sepatutnya TS be more specific.....TS tak study what is both main elements to be deployed when war happen...which for me will be almost impossible....

I give u hint... TS.

I narrow down the forces...... pls google for these forces....

3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD

X de sape2 nk study 3rd CAD vs 3rd CAD ke?? Ni baru yg btul2 punye capability klu perang. Org tak pakai semua aset klu gi perang....x boleh guna ape yg ade sbb kena pikir defence from diff axis pulak. So ni le elements yg akan involve klu perang jadi...compare both.

3rd CAD & 3rd CAD

Berpuluh2 tered dh psl isu ni...depa suka perang nk buat camne

U mean??

What I mean for CAD is Combined Armed Division... the most complete & powerful division for an army forces.

Incidently, the CAD for both armed forces are 3rd Div...

Malaysian 3rd CAD is the one protecting southern region....N9 down to Johor. For singapore I think it covers whole of singapore maybe.....ir northern part.

Both CAD are integrated with complete elements..... to sustain without any support from other division.

What I mean for CAD is Combined Armed Division... the most complete & powerful division for an army forces.

Incidently, the CAD for both armed forces are 3rd Div...

Malaysian 3rd CAD is the one protecting southern region....N9 down to Johor. For singapore I think it covers whole of singapore maybe.....ir northern part.

Both CAD are integrated with complete elements..... to sustain without any support from other division.

Cant get much infos.....I knew this during my studies at armed forces staff college

Comparing the total assets is not right....because in wartime all assets & personnel will not be deployed. There will be elements called ASSIGNED FORCES which will be allocated for the ops. Other elements will act as support or standby to face threat from other direction....which is also in another ASSIGNED FORCES.....

Ya bah.... thanks God

This is really a ridiculous question. Why would Singapore want to invade Malaysia? It's like a small snake trying to gobble a cow...

Therefore, the question is really whether if Malaysia invades Singapore, would they win? Assuming no outside interference, most likely Malaysia would prevail. However, that assumes that this would be politically and economically feasible. And it's not.

After the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, I doubt anyone would be that dumb. Besides, Singapore has no natural resources to speak off and most of the wealth is invested overseas. What's the point of an invasion? 

THIS... it's totally pointless to have a war between these two countries....

this thread is just another opportunity for ungrateful and unpatriotic k-tards to degrade and insulting their own country.... they keep creating this kind of thread to satisfy their own pitiful feeling...

This one...

Seem u are mastered to explain more on singapore tactics & strategy.... how about malaysia?? Do u see malaysia has no advantage at all??

If msia strikes first within a day can capture sg la. Even if sg strikes first they cant go into kl within a day and they will suffer terribly. And msia can counter back and KO sg in hours. We will send armies from johor and from sabah n sarawak will destroy sg in few hours. U reli think those sinkies that tough?

On a serious note its actually a stupid thread. But jus to make some fun.