If you're currently using a 29" CRT tv, then a widescreen 37" LCDTV would be around the same height (slightly higher actually), but wider of coz.

yes, higher

i did some comparisons, tat is why i wun go for 32 if possible, cos the height is in fact lower than the 29 CRT

cos most of the time, still will see shows on 4:3, only watching dvds only 16:9

but 40 really jialat, so big, or is it merely a bit more than 37?
i think 37 phasedout soon, later only 32 and 40 incher nia

Laser TV will pwned both plasma and LCD...
which has a clearer, sharper images and cheaper to produce too...
Lets hope it will be in mass production soon

i think for laser tv, still have a long time to wait for it to becum reasonable hor

Here's a link to help u estimate the size an aspect ratio difference among different size of TV/LCDs.

TV Calculator

wa seh, tis is good!!!!!!!!!! []

waaa...even tv has its own calculator...

There's even a rims and tyre size calculator...

Hehehe...got a girlfriend calculator also?

ermmmmmmmmmmmmmm

This post has been edited by burgerkill: Feb 17 2009, 10:09 AM

Yippieeee

plasma is superior to LCD in every aspect regarding picture quality. The only concerns with plasma is:

1) burn-in if you left it on static for VERY long (a few days)
2) Image retention - happens all the time but is fades off quickly
3) power consumption...150-200% more than lcd

other than that, lcd can kiss my ass...click on the link in my sig to see why.

Every people hv their own opinion..... but for me, i've seen it all. Here i want to share my side of the story:
Went to an electrical shop cos i want to see which display is the best, then stumble to the Pioneer display (from what i heard, Pioneer PDP is the bestest in the world ), sit there to watch some demo movies using Pioneer DVD upscaller player. Then come the seller promoting to me with his sweet talk....bla bla bla. But then, i realise that there's some shadowy lines on the left of the display (even i'm not a HT pro can see it), but the seller denies it, then i want to leave, somehow the manager came and he admit thats a faulty display, then OK la.
But at another day went to another shop just to see the same display, guess what.... the Pioneer PDP have the same sh@#$y problems. I dont know WTF is happening here.....so to my conclusion Plasma is a SUXXOR.
Added: BTW, 1080p plasmas still nowhere to be found. That Hitachi PDP resolution at 1024x1080 what kind of resolution is that? Are they trying to cheat the n00bs.
I know now the Plasma fanboy are trying at least to flame me, but this just my 2 sen.

FIN.

This post has been edited by neoardi: Apr 25 2007, 12:18 PM

TV also got fanboys....haix.....

hahahhaha but these are moderate ones, @ least their points and evidence sounds logical to back them up

Hehehe, welcome to the REAL world. Guess what, even kitchen knife has it fanboys/fangirls u know.

This post has been edited by neoardi: Apr 25 2007, 08:08 PM

OMG, wondering how they bash each other

Kitchen knife Fanboy A:My knife is sharper
Kitchen knife Fanboy B: NONO,yours knife with ugly design,mine one are more
cool looking and sharper then yours tons tons tons tons and
tons.
Sorry for off topic

This post has been edited by JayYeong39: Apr 25 2007, 08:21 PM

I think LCD technology is only good to use as PC monitor. To use as a tv, Plasma is the best choice , then again...LCD is good for gaming because the ability to handle static image better than plasma.

Most if not all Plasma TVs have the strobing effect like a sub-70Hz refresh rate CRT TVs (If your eyes/visual processing of your brain are fast enough)... While most LCDs light is based on the cold cathod refresh rate... which is at a very high rate .... faster than any human can perceive... That said some older sharp lcd panels do use a low refresh rate cold cathod that has the strobing effect.

This strobing effect is not obvious to everyone.. as some people can stand a 60Hz refresh tv/crt.

This post has been edited by BeastX: Apr 26 2007, 05:53 PM

IMO CRT FTW!