Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Tyre Reviews, What brand of tyres have you used?

views
     
6UE5T
post Oct 27 2017, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 27 2017, 04:12 PM)
Yeah. Only 50 which i think will affect the comfort which im looking for. I think it is quite the same price for Michelin Primacy SUV or less a little. Hmmm...im torn apart. Anyway, thanks for your suggestion. Conti probably i will KIV as it is quite noisy for me. So i will keep an eye for Goodyear F1A3. Still depend on pocket. Hahahaha!!
*
Michelin Primacy will not hold a candle to CSC5 in terms of performance but yeah probably Primacy will be a bit more silent.

F1A3 only available in 235/50/18 so smaller radius by about 6mm, so your ride height will be 6mm lower and your fender gap increase by the same too, plus your speedometer will also get overstated just a bit. Otherwise no other impact, you may even get better acceleration and FC due to using slightly smaller circumference tire. Note that F1A3 is still made in Germany so expect a premium price on it! laugh.gif
6UE5T
post Oct 27 2017, 05:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(19 Degree South @ Oct 27 2017, 04:42 PM)
Two years? What's your mileage at the moment? rm500 is dirt cheap!
*
Between 35-40k km now on the CSC5 but already going bald especially on the edges coz I often lean a bit hard on them during cornering! laugh.gif Maybe if driven more sensibly it will last a bit longer.
Yup it was damn good price which surprised me that time too hence I did not even think twice and bought them right away! smile.gif
6UE5T
post Oct 27 2017, 05:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 27 2017, 05:42 PM)
Ffffuuu...made in Germany then can save it. Our currency so weak now. No eyes to see
...
*
Well CSC5 is also made in European countries (Germany, Poland, Czech, etc.) but still somehow I could get good price back then (MYR already weak also). No harm just to check around, who knows maybe got some promotion.

What SUV are you driving btw?

This post has been edited by 6UE5T: Oct 27 2017, 05:51 PM
6UE5T
post Oct 27 2017, 06:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 27 2017, 05:58 PM)
No choice liao lo...poorfag like me cannot afford premium tyre.
2004 T. Harrier.
*
Another option which is much cheaper is Hankook V12 Evo 2, available in 235/50/18. This is also a pretty decent UHP tire with relatively much cheaper price for its performance capability so a good value for money. Should be cheaper than the mid range Michelin Primacy yet a higher category tire (UHP category).
6UE5T
post Oct 30 2017, 02:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 28 2017, 04:02 PM)
But Hankook V12 Evo 2 i read before the performance. Somehow this tire need to warm up, meaning need to drive certain mileage then only able to unleash its performance. When it is new, they say lack of grip, etc, etc. Btw, the review i read was Australian website. Michelin Primacy consider mid range huh? Didnt know that till now. Btw, mind to share what car u r driving? U seems quite an aggresive driver. tongue.gif
...
*
Many tires are like that, need certain run in mileage but should be no issue. Yes Primacy is Michelin mid range tire, similar to Conti MC5, BS Turanza etc2. Michelin's high performance tires are the Pilot Sport range (PS3/PS4/PS4S/PSS). I just drive normal sedan, an old Toyota Mark X.
6UE5T
post Oct 30 2017, 02:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 30 2017, 02:25 PM)
Mark X is powderful bro..seat inside once with 4 big sizes adult. Pickup no problem.

Hopefully Michelin Primacy SUV wun end up like Conti MX5 performace la...if not ayam sure sadding.
*
Biasa saja, nowadays already considered slow car. I'm also already a bit bored by it!
6UE5T
post Oct 31 2017, 10:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 30 2017, 05:10 PM)
Fuh...bangsawan man...so whats ur next target? Btw, mark x maintenance wise how? Like conti car?
*
Bangsawan drive Ferrari & Bentley la, mana ada only drive Mark X?! Next target, either Lancer Evo 8MR/9 or AMG A45 if got money which unfortunately still not! sweat.gif
Maintenance of Mark X is easy coz very reliable and not expensive, certainly way cheaper than European cars.
6UE5T
post Oct 31 2017, 04:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 31 2017, 11:42 AM)
Zaman apa still Evo kah? Tot they stop at version 10 right? Mcm no more progress liao. A45 is gooding mang.. love it everyway it looks.
*
Evo 8MR-9 were years 2003-2006, old cars but still a blast to drive and can easily rival today's modern cars' performance. I don't like most of new cars today, coz got too many electronics which complicate things. I like simpler cars but fun. There's a saying old is gold and to me these cars are. A45 IMHO is like a modern version of Evo.
6UE5T
post Nov 15 2017, 09:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(kaz14274 @ Nov 15 2017, 05:15 PM)
Heyya guys. Just need to ask noob question here. Is it okay to use different ratio tyres from what I'm currently using ? For example. Currently I'm on 235/45R17 but this ratio has very limited choices in the market but 225/45R17 can find lots of choices from diff makers. Is it advisable to use diff ratio then what is the default in use ?
*
Can still use just that not ideal. 225/45/is about 6mm thinner sidewall height than 235/45 profile which means:
1. Your actual meters (speed and distance) will be less than indicated on the dash (speedo/odometer are overstated).
2. Your ride comfort will be reduced as you will feel more of the road irregularities from less cushioning of the thinner tires.
3. Less traction as the tire is narrower by 1 cm.
4. Car height drops by 6mm and fender gaps increased by the same hence will look uglier.

On the plus side though, your FC and pick up might improve just a bit, and of course the tires should be cheaper.

QUOTE(19 Degree South @ Nov 15 2017, 06:54 PM)
How about from a 245 to 225? Is this drastic?
*
You'd sacrifice a lot more in traction. Still possible as long as your rims is not wider than 8.5jj but not recommended. If your rims is 9jj already then you cannot use 225 anymore but should stay with 245.

6UE5T
post Jan 20 2018, 11:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(byorj12 @ Jan 20 2018, 06:18 PM)
Hii, I am looking for tyres 225/45/18 (price within RM300 to 400). Any recommendations? Currently considering :
1) Falken ZE914 Ecorun
2) Dunlop D05
3) GT Radial HPY
4) GT Radial GTX PRO

Which do you think will be the best choice among the top? Or any other recommendations? I see good reviews on Falken in tyrereviewuk.. but it seems like having mix good and bad reviews locally.. ???

Thanks
*
Forget about all those! Get the Hankook V12 Evo 2, definitely way much better than any of those above! Price should be below rm350/pc as example below:
https://www.mudah.my/Tayar+Baru+hankook+V12...18-56425462.htm
6UE5T
post Jan 24 2018, 11:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(byorj12 @ Jan 24 2018, 10:44 AM)
Thanks... Will definitely check out V12 Evo 2... I wonder why Falken have such good reviews in Tyrereview UK.. but i also see some bad reviews on Falken in Forum from Msia and Spore.. Wonder if it is different tyres in different region although same tyre model.. Now that you mentioned, I think V12 Evo 2 have good review in Tyrereview UK and a more consistent good review in forum from Msia and Spore as well... Thanks..

http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Falken/Z...E914-EcoRun.htm
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Falken/ZE914.htm
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Hankook/...us-V12-evo2.htm
*
The good Falken is their top of the line FK510 which is not yet available in MY market. The ZE914 is just a mid-range tire, not as good at that level either. You see those tests done by magazines whether from 2013 to the latest in 2017, this ZE914 mostly only ends up on the bottom half of the list, not anywhere on the upper half and that is also only comparison between the mid range tires, not yet top class performance tires. So yeah, not so good.
6UE5T
post Jan 24 2018, 11:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(djboycalvin @ Jan 23 2018, 02:14 PM)
many place also no stock.
cause this seller also no answer .. whatsapp also no reply ..

maybe too busy ..  rclxub.gif
*
Wah sorry then, not sure about that. Maybe try other sellers or just locate any Hankook shops from the Malaysia Hankook website.
6UE5T
post Feb 5 2018, 07:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(byorj12 @ Feb 5 2018, 02:36 PM)
Hi,
Finally decided to go with V12 Evo2.. Got it from a seller near Kemuning area for around RM360 (all in)..  Can feel the tyres are more quiet and softer compare to old Falken.. So far so good.. Thanks.

Thanks
*
You're welcome, good to hear that! smile.gif
6UE5T
post Feb 10 2018, 11:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(andreas @ Feb 10 2018, 10:49 PM)
Hi, need your opinion, currently using advan fleva for 40k km.everything is enough for me except this tyre lack rim protection.

Will change new tyre soon.prefer good rim protection n good aquaplanning n wet grip. Previosly use maxxis ipro, rim protection is great but really noisy.Quoted rm300 for v12e2 n f1 gsd5 310. On 204 45 17. Also prefer tyre that more softer sidewall.. which one better choice?
*
If you want more rim protection, V12E2 does not have much while the F1D5 has much better rims protection. However in terms of overall performance the V12E2 is better. Both has pretty comfortable sidewall.
6UE5T
post Feb 12 2018, 02:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(andreas @ Feb 12 2018, 11:31 AM)
Tq for for ur respond...do u know any other tyre except maxxis ipro n f1 d5 that has prominent rim protector?tq in advance.
*
Continental CSC5/3, Goodyear F1A2/3. Michelin PS3 also got some.
6UE5T
post Feb 19 2018, 04:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(eddyann @ Feb 19 2018, 09:28 AM)
any recommended a 1 step upgrade from my MC5? any good brand will do, so many to choose from but I need a real review
*
Upgrade 1 step from MC5 means go UHP tire category which is a wise decision. What size do you need though?
6UE5T
post Feb 19 2018, 06:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(eddyann @ Feb 19 2018, 05:46 PM)
small size 205/50/16
*
Then you only have these choices:

- Michelin PS4: the best choice available and consequently the most expensive, very well balanced for excellent dry & wet performance.

- Michelin PS3: the older version of PS4, still also pretty good and well balanced performance, especially in aquaplaning resistance (to go thru puddles). Compared to PS4 though it's already behind especially in dry grip but maybe a bit more comfortable coz sidewall slightly softer than PS4.

- Goodyear F1D5: performs very close to the PS3, also well balanced for both dry & wet.

- Bridgestone RE003: more focused towards dry grip with lesser wet performance compared to the above tires. This tire also will wear off the soonest coz tread wear rating is only 220 compared to the others at 300-320.

- Yokohama Advan Fleva V701: specs & tread pattern look good like the F1D5 but so far still unconvincing as there are many mixed reviews of this tire, some say ok but some not so good, even got some report of sidewall issue/bursting. In tests in Europe, it failed miserably! laugh.gif That's why I put this one as the last in the list.


6UE5T
post Feb 20 2018, 12:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(eddyann @ Feb 19 2018, 10:59 PM)
thanks, I have tried before F1GSD3 (germany made) it was quite ok on wet tarmac. but the tire is a bit noisy
*
Well UHP tires are normally a bit noisier than mid range tires due to larger tread blocks and stickier compound. Actually got some UHP tires which are pretty silent like the Hankook V12 Evo 2 and Goodyear F1A2/3 but they are not available for your size.

QUOTE(eddyann @ Feb 19 2018, 11:00 PM)
anything from conti? MC6? before MC5, tried also CPC2 and CPC2E. I think CPC2 perform better than MC5
*
Nope, MC6 is not available for your size. CPC6 might have your size but somehow Continental Malaysia has not bring in yet, probably coz they substitute by the MC6. sad.gif Other UHP tires from Continental is the CSC5/6 series which are only available 17' & 19' upwards.

I think your best bet is the PS3/4. If price difference is minimal then just go with PS4.
6UE5T
post Feb 20 2018, 06:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Feb 20 2018, 01:01 PM)
My car requires size of 235 45 18. I prefer the Hankook v12 as it got good reviews on net. However it doesn’t have my size of 235.
Currently on factory given ps3, ride it around 89k km. List options are ps4 (a bit expensive), ps3, conti mc6 (brand new model) might have a try on mc6, cause it cheaper around 200+ per donut.
Is mc6 is recommended?
*
Yes unfortunately V12E2 or even S1E2 do not have for 235/45/18.

MC6 is still unknown if really good as claimed by Continental Malaysia, no true comparison yet with other top tires like PS3/4, F1A2/3, etc2. So I can say it's still unproven.

Huh your PS3 lasts until 89k km??? You must be a pretty slow and steady driver ya? smile.gif Then just buy PS3 again if really cannot afford PS4 (which I think you still CAN!) Other choice can be the Goodyear F1A3 but I doubt it's cheaper than PS4 coz it's still made in Germany. For what car btw, new Accord 2.4?

QUOTE(tolaktakjatuh @ Feb 20 2018, 04:09 PM)
Hi, right now im using stock tires Silverstone (195/55/r15), im deciding between Potenza re003 (RM230) and Hankook v12 evo2 (RM190). I travel Kedah-Johor every 3 months. Which would be a better choice?
*
V12E2 is better coz it lasts longer (tread wear rating 320), more well balanced for dry & wet (wet traction rating AA), and more proven globally against other top tires like PS4/F1A3/P Zero etc2. RE003 will wear out sooner (TW only 220), and more focused on dry grip (wet traction rating only A even though dry grip is excellent), plus it's more expensive than V12E2! I'm using the V12E2 now on my wife's car and absolutely happy with them.
6UE5T
post Feb 27 2018, 06:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(Darkcity212 @ Feb 27 2018, 05:50 PM)
Hi guys any review for landsail 588 UHP please?
*
Not really a UHP tire and not good performance, read the review below from Tire Review UK:

"Positive: Short braking distance in the wet and dry
Negative: Handling not good enough in the dry. Very weak aquaplaning resistance.
Overall: The Landsail LS588 UHP were surprisingly unbalanced. Braking in the wet was excellent, but handling very unstable. In addition, the tyre copes worse than the others with emergency manoeuvres and is quite susceptible to aquaplaning. On dry pavement they again quickly stopped the car, but had very slow response to steering. Lateral grip and stability are too weak for the optimal performance of a sharp manoeuvre at high speed. Because of their softness they demonstrated a high level of comfort, effectively absorbing road irregularities."

http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Landsail/LS588-UHP.htm

6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0679sec    0.88    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 03:47 AM