Many people say this tire no good and was thinking of changing. But I find it perfectly adequate in both dry and wet. May be I seldom drive above 100kph in the wet.

Never got the chance to try the AWD but my guess is, it might be slower to move. And I don't drive fast in wet. Hence went for the E instead.

As for the turbo, hardly can feel it. In fact, it felt like a NA.

May I ask, what tires would be better for the CRV? May want to try it out when time comes for replacement.

Just curious. How much is the normal trade in value of your Toyo?

many moons ago, I was interested and test drove a G3 CRV. I couldn't believe how bad was the NVH and thought there is something wrong with the car.

some people says G6 has some European flavor, whatever that means.

On highway I normally drive between 100 - 120 kph and at that speed, the turbo should be better than the RS.

In town, of course the RS is better.

I think Honda's Toyo similar price to Michelin. So I will try Michelin next time.

may I ask, about how much the price for the Primacy SUV+ for this size?

I have only very briefly driven a RS for about 1 km on the same stretch or road. Compared to the 1.5T, the road noise sounded sort of similar to me.

And when I tried to accelerate hard, RS will deliberately produce fake engine noise. So overall feeling is, again, they both sounded quite similar.

Would you say, the G6 V AWD pick up is like a G5 2WD on Eco mode? Or worst?

And what speed and road condition were you driving when you say the AWD cornering is better?

I could only get bellow 13km/L on the G6 2WD. You probably driving below 100kph on average?

One reason I didn't want a AWD is because of the potential slower pick up. Not driving aggressively so not sure how significant is the better cornering ability.

Malaysian petrol is cheap.

And if you read carefully what some reviewers are saying, they are saying Turbo drive better than Hybrid on higher speed highway. I have briefly tried Hybrid and I agree. Since I do drive long distance, I am not comfortable with lack of spire tire.

In town and fuel consumption, of course the Hybrid is better

Having the G6 turbo for a few months already, things I nit pick are:
1. At red light idling, there is more vibration compared to other cars
2. The seats cushion are too thin for long distance.
3. I prefer to set front tires from 35 psi to 34 psi

I was torn between the better pick up speed of the E spec vs the "supposedly" better cornering stability of the V spec. Never got the chance to try the V spec myself. I would only assume the power of the V spec would be like an E spec with ECO mode on.

From Honda's brochure. 0-100kph.
Hybrid is 9.0 sec
E is 9.8 sec
V is 10.4 sec

My G6 wiper

Yes

At traffic red light. The petrol version engine vibration is above-average bad.

Other than that, I don't miss the Hybrid.

I am familiar with the turbo and went for a test drive of the hybrid. I wouldn't say there is a night and day difference worthy the extra money and potentially high cost of battery and no spare tires for out of town driving etc

Car reviewers don't have to consider those -ve factors

This post has been edited by touristking: May 27 2024, 05:35 PM