clemang is right

just a tool

dun see much diff with 2.5/3 frames
iso 100/200 and 6/10 megapixels

i'd buy D40 + SB400 flash. nice small combo. still cheaper than D40x

yeah.. better stick wit d40.. den upgrade to D2x

how much you brought for the full set?

---

Added on March 9, 2007, 9:57 pmwoww.. Sound like so pro ...

This post has been edited by bbtat: Mar 9 2007, 09:57 PM

bbtat..

i said "i'd buy" so i haven't bought it yet

i thougt u had
lol.. sorry u would

dun buy d40x, buy d40 n sb 600 instead...

well.. i feel better (lol) after reading u guys's comment on the d40x.. anyway... i am enjoying nicer shots coapred to my sone cybershot.. lol.

i am thinking of getting the sb400. me just started dslr...

the lowest price i can get is rm420. is that cheap

also say the kit lens for d80... 18-135mm (i think) going for rm900.. the shop claimed that someone just bought the body.. leaving the kit lens for sale.

i asked if i could trade in my d40 kit lens.. and she said..." d40 kit lens can be bought for around rm150 in the internet... u better keep it.." CB betul....

do u guys think it is a good buy for the d80 kit lens?

bbtat: I'm not. Just read up by my fav pro and i happen to agree with those parts 100%. He's already tried the prototypes. Loved it. But still prefers the D40.

Wifi_One: you're welcome. my suggestion is that u save for a 18-200mm VR. ur 18-55mm is a great lens. dun let the cheap price fool u. and its light and fun. bigger lenses add weight and makes ur weightless d40 not so fun =P
18-135 review


D200 enough lo. Lol. D2x too ex and big xD

Either D40 or D40x is good.. juz get either and start posting ur pic here..

D80 kit lens 18-135mm is very sharp
even sharper than 18-200mm

very light weight

but a bit shaky if u go up to 135mm haha

time for u to get 70-200, sharp, non potruding lens and stable

not me. i dun need it yet

sure u don't need.. buy buy buy

18-200 VR is sharp. U'll never see the difference with a 18-135 unless u blow it up real big (print posters) or ur more interested in lab tests than photography. 18-200 has VR. That means hand held great shots all (most of) the time. try that with a 18-135 w/o VR.
P.s. That means u'll never miss another shot due to 'no tripod' or 'can't get clear pic'. =P

and 18-200 VR means u'll probably only carry 1 lens everywhere u go for all ur needs. Say goodbye to big bulky 'photographers' bags and ur tripod. u dun need them.

Sinister: U R right! So do u wanna pay USD200 for the difference between good and good? =P

BTW, D40x prints great 8 foot (yes, thats 8 FOOT) posters. =P With the kit lens!! 18-55mm!!

Prices: "It comes as a body-only (about $729) , or kitted with the excellent 18-55mm lens (about $799), or kitted with both the 18-55mm and new 55-200mm VR lenses (about $999)" -kenrockwell.com-

That is NOT cheap... >.<

This post has been edited by polkiuj: Mar 13 2007, 01:05 AM

135mm shaky is when it's raining, you went down to 1/20 and there's a model posing all wet 20 feet away from you mah!

haha anyway still can get some great shots at 1/10

now no worry lark

how can anyone say the 18-55 is an excellent lens?
well, if it is rm 200, then it's a good lens.
rm 50, then it's excellent

18-55mm ED II
at least sharper than canon KIT

if u get d 18-55 f2.8.. it's an execellent lens..