Ya ka ? hmm.. 1500 rpm ?  Need to double checked again. My salesman told me 3K pulak. During test drive also feel the power when above 3k.
Thanks for the info.

Anyway, I drive 1.8s.

Civic 1.5 is tuned for efficiency not speed. Hence, the linear curve.

Civic 1.5 0-100km/h, tested with Vbox is 9.1s. stock everything, and no passenger.

Which is very respectable.

BCteh, good find

seems like a very expensive option to change still, how about this?

https://www.osram.asia/am/ecat/NIGHT%20BREA...at/ZMP_4054436/

anybody have an idea on this?

Can share the link in lazada or lelong ? H11 right ?

Recently I drove my 1.8S, I heard some metallic sound coming from my engine sometimes. For example when coming to a complete stop to a road bump, or hill climb, once I accelerate I heard some krik krik krik coming from the engine just a split second. I been pumping shell RON97 since i get the car. Not sure izzit engine pinging/knocking.

I think the main issue is still the CVT
on jammed city drive, you will feel the jerk @ 30kmph , dunno why they want to implement the fake "gear change" at that low revs
the car will surge forward everytime the speed drop to 30kmph (i think there is one also at ~60kmph)

then at highway, on flats is no problem
hilly? seems just not enough

or maybe the interior sound deadening not good enuff
PS: lucky I live and work where the traffic is not so packed and all of the places is within easy reach

I didn't notice any shift on D at 5k range though, but then I didn't last very long there since in a bit already got car in front kacau haha...

But I think the video you've seen the S will emulate shifting pattern.

got my car about 2 weeks, run 800 km, oil life left 5.1k.

Daily morning commuting city traffic (no stop jam but heavy), night free highway run back home.

Personally, of course i am hoping we get the 6% GST back in cash form.

I am not expecting it to be any way else as well once govt. fully clarifies the mechanism for all parties.

The main problem here from an economic point of view is that business operators (especially car makers and every other industry that depends on sourcing external materials) had incurred GST up front for materials from multiple parties they use to build a vehicle. Whether the govt. promises them the ability to claim back their input tax back or whether the govt. actually have the money in their reserves to pay them back is also another matter.

If you are a business operator today and you have a lot of stock of whatever you are selling, do you think you want to sell it without the GST amount charged (which you have paid) without having confirmation that you will get the money back from the kastams department?

There is actually a difference between getting your money stuck somewhere where you can get it back later vs totally losing those money.

So, it is imperative that the govt. clarifies this doubt to corporations as this indirectly affects the consumers.

A mandate is a mandate, but if the mandate causes business owners to lose money. There will be an uproar between business owners about this as well.

p/s: i am not speaking of this lightly because i am also taking delivery of a new car soon and this could not be a worst time as i do not have information on how this is going to go

Yes, it is agreed that prices prior to 1st of June will remain as the mandate has not come into effect.

But what is the point to sign any non-standardized agreement documentation? since the customer has the choice to also delay the registration and delivery of the car.

If the customer chooses to delay and end up the car prices remain upon 1st of June for whatever reasons and Honda announces no promotion for period of June, then it is understood to be the customers lost as it is primarily down to the customer's own decision. That much is understood. It is the sales advisor's duty to inform the customer of their available choices, actions and consequences if they decide to do so.

If it is an agreement that is forced by the dealership than i think it is something you should bring up to Honda Malaysia to confirm if this is an instruction from up top.

U mean every 5k to 6k need to change oil? If 6k change oil also abnormal  right? Normally is 10k right for full syntetic oil?

Hi guys,  in the civic brochure, on of the difference between 1.8s and 1.5tc interior is the premium interior garnish (which 1.8 don't have).  Can someone detailed out on that.  I thought only leather seat is the difference for the interior.

Actually, i don't know how much difference is between MX and RX. For a jump from FX to MX is already quite a considerable amount to pay for. From MX to jump through QX into RX for another RM300 doesn't sound like a lot. But, does it make much difference? That is the real question. The extra 1.0mil, TSER and IR Rejection is there, but what does it actually mean in the real world is the question.



The only thing that means anything to me is the light transmittance and even that is just only a 2% difference from FX to RX.

The visible light reflection is also interesting but they never state whether it is measured on the interior or exterior. This is also quite crucial especially during night driving as things on the dash whether it is a mobile phone running waze or some shiny reflective item on the dash will be reflected like a mirror on the tint during night time or when the outside light is lesser than the interior.

TC/TCP has the oil / oil filter interval service for A and B in addition to the periodic service. So the periodic service doesn't change the oil / oil filter anymore. Is my understanding correct?

Anyone did a calculation or rough estimation of how much (in terms of %) does the maintenance of the TC/TCP higher than the 1.8?

Just got clarification from SA, all Civic rolled from June 2018 onwards don't have those sensors. Apparently, there's lot of complain regarding the sensors too sensitive like setting off alarm with heavy rain downpour.

Does anyone know the price for the windscreen ? Just notice my windscreen broken ..