Any comment/review on Samsung 65" TU8500? Not much review can be found online, nearest would be TU8000 which is deemed good "jack of all trade" budget TV. Thanks.

Would very much like to hear your views on GZ1000 vs C9 vs A8G?

Thanks. Pretty much summarizes my research on this model. I think the main question is, would this TV be a reasonable purchase for less than RM4k, or is there better model to consider?

I got offer by Senheng
Sony KD65A8G

RM 10,700 and got member point RM 1,070.
Mean this oled Tv around cost me RM 9,630

While the LG c9 65inch need around 13k.

Sony is built is android tv, LG is web os developed by them but has mouse cursor feature in remote.

I can’t really tell the color between these 2 models. I was told by the salesperson in senheng, Sony is tends to more natural color and LG is more vivid and saturated.

Anyone here who own Oled can give me suggestions?

I am looking to buy 65 inch tv. I read finish the forum until dizzy. So went to shop to see myself the quality, but no much choices to compare.

I understand from forum and the following is preferred?

Sony KD65X8000G
Panasonic GX740
I saw from the shop 65UM7290PTD looks not bad, any worth ?

Budget Around RM 4K to 5K

Any advice ? Might grab one after salary 😅

that would mean you have to have Chromecast device. Or a TV with Chromecast built in?

I seen people using the tv remote and the inputting of text is really pain taking. almost dinosaur age.

If Android TV OS ( true Google certified ), 99% confirmed have Chromecast build in.
Ya, I was surprise my Samsung ( non Android TV OS ) can do that for Youtube    From Android or Windows also can cast.

my cikai eyes seems that LG OLED color can be good enough. samsung qled macam more saturated to my eyes.

i am always on cinema or cinema home mode. Vivid mode is very eye candy to my eyes, but i felt tiring after watching it for sometimes. is like feeding u sweets until u sugar rush over rush lol.

That is not a problem exclusive to Samsung's TV . All TV brands have a mega over-saturated Dynamic /Vivid mode .
These "QLED" has a weakness  of not able to fully tame its massive colors spectrum but undersaturated is not one of them .
Samsung's Flagship TVs  has a movie mode that is fairly accurate , far more than a certain ABC brands I won't be naming here .
What is not accurate is their PQ adherence  . Since PQ is absolute , it is hard to calibrate your TV to exact same level as PQ chart . 

The wRGB OLED TV is losing color saturation at brighter colors is not exactly a secret .
The problem lies with sites like rtings when people tend to throw their numbers around like swinging a sword , often end up hurting themself more than not .
You see the DCI coverage numbers from rtings on OLED TV - 98 % ! 
And then you look at the Quantum Dots LCD , only 95% ? Woohoo OLED Wins , amirite ?

Does that DCI chart from rting tell you the whole story ? Not at all , not even close .
Those numbers are 2D measurement but the color spectrum is a 3D monster . They are not representative of how your TV will perform .
If the 2D color coverage is not that important , why not just focus on the MDC test ? Because it is very difficult to measure color volume . 

Typically we only take 8 measurement or so for the Color Gamut . For Color Volume we have to do hundreds of them.
(We now have MDC from Dolby Lab that can measure color saturation up to 10000 cd/m2 on Rec.2100 )

In a MDC test of 1000 cd/m2 ,  we can use a very loose number to tell the difference.

A wRGB OLED can show roughly 300 ~ 400 millions colors .
A Quantum Dots TV with 2000 cd/m2 such as those Vizio Quantum and Q95T can do 800 millions +, possibly way more due to limited size samples .

[Note :  this is assuming all test is done on 10% window where LCD is typically brighter at 15-25 % and OLED is brightest at 3% , all pixels have 10 bit color component .
Barring these numbers , there is a lot more color science involved behind the scene , I am not explaining that on a forum .)
This indicate a TV with high brightness isn't just a screen with dazzling lights , they also have a whole new world of color saturation range that is wider than wRGB OLED .

Note : To those who complain about 2000 cd/m2 being too bright , remember they are talking about an additive color system . The brightest white of 2000 nits , does not mean TV is going to show you 2000 nits of colors  .
Brightest peak of white consist of 3 other separate primary colors , namely Red , Green and Blue . As a result , a pure saturated blue may just end up to be around 200 nits on a display of 2000 nits peak . 
Now imagine your OLED TV may be struggling to reproduce 200 nits of 100% saturated blue .

I am sure a lot of the OLED elitist ( like I once was ) will tell you perfect black makes everything .
True that the perfect black will leverage some of the shortcoming but what about scenes with a lot of bright area ?

On high APL ( > 70% ) scenes , where you will find a noticeable difference in movies that has such as the fairly recent Maleficent 2 , where it looks quite a bit paler on a wRGB OLED .
Or you can try playing the same movie on your Samsung S20 or Iphone , you just cannot get the same level of vibrancy on OLED TV .
OLED TVs ( the panels manufactured by LGD specifically ) has hit the roadbloack in terms of Picture Quality for several years now . The LCDs , however are improving to close the gap every year .

In the past few years , they have introduced wide angles optical filters ( not perfect but an innovation regardless ) , achieve an even higher level of sustainable brightness , dual layer LCD with light compensation technique ( not the same as those you found on mid-range Samsung TV ) , a more advanced algorithm of Local Dimming that does not need to rely on numbers of dimming zones , VRR ( they have it before the OLEDs ) ...

I have always adore the self emissive screens , from good old plasma to OLEDs .

As I see it now , there is a spot for the OLEDs and a spot for the Quantum LCDs .

OLED TV is no doubt a masterpiece for SDR stuff . But its HDR performance could use more improvement , including the less than ideal dark gray performance .
This give us a reason to wait for LG to announce its top emission transition every year , and the new Quantum Blue OLEDs from Samsung .

Are there other recommendations beside this?
That's way off my budget. add another 2k+ and can get a OLED samsung 65".

I really cant imagine spending 10k on a TV tbh. I still have other parts of the house for renovation 
so tryna get the best choices according to my budget and my limited knowledge on TVs 

Sony  900H  still best value tv if you care about HDR performance. Other tv  which  lower cost than x900H, you will get terrible HDR  experience.

Any one using Samsung QLED q95t? Hope to get some opinion on this.

no Dolby Vision support...big let down for Home Cinema fans (4K UHDs)
price similar/expensive than OLED....

Looking at LG OLED65CXPTA, the tv on stand is too low thus a soundbar with height of 6cm would be blocking the view 

IMO, generally the most natural looking are the Panasonic, I felt even more so than the Sonys. Which means they are less vivid and often doesn't stands out in a brightly lighted showroom. So many people will ignore the Panasonic and go for the Samsung/LG instead.

I think it depends on your room and usage. My TV room has lots of windows for a more spacious and airy feel. So for daytime viewing, a brighter TV is better especially for HDR content (4k blurays).

At night, we close the blinds but still have the lights on. Some people like to watch in dim or no lights but we have children and love to snack while watching.

I have a Samsung TV and although it's not calibrated, the movie preset is not bad imho. Plus, I think it's easier to have a bright TV and reduce the brightness if needed than try to increase it on a dimmer model.

On a side note, i'm thinking of upgrading to the Samsung Q80T. Anybody have any experience with this model?

X90H vs Q80T. Which ia better for 55 inch ? Should I look at oled option

Hi Sifus,

I'm newbie to tech thingy.
Looking for 65" tv to be place in my living room, which is pretty bright in day time.

My budget is roughly RM5k to RM6k.

Been eyeing for these 2 models; Panasonic 65GX800K & LG 65NANO81TNA which of these better in terms of performance?

Mainly for movie purpose + music (to purchase sound system when have budget =.=)

Please advice sifus. Thanks!