg in hours. We will send armies from johor and from sabah n sarawak will destroy sg in few hours. U reli think those sinkies that tough?

On a serious note its actually a stupid thread. But jus to make some fun.
*
SG need nuclear deterrence/umbrella oh wai
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 04:21 PM)
I hesitate to comment on Msia as the capability is a suspect unlike in the old days some units can go toe to toe with the best units in the world. I have no problem with the capability just the crop of current leaders do not show the required wisdom to use them effectively. Msia in a way is handicapped if it wants to take Sg. How to take a city state without destroying it? What strategic value if you raze it to the ground by urban warfare? Malaysia's main advantage is time. Delaying SG from achieving their strategic objective b4 external forces start to force their hand. Pushing into Johor would be a huge burden on logistics and guerilla warfare can seriously disrupt the sustainability. Imo if SG dont achieve their objective within 2wks they already lost. Msia is disorganised most of the time, something like this would galvanise the people into a single purpose of defending the homeland, mat rempits included  smile.gif .  So psychologically, Sg cannot win the hearts and mind of the people rather it is like awakening a sleeping giant much like US in WW2. Common people who are united by a single purpose and this gives rise to guerilla warfare and coupled with JMF would buy valuable delaying time to organise a response. The philosophy is not to win every fight but make it less incentive for your enemy to continue
*
Singapore doctrine is pre-emptive strike....thats the reason they project on their offensive cap... with their well known Mersing line....

Malaysia doctrine is self-defence..... Malaysia wont go towards singapore for urban warfare. Only clandestine ops will be conducted by specops there.

So...to say Malaysia is disorganise on that side.... 1st.... pls look at where is Malaysia 3rd Combined Armed Division (3rd CAD) is located. That is the most war ready division with the most complete & integrated elements. The elements of this CAD is positioned such a way in that region to counter the mersing line doctrine. Thats 3rd CAD.... the main ASSIGNED FORCES for the southern threat. 4th Div..... is the 2nd wave.

MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 04:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Even the slightest rumors of conflict will make all foreign MNC's pack up and leave Singapore by the shipload, which will ruin Singapore's economy more than any actual shooting war will.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 14 2018, 04:42 PM
CRaider2
post Mar 14 2018, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2017
QUOTE(LamTin @ Mar 14 2018, 04:32 PM)
If msia strikes first within a day can capture sg la. Even if sg strikes first they cant go into kl within a day and they will suffer terribly. And msia can counter back and KO sg in hours. We will send armies from johor and from sabah n sarawak will destroy sg in few hours. U reli think those sinkies that tough?

On a serious note its actually a stupid thread. But jus to make some fun. Although sg spend the most on military but they are most vulnerable and the first to collapse if war happens.
*
You are right in a way but have not explained why would MY capture SG. What strategic objective to be achieved? Capture in a day? Have you seen urban warfare? How it bogs down troop movement? Give you an example, Battle of Ramadi, how long did it take to clear sector by sector. Too many simplistic assumption. Mass troop movement will not be detected? Maybe spec ops in SG to remove certain incriminating evidence related to IMDB more likely.

I know it is pointless article but it sure is interesting to hear what others have in mind on IF it happens. It is what armchair generals relish.
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 04:40 PM)
Even rumors of conflict will make foreign MNC's pack and leave by the shipload, which will ruin Singapore's economy more than any actual shooting war will.
*
Kt malaysia depa boleh lari pi utara.... klu kt singapore depa nk lari mana?? Tu semua within artillery coverage je tu..... susun 36 astros....settled





This post has been edited by LTZ: Mar 14 2018, 04:50 PM
Dominic Toretto
post Mar 14 2018, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
70 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
From: The streets of Tokyo drifting with Sean Boswell


MALAYSIA WILL WIN BECOZ WE HAVE A BRAVE PM WHO INHERITED THE PAHLAWAN BUGIS BLOOD! PM SINGAPORE GOT WHAT BLOOD??
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 14 2018, 04:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 04:45 PM)
You are right in a way but have not explained why would MY capture SG. What strategic objective to be achieved? Capture in a day? Have you seen urban warfare? How it bogs down troop movement? Give you an example, Battle of Ramadi, how long did it take to clear sector by sector. Too many simplistic assumption. Mass troop movement will not be detected? Maybe spec ops in SG to remove certain incriminating evidence related to IMDB more likely.

I know it is pointless article but it sure is interesting to hear what others have in mind on IF it happens. It is what armchair generals relish.
*
We can argue if war ever reaches Singapore soil, it's already too late. Singapore is practically finished.

Whether an army is able to totally capture it or not is irrelevant, if you force it to fight on its own soil, it means Singapore will already come into a standstill, ceases to economically function and the dominoes will start to fall. Without international business, trade and an economy running it, what is left for Singapore?

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 14 2018, 04:55 PM
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:56 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 04:53 PM)
We can argue if war ever reaches Singapore soil, it's already too late. Singapore is practically finished.

Whether an army is able to totally capture it or not is irrelevant, if you force it to fight on its own soil, it means Singapore will already come into a standstill, ceases to economically function and the dominoes will start to fall.
*
Thats the reason for their pre-emptive strike....if they failed to achieve that.... this will wait for them....

Inilah barisan kita..... 3rd CAD artillery brigade



Best woooo....susun panjang2
hollyweed
post Mar 14 2018, 04:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: May 2015

msia win la. but if singapork get help from usa. then we gg haha

This post has been edited by hollyweed: Mar 14 2018, 04:57 PM
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 04:59 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(hollyweed @ Mar 14 2018, 04:57 PM)
msia win la. but if singapork get help from usa. then we gg haha
*
We get help from china la pulak
CRaider2
post Mar 14 2018, 05:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2017
QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 04:39 PM)
Singapore doctrine is pre-emptive strike....thats the reason they project on their offensive cap... with their well known Mersing line....

Malaysia doctrine is self-defence..... Malaysia wont go towards singapore for urban warfare. Only clandestine ops will be conducted by specops there.

So...to say Malaysia is disorganise on that side.... 1st.... pls look at where is Malaysia 3rd Combined Armed Division (3rd CAD) is located. That is the most war ready division with the most complete & integrated elements. The elements of this CAD is positioned such a way in that region to counter the mersing line doctrine. Thats 3rd CAD.... the main ASSIGNED FORCES for the southern threat. 4th Div..... is the 2nd wave.
*
So what if the Mersing Line is a red herring? Attack the enemy where he isn't. Supposed 3rd CAD gets hit first and is the real target? So MY is going to mobalise 3rd Div in a decisive battle? You just reinforced my opinion on defensive delaying tactic that CAD is positioned in such a way that it is far enough to overextend the enemy reach while still close enough to engage. Are you assuming the 3rd division placed so far to SG can hold southern Johor preventing it from being overrun without overextending itself? Not familiar with MY SIOP so do not know how fast they can react until proper authorisation is given. Cant just mobalise at will. It would take more than a division to hold while others regroup.

Imo a good commander would not do spec ops in SG as it entails v high casualty. Then again we got a lot of macho wannabes would do anything to succeed. So if we can work out the casus belli for this battle then it would give a clearer picture on force composition, utility and tactics.
fateaverncus
post Mar 14 2018, 05:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
11 posts

Joined: Dec 2017


simple aim whole rocket to pulau..anti-rocket also cant tahan ler..see sg ppl can use their skill from NS or not...even send torpedo also can benam 1 pulau
mohdkakarot
post Mar 14 2018, 05:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Aug 2014


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 04:40 PM)
Even the slightest rumors of conflict will make all foreign MNC's pack up and leave Singapore by the shipload, which will ruin Singapore's economy more than any actual shooting war will.
*
This.
SUSLamTin
post Mar 14 2018, 05:06 PM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 04:45 PM)
You are right in a way but have not explained why would MY capture SG. What strategic objective to be achieved? Capture in a day? Have you seen urban warfare? How it bogs down troop movement? Give you an example, Battle of Ramadi, how long did it take to clear sector by sector. Too many simplistic assumption. Mass troop movement will not be detected? Maybe spec ops in SG to remove certain incriminating evidence related to IMDB more likely.

I know it is pointless article but it sure is interesting to hear what others have in mind on IF it happens. It is what armchair generals relish.
*
3am jus send full force missiles into sg city and full air strikes burning them while they are still sleeping and dreaming. Within hours those sinkies also panic and gg. They not yet able to counter strike, but their city also burned and finished. Whats left for them to survive? Target their airport until those sinkies cannot flee away. brows.gif
I knw its cruel but japanese more cruel in ww2

CRaider2
post Mar 14 2018, 05:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Nov 2017
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 04:53 PM)
We can argue if war ever reaches Singapore soil, it's already too late. Singapore is practically finished.

Whether an army is able to totally capture it or not is irrelevant, if you force it to fight on its own soil, it means Singapore will already come into a standstill, ceases to economically function and the dominoes will start to fall. Without international business, trade and an economy running it, what is left for Singapore?
*
As stated, I am commenting purely from a war POV while leaving out social, economical and political influences. If it really comes to fruition, not just sg would suffer. Thats why I mentioned strategic value for the reason for war. My simple assumption is we have what they need. They dont have what we need.
LTZ
post Mar 14 2018, 05:10 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 05:03 PM)
So what if the Mersing Line is a red herring? Attack the enemy where he isn't. Supposed 3rd CAD gets hit first and is the real target? So MY is going to mobalise 3rd Div in a decisive battle? You just reinforced my opinion on defensive delaying tactic that CAD is positioned in such a way that it is far enough to overextend the enemy reach while still close enough to engage. Are you assuming the 3rd division placed so far to SG can hold southern Johor preventing it from being overrun without overextending itself? Not familiar with MY SIOP so do not know how fast they can react until proper authorisation is given. Cant just mobalise at will. It would take more than a division to hold while others regroup.

Imo a good commander would not do spec ops in SG as it entails v high casualty. Then again we got a lot of macho wannabes would do anything to succeed. So if we can work out the casus belli for this battle then it would give a clearer picture on force composition, utility and tactics.
*
3rd CAD is not positioned in a single place. They are always in move...mostly in guerilla style way. As singapore is good in localisation of target...thats what malaysia do to counter it.

Specops.... it is already tested....sorry to say. Its good enough....
zacx
post Mar 14 2018, 05:32 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
27 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


QUOTE(CRaider2 @ Mar 14 2018, 04:45 PM)
You are right in a way but have not explained why would MY capture SG. What strategic objective to be achieved? Capture in a day? Have you seen urban warfare? How it bogs down troop movement? Give you an example, Battle of Ramadi, how long did it take to clear sector by sector. Too many simplistic assumption. Mass troop movement will not be detected? Maybe spec ops in SG to remove certain incriminating evidence related to IMDB more likely.

I know it is pointless article but it sure is interesting to hear what others have in mind on IF it happens. It is what armchair generals relish.
*
Just bomb and raze all building laa... afterall what is the benefit of retaining Sinkie peoples... can easily being replaced with mat rempit and importing some bangla... LOL

unlike Iraq, you still need to protect your ur citizen inside there...


Drivingmoc118
post Mar 14 2018, 05:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
Malaysia-Singapore war would be a proxy China-USA war. Not sure if China troops can fight the mighty USA. USA, USA, USA
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 15 2018, 01:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
11 pages betul2 sampai blink.gif laugh.gif

Same old nationalistic inferiority complexes being displayed again, no regard for pure fact

Oh well

QUOTE(LTZ @ Mar 14 2018, 02:58 PM)
X de sape2 nk study 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD ke?? Ni baru yg btul2 punye capability klu perang. Org tak pakai semua aset klu gi perang....x boleh guna ape yg ade sbb kena pikir defence from diff axis pulak. So ni le elements yg akan involve klu perang jadi...compare both.

3rd CAD & 3rd CAD
*
What I want to ask is why both side settled on number 3 laugh.gif

For whoever was second to follow... why copycat laugh.gif

Actually I do have more questions. Why do you think the other SG CADs will not be involved? What about their 21st Div and our Airborne brigade?

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Mar 15 2018, 01:07 AM
faizeq
post Mar 15 2018, 05:49 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
13 posts

Joined: Dec 2007

Malaysia sure win... because we have katak , baju merah, keris, cincin, unlimited c4 dan banyak lagi.
Ron2828
post Mar 15 2018, 06:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Mar 2017
QUOTE(faizeq @ Mar 15 2018, 05:49 AM)
Malaysia sure win... because we have katak , baju merah, keris, cincin, unlimited c4 dan banyak lagi.
*
Agree....the sight of General Jamal leading his red shirt troops will send shivers to those sinkies spine.


saikia2046
post Mar 15 2018, 07:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: May 2013


Malaysia don't even need to send troops for winning a war against singapore. Cut the water supply, close the border, all ports and ship yard going 90% sales and tax free. The butterfly effect will shut singapore down within weeks. If Singapore trying to revenge, then blow up the bridge, and they basically left only F16 and some small ships for defense and I believe they don't dare to loose any of them.

But who will do such stupid things? Maintain business partner relationship is benefiting both countries.
LTZ
post Mar 15 2018, 07:38 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
36 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 01:27 AM)
No one would've thought Israel would win the 6-days war either.
*
Ya.....pokok pangkalnya singapore akan menang.

Sbb ekonomi israel x bergantung dgn pak arab pun

This post has been edited by LTZ: Mar 15 2018, 07:39 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 15 2018, 07:55 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 01:27 AM)
No one would've thought Israel would win the 6-days war either.
*
Nonsense. When the Israelis preemptively destroyed the Egyptian and Syrian air forces in the 6-day war, they were practically guaranteed to win the war with their air superiority. That's why the war only lasted 6 days. laugh.gif

You're probably thinking of the 1973 Yom Kippur war. Even that was more of a draw: Israel gained a military victory by defeating the allied arab armies, but lost politically as they had to return the Sinai peninsula ( a valuable buffer) to Egypt and lost control of the Suez canal.

A popular saying about the peace treaty that ended the Yom Kippur war is: "(Anwar) Sadat got the Suez canal and a land huge in resources (the Sinai), while Prime Minister (Menachem) Begin only got a piece of paper."

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 15 2018, 07:56 AM
SUSprince12
post Mar 15 2018, 08:00 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
46 posts

Joined: Dec 2017
Singapore will lose, because Malaysia got bumi ini milik siapa mentality
Donphatz
post Mar 15 2018, 08:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: PJ


interesting, How much does all the subsmarine, heli, jets cost if compare both country.
Virlution
post Mar 15 2018, 09:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


SG got missiles defence systems?

All HDB flats in Sg got a bomb shelters...wonder how strong it is against artillery fire and missiles.

QUOTE(Drivingmoc118 @ Mar 14 2018, 05:52 PM)
Malaysia-Singapore war would be a proxy China-USA war. Not sure if China troops can fight the mighty USA. USA, USA, USA
*
why would China side with Malaysia and not Singapore?
Virlution
post Mar 15 2018, 09:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(saikia2046 @ Mar 15 2018, 07:19 AM)
Malaysia don't even need to send troops for winning a war against singapore. Cut the water supply, close the border, all ports and ship yard going 90% sales and tax free. The butterfly effect will shut singapore down within weeks. If Singapore trying to revenge, then blow up the bridge, and they basically left only F16 and some small ships for defense and I believe they don't dare to loose any of them.

But who will do such stupid things? Maintain business partner relationship is benefiting both countries.
*
lol
Singapore got its own reservoir and treatment plant to treat sewage water. Whole marina bay is fresh water now.
Malaysia buy treated water from Singapore and end up Johor clean no drinking water.

SG have more reserve compare to Malaysia, and Malaysia will bankrupt itself first by doing 90% sale. Ships, trades and all will avoid the area if war anyway.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 15 2018, 10:08 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 15 2018, 09:51 AM)
lol
Singapore got its own reservoir and treatment plant to treat sewage water. Whole marina bay is fresh water now.
Malaysia buy treated water from Singapore and end up Johor clean no drinking water.

SG have more reserve compare to Malaysia, and Malaysia will bankrupt itself first by doing 90% sale. Ships, trades and all will avoid the area if war anyway.
*
If even got the smallest rumor of war/conflict, u think those MNCs and expats who drive Singapore's economy still want to stay there?

Without those, what is Singapore even worth?
TSfadzly
post Mar 15 2018, 10:29 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



wow... 12 pages... i didnt know people in ktard got so many talent in warefare.

and please stop this bullshit.
user posted image

This post has been edited by fadzly: Mar 15 2018, 10:57 AM
keown83
post Mar 15 2018, 11:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: penang wit love

QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 11:05 AM)
Even in the Yom Kippur attack,  Israel, the underdog, still won. You injecting the "politically they lost" quip is like Sadat attacked Israel expecting to lose.  doh.gif
*
why pipu still think that singapore is equivalent with Israel?

singapore is not Israel

singapore dun have what Israel have

singapore is not as high spirit as Israel does

singapore are not as religious & patriotic as Israel

singapore dun have the same humongous support from US like Israel enjoyed for years

& malaysia is not Iraq, nor Iran, nor Syria, nor Jordan

stop thinking that singapore are 'blessed' exactly like Israel just becos singapore got support from Israel

its a very different situation

stop the hallucination & start thinking realistically
BuncitPesonawan
post Mar 15 2018, 11:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Aug 2016
From: Fáskrúðsfjörður



wow 12 pages
Virlution
post Mar 15 2018, 11:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(keown83 @ Mar 15 2018, 11:21 AM)
why pipu still think that singapore is equivalent with Israel?

singapore is not Israel

singapore dun have what Israel have

singapore is not as high spirit as Israel does

singapore are not as religious & patriotic as Israel

singapore dun have the same humongous support from US like Israel enjoyed for years

& malaysia is not Iraq, nor Iran, nor Syria, nor Jordan

stop thinking that singapore are 'blessed' exactly like Israel just becos singapore got support from Israel

its a very different situation

stop the hallucination & start thinking realistically
*
Singapore is not Israel, but Israel was instrumental in creating the Singapore Military.

Unless they had been slacking for the past 30-40 years... I think they should be a force to be reckoned with.
dry.gif
keown83
post Mar 15 2018, 11:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: penang wit love

QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 11:25 AM)
Yes,  Singapore is not Israel. But i wouldn't be so quick to say Malaysia will win a war with them either.
*
nobody will win a neighbour war..not malaysia, not singapore

north korea never win over south korea & vice-versa

south vietnam never win over north vietnam until they reunited

bosnia, serbia, croatia never win with each other even though massacre happened in bosnia until US (with their allies) came & solved the prob once & for all

the same will obviously happened if malaysia-singapore get into war

nobody will win..massacre from both side

many will flee away though i guess singaporean will be the most who runaway from their land (as most of them already have relative or property in foreign countries)

put israel aside becos israel is on the whole new level where they have the best overall support from US & western countries that none of any other countries in this world ever enjoyed it even until now


kennykong85
post Mar 15 2018, 11:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
268 posts

Joined: Apr 2014
From: dont harash me
QUOTE(fadzly @ Mar 14 2018, 08:35 AM)
Assuming one tries to invade the other, the defender will win.

If Malaysia invades, Singapore will win.

Malaysia doesn’t have the ability to launch large scale invasions. It announced in 2013 (amid the backdrop of Chinese assertiveness in the SCS) that it wanted to establish a marine corps to have that ability but no further news was heard since. Singapore is close enough to Malaysia that you don’t need a marine corps to invade the island, however a successful invasion still depends largely on attaining air superiority or at least air parity over the beachhead. Malaysia has a mix of relatively modern SU-30MKM, F-18 and MiG-29N fighter jets with a respectable arsenal of both Russian and American modern missiles to support an invasion force of assault boats and landing craft. However they are all stationed in the northern region of Malaysia and Singapore has airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircrafts in addition to reconnaissance UAV assets constantly patrolling its airspace in addition to ground radars (and possibly satellites) to prevent the possibility of being sneaked upon by hostile aircrafts and massed military assets at its doorstep.

Further, there are US aircraft carriers calling Singapore’s ports frequently and even the US Navy’s newest Littoral Combat Ships are stationed there on a long term basis[1]. You don’t go and rob a restaurant when there’s a heavyweight wrestler dining there and who’s friends with the owner.

Conversely if Singapore invades, Malaysia will win.

It’s an open secret that Singapore has the capability and specifically trains for an assault into Johor with a so-called Mersing Line as a target to reach and hold in order to have the water pumping stations in Skudai and Kota Tinggi well secured and beyond range of weapons such as the Astros II MLRS or 155mm howitzers. Malaysia may not be as well equipped militarily as Singapore but it has the ability to trade space for time. It knows it can’t win a war head-on with the Singapore Armed Forces and hence wouldn’t engage directly. Instead it will engage in guerilla warfare and jungle warfare with Singapore’s conscript army who are more familiar with the layout of their shopping malls rather than the Malaysian jungles. A conscript army engaged externally also means that Singapore’s economy will ground to a halt due to missing manpower if sanctions by other countries doesn’t cripple the country in two weeks to a month’s time. So if Singapore were actually on the defensive and doesn’t go beyond the Mersing Line, it’s logistics line should be manageable as per drawer plans but the further it goes beyond it the more it will be stretched and be vulnerable to guerrilla tactics by Malaysia. Not to mention it’ll have to deal with more captured ‘POW’ and civilians. They need to be kept under control, fed and taken care of. It’ll be a huge logistical burden on Singapore’s manpower and a burden that their premium war-fighting equipment isn’t actually designed to deal with.

Now if purely for the sake of this question the two armies goes for a mindless all out battle, then Singapore with more personnel that it can muster and more and better critical equipment will win:

Personnel:-

Active: SG (72,000) - MY (110,000)
Reserve: SG (1,386,000) - MY (296,000)

Army:-

Main Battle Tanks: SG (196, German Leopard 2s) - MY (48, Polish PT91Ms)
Light Tanks: SG (?? AMX-13 replacement) - MY (26, UK Scorpions)
Armored Fighting Vehicles: SG (2k+ various models) - MY (1k+ various models)
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems: SG (18 HIMARS) - MY (36, Astros II Launchers)
Self Propelled Howitzers: SG (48) - MY (0)

Air Force:-

Fighter Jets: SG (127 F-15, F-16, F-5s) - MY (75 SU-30MKM, F-18, MiG29N, BAE Hawks, F5s)
AEW&Cs: SG (4 Gulfstream 550s) - MY (0)
Attack Helicopters: SG (17 Apaches) - MY (0)

Navy:-

Frigates: SG (6, Formidable Class) - MY (2, Lekiu CLass)
Corvettes: SG (6, Victory Class) - MY (6, Kasturi & Laksamana Class)
Patrol Vessels: SG (11, Fearless Class) - MY (6, Kedah Class)
Submarines: SG (4) - MY (2)
Amphibious Ships: SG (4, Endurance LST) - MY (2, KD Seri Indera Sakti & KD Mahawangsa)

Footnotes
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/...ilitary-muscles
*
Did u mentioned msia submarine? The 2 special submarines? If u did, welldone, if u didnt, u lacist!

cfa28
post Mar 15 2018, 11:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,830 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


The answer is Indonesia.

keown83
post Mar 15 2018, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
172 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: penang wit love

QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 15 2018, 11:33 AM)
Singapore is not Israel, but Israel was instrumental in creating the Singapore Military.

Unless they had been slacking for the past 30-40 years... I think they should be a force to be reckoned with.
dry.gif
*
yes..like malaysia, singapore armed forces is a forces to be reckon with

but to put singapore level side by side with israel is too wishful thinking

singapore is not israel & will never be on par with israel

singapore is not religious, not patriotic & didnt have full-blown support from US allies like what isreal had

yes singapore have support from israel (becos its LKY who go ask for israel's help after being rejected by India & Egypt)..but its not to the extend that Israel gave everything under their hood to singapore until singapore reached the same level as israel (hello, israel is a God-chosen land with God-chosen race-of cos from israel pov, so why the hell they wanna give the whole same treat & level towards non-israeli country?)

so stop thinking that singapore is as same level as israel

singapore is not israel & will never becum as powerful & resilient as israel

stop dreaming & start thinking realistically

This post has been edited by keown83: Mar 15 2018, 01:23 PM
patnam
post Mar 15 2018, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


imagine there is "Ephialtes" at Malaysia side and do the thing that suppose not gonna happen to Singapore side...
wailam
post Mar 15 2018, 11:50 AM

Apa benda ini?
*****
Junior Member
976 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: Sandakan, Sabah


USA wins > all
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 15 2018, 12:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 11:05 AM)
Even in the Yom Kippur attack,  Israel, the underdog, still won. You injecting the "politically they lost" quip is like Sadat attacked Israel expecting to lose.  doh.gif
*
Of course Sadat didn't set out to lose, but in the end Israel didn't totally win either.

Most commentators believe the real reason the war happened was for Egypt and Syria to try and reclaim the Sinai and the Golan heights respectively by invasion. Both know the 'Destroy Israel' platform was totally unrealistic by then. While neither did manage to militarily, the fact that Egypt got the Sinai back anyway via treaty was a pretty much a 'win' situation (just for Egypt though, Syria got nothing out of the war).

Also, while many said if the superpowers didn't interfere Israel would've won much more, ironically the Israel threat of going nuclear when it looked like Israel was close to defeat earlier in the war was the very thing that caused the superpowers to interfere in the first place.




maniack
post Mar 15 2018, 12:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
the country who sell the weapon actually win
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 15 2018, 01:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 15 2018, 12:19 PM)
Of course Sadat didn't set out to lose, but in the end Israel didn't totally win either.

Most commentators believe the real reason the war happened was for Egypt and Syria to try and reclaim the Sinai and the Golan heights respectively by invasion. Both know the 'Destroy Israel' platform was totally unrealistic by then. While neither did manage to militarily, the fact that Egypt got the Sinai back anyway via treaty was a pretty much a 'win' situation (just for Egypt though, Syria got nothing out of the war).

Also, while many said if the superpowers didn't interfere Israel would've won much more, ironically the Israel threat of going nuclear when it looked like Israel was close to defeat earlier in the war was the very thing that caused the superpowers to interfere in the first place.
*
Israel traded land it had conquered earlier for lasting peace with Egypt, destroyed the Syrian army and eventually made peace with Jordan as well

There's no way to spin it as a loss for them whether tactically or strategically

As for superpower interference... the Soviets supplied the Arabs with vast numbers of their best equipment, including better tanks, ATGMs and SAMs. They gave Syria the weapons needed to fight the Israelis on the best technological ground the Syrians ever had... and still lost. It was a key factor to the Soviet reassessment of the gap between Western technology and their own.
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 15 2018, 01:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(keown83 @ Mar 15 2018, 11:44 AM)

stop dreaming & start thinking realistically
*
Lmao laugh.gif
J1g54w
post Mar 15 2018, 01:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2015
but SG can win against potek potek or not?
Drivingmoc118
post Mar 15 2018, 03:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 15 2018, 09:45 AM)
SG got missiles defence systems?

All HDB flats in Sg got a bomb shelters...wonder how strong it is against artillery fire and missiles.
why would China side with Malaysia and not Singapore?
*
Singapore has always been an American ally. And Malaysia is slowly turning into China’s bulwark against Singapore and the Philippines who are traditionally Americans allies.
TSfadzly
post Mar 15 2018, 05:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



QUOTE(kennykong85 @ Mar 15 2018, 11:36 AM)
Did u mentioned msia submarine? The 2 special submarines? If u did, welldone, if u didnt, u lacist!
*
u talk politics. im not that low. we are serious here. lol
SUSsdin3269
post Mar 15 2018, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
64 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
QUOTE(hardreality @ Mar 15 2018, 01:27 AM)
No one would've thought Israel would win the 6-days war either.
*
Arab soldiers are very disorganized and lack of discipline. If you know the arab they always follow their tribe leader not the proper chain of command. If the chief say cabut, all their tribes will cabut, even among tribes also at logger head and `big headed; too.

Ours are proven will better discipline, have war experience and many UN mission exposures.


Key factors in the short war is they they power due to Israel pre emp strike. The Israeli air force wiped out mos of the Egyptian and Syrian air forces while they were still on the ground, and therefore had no resistance at all in the air. The tanks also destroyed.

Meanwhile in Singapore position, most of their assets are not in Singapore, so they dont have the element of surprise , which is a key factor for pre emp attack. If they bring their assets, we will massed our forces nearby for some "military exercise." Our commandos already in Singapore with border passport. whistling.gif whistling.gif
SUSLamTin
post Mar 15 2018, 10:09 PM

Time will prove everything!
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(sdin3269 @ Mar 15 2018, 10:01 PM)
Arab soldiers are very disorganized and lack of discipline. If you know the arab they always follow their tribe leader not the proper chain of command. If the chief say cabut, all their tribes will cabut, even among tribes also at logger head and `big headed; too.

Ours are proven will better discipline, have war experience and many UN mission exposures.
Key factors in the short war is they they power due to Israel pre emp strike. The Israeli air force wiped out mos of the Egyptian and Syrian air forces while they were still on the ground, and therefore had no resistance at all in the air. The tanks also destroyed.

Meanwhile in Singapore position, most of their assets are not in Singapore, so they dont have the element of surprise , which is a key factor for pre emp attack. If they bring their assets, we will massed our forces nearby for some "military exercise." Our commandos already in Singapore with border passport. whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
Only if they can transfer 200 too 300billion SGD money to swiss or other country immediately but dont think they can. Bcoz we gonna air strike them on 3am while they are still dreaming n sleeping. Once we burn and bom all their skycrappers n destroy their airport,hospitals and electric plants. SG practically game over. Their currency will become like no value many big corporates bankrupt.

Thats why they willing to spend so much on military expenses to protect the island from sudden attacks.
sniper on the roof
post Mar 15 2018, 11:00 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(sdin3269 @ Mar 15 2018, 10:01 PM)


Meanwhile in Singapore position, most of their assets are not in Singapore, so they dont have the element of surprise , which is a key factor for pre emp attack. If they bring their assets, we will massed our forces nearby for some "military exercise." Our commandos already in Singapore with border passport. whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
A quarter of Singapore's F-15s are based in the US but thats still more F-15s than Sukhois.
saikia2046
post Mar 16 2018, 06:31 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
414 posts

Joined: May 2013


QUOTE(Virlution @ Mar 15 2018, 09:51 AM)
lol
Singapore got its own reservoir and treatment plant to treat sewage water. Whole marina bay is fresh water now.
Malaysia buy treated water from Singapore and end up Johor clean no drinking water.

SG have more reserve compare to Malaysia, and Malaysia will bankrupt itself first by doing 90% sale. Ships, trades and all will avoid the area if war anyway.
*
Then what is the reason they still get water from Malaysia? The cost of maintaining the ship yards, including labor cost, still far cheaper than a real war. perhaps, by just announcing something funny, can make singapore stock market instant evaporate billions of US$, which is better than doing physical damage by declaring war.

Regardless if they have many reserves be it water or money, when the investors and rich citizens start running away, they will have problems which are bigger than a war.
PATAR
post Mar 16 2018, 06:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
197 posts

Joined: Jan 2018
From: Sweden/Kedah
If there is war between SG and M'sia only possible winners are Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines and Brunei.
Kravo
post Mar 16 2018, 08:40 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,230 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 14 2018, 03:19 PM)
What's stopping u to go rite now? laugh.gif
*
$
TSfadzly
post Mar 16 2018, 09:37 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



QUOTE(Tun.Daim @ Mar 16 2018, 06:55 AM)
Ts probably 12 years old kiddo
Homework dah buat ke adik?

Both countries depended on each other.
If war happens, wonder where Singapore gonna get food supply, even sayur & water imported from Malaysia.

Malaysia have war before can tanam ubi kayu.
*
ya. im a kid bro.
im a member since 2005. now is 2018

u are almost correct. im 13 years old now.

This post has been edited by fadzly: Mar 16 2018, 09:38 AM
vin39
post Mar 16 2018, 10:18 AM

I LOVE MALAYSIA!!!!
*******
Senior Member
2,550 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Petaling Jaya, Selangor



QUOTE(Theoutspokenguy @ Mar 14 2018, 04:17 PM)
So you mean  you know how pick up weapon you and ride bike automatic become better than trained soldier.

Wow we need a trainer like you.
*
calm your tits la. sarcasm meter rosak ke?
BuncitPesonawan
post Mar 16 2018, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
142 posts

Joined: Aug 2016
From: Fáskrúðsfjörður



QUOTE(vin39 @ Mar 16 2018, 10:18 AM)
calm your tits la. sarcasm meter rosak ke?
*
dia kan outspokenguy biggrin.gif
TSfadzly
post May 10 2018, 01:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,757 posts

Joined: Oct 2005



So what happen now?

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0628sec    0.69    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:21 AM