Yes, and it is furnished with a 32" TV, 2-door fridge, washing machine, aircons x3, kitchen cabinet, wardrobe. The rest such as beds/mattresses, sofas were damaged so I had the owner remove them.
The landlord runs his own company and is loaded with cash; but no owners enjoy leaving their units empty as they still need to serve the commitments such as loan-installments and maintenance fees. Having tenants to ensure the units are maintained is also a good idea as long as they are good tenants. The previous tenant was a Chinese mainlander that trashed the place, and the unit was left untenanted for about three months.
After the events at Domain 5 (The invasion and occupation of Domain 5 by the Chinese Mainlanders

) we started shopping around and realized that it is a renter's market. Many owners in Cyberjaya face these problems:
1. Prolonged vacancy of their units
2. Bad tenants (students, Chinese Mainlanders, or a combination of them)
3. Defaults by their past/current tenants
My wife and I on the other hand are professionals (accountant and consultant) with no kids. So we used these facts during the rental negotiation. To be honest we didn't get that great a deal compared to the other tenants here as they are renting for just a little more at RM1,200 to RM1,400. It is a renters' market now in Cyberjaya and I do not see it changing anytime soon. Properties in Cyberjaya were sold at future (unrealized) prices, and since the buyers bought them using mortgages they have to serve the loan regardless of the tenancy situation. I cannot disclose the exact location of my rental since I am still living here. But I would be happy to share once I leave the place as I have done so for Domain 5
Sorry, I am going to go on a
rant about property investment:
Basically those who bought units in Cyberjaya gambled and lost, now they are paying the price. Some are able to escape (by disposing the units for less than what they paid for and paying the bank the loan balance) but make no mistake, money have been lost, the financial mistakes they have made will remain forever in their books. It can be said that they would have ended better had they simply put the money in FD or ASB in cash.
a. In fact, if they had taken ASB financing for RM200,000, 30-year tenure, cancelling after 7 years (to account to investors that bought their units 7 years ago), at a financing rate of 4.85% and ASB return of 7.00% (this is less than the actual/historical return which is higher than 7.00%), they would have ended up with
RM150,000 today in cash.
b. If they had put their RM1,000 monthly loan commitments into FD at 3.5% p.a. return, for the past 7 years, they would have ended up with
RM95,000 today in cashc. Even though their money would have been stuck in the EPF, they would have benefited more by dumping their money into the fund and earn the ~5% p.a. returns
Property investment is crazy. I enjoy talking about these mistakes because most people/gurus would only talk about their successes, presenting a lopsided sense/idea of the risk/return ratio of property investment. It involves plenty of risks such as the variable-interest risks, has no guarantee of sustainable returns (tenants can leave, you may not find new tenants to fill the gap) and yet the return has been negative for a good number of investors. They might as well have done nothing (by just leaving their money in low-interest savings account) and they would have ended up in a better financial position
Believe there are many still blinded by greed and refused to accept the reality.