QUOTE(e-lite @ Nov 5 2020, 12:29 AM)
Why do you prefer low-saps as a good feature? I personally prefer my oils to be high-saps to combat the lower fuel grade we have here in Malaysia
First off , it is misleading of Aisin claiming 'Low SaPS' for its Aisin PAO+Ester 5W40 and 5W30 , IMO .Its packaging claims ACEA A3B4 however , which are contradictory .
'Low SaPS' is found in ACEA C1 and C4 for SaPS content at 0.5 and below .
ACEA A3B4 (as per packaging) spec is for SaPS content between 1.0 and 1.6 .
I wish to speculate Aisin is meant to claim in its PDS 'Mid-SaPS' which supposedly falls under ACEA C2/C3 and C5 whose permitted SaPS is 0.8 and below .
Now, why do I prefer low/mid-SaPS features ?
From my readings of numerous Used Oil Analyses from Bitog/Russia , I found low/mid SaPS oils C3 etc generally perform equally well if not better in wear metal counts .
It also seems to perform better IMO , in extended oil change intervals beyond 16,000 km .
However, I do realise quite a majority of Bitogers doesn't agree so .
Moreover , I had seen several blotter oil spot tests of mid-SaPS C3 (or claimed C3) as generally far superior than that of high SaPS oils like ACEA A3B3,A3B4 and most API SN/SM oils .
At the end of the day , the proof of the puddings is in the eating .
This post has been edited by zeng: Nov 6 2020, 11:33 AM
Nov 6 2020, 11:29 AM

Quote
0.0314sec
0.36
6 queries
GZIP Disabled