Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Camera for travel, as per title

views
     
dvlzplayground
post Mar 11 2017, 10:52 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(holyghost @ Mar 11 2017, 09:57 AM)
is the 2.9x optical zoom on the rx100 M3 enough?

thinking to get the mark 3 now although above initial budget. Cause it seems to fit everything I asking for. Compact size, 180 degree tilt screen, low light, some manual functions to play a round for different effects and i believe it will last me several years before it become truly obsolete. Only concern now is the zoom. Reviews I read doesnt seem to comment on the zoom. Can RX100 users share your views?
*
zooms needs are widely different depending on what you normally shoot. landscape / architecture shooters will prefer wide angles, sports will prefer the opposite, etc.

24-70mm range is a probably the best 'all-rounder'. in fact, most DSLRs / mirrorless are normally sold with lenses of this range. another good thing about not having a long zoom is it will train you to move closer to your subject ("zoom with your feet"), which usually results in a better composition smile.gif
feekle
post Mar 11 2017, 11:30 AM

Bibo ergo sum!
******
Senior Member
1,922 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Constellation Cygnus
sony A6000 is still worth to get?
Everdying
post Mar 11 2017, 12:24 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(holyghost @ Mar 11 2017, 09:57 AM)
is the 2.9x optical zoom on the rx100 M3 enough?

thinking to get the mark 3 now although above initial budget. Cause it seems to fit everything I asking for. Compact size, 180 degree tilt screen, low light, some manual functions to play a round for different effects and i believe it will last me several years before it become truly obsolete. Only concern now is the zoom. Reviews I read doesnt seem to comment on the zoom. Can RX100 users share your views?
*
yes, get the mk3.
the wider aperture at the long end is better than the minimal increase in zoom of the mk2.
just go walk 2-3 steps in front only.
dvlzplayground
post Mar 11 2017, 01:02 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(feekle @ Mar 11 2017, 11:30 AM)
sony A6000 is still worth to get?
*
i still think it's the best value in the market right now tongue.gif heck, the price even gone up slightly.. that should tell you how good it is haha.

obviously A6300 and A6500 are better if you can afford it, but most of the improvements are for video.
Loseeker
post Mar 11 2017, 01:27 PM

Apa Macam
*****
Senior Member
899 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: The Land of Smile
QUOTE(feekle @ Mar 11 2017, 11:30 AM)
sony A6000 is still worth to get?
*
Yes, it is. The price has gone up a little bit, but that's due to our currency weaken. If you get it from Kldslr.com, they have cash rebate, which will bring the price back down closer to what was before.
-kytz-
post Mar 11 2017, 02:19 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(feekle @ Mar 11 2017, 11:30 AM)
sony A6000 is still worth to get?
*
Yes. It still has the same image quality as the A6300 and the much more expensive A6500..

Also, most people (the general public) will hardly ever utilise the camera, most just point and shoot smile.gif
leyyy
post Mar 14 2017, 04:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur
hi guys, sorry i'm a newbie here and i would like to ask for advice on which camera to get ^^" i'm currently using my gopro and iphone for my travel photos but sometimes i'm not satisfied with the outcome of the photos.. doh.gif

If my budget were to be anything below 3.5k, may i know what are the recommended cameras that i should get? I'm looking for a travel camera that's light, compact and don't require interchangeable lens. I don't mind second hand as well.

From the thread here it seems that A6000 or Fujifilm X70 is a good choice? I personally like the outlook of Fujifilm cameras. Heard their colour is amazing biggrin.gif

DaddyO
post Mar 14 2017, 05:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 11 2017, 02:19 PM)
Yes. It still has the same image quality as the A6300 and the much more expensive A6500..

Also, most people (the general public) will hardly ever utilise the camera, most just point and shoot smile.gif
*
Iso performance on a6300 actually much better. A6000 has strange reddish hue when you snap with high iso and crank up the exposure at pp.

DaddyO
post Mar 14 2017, 05:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(leyyy @ Mar 14 2017, 04:18 PM)
hi guys, sorry i'm a newbie here and i would like to ask for advice on which camera to get ^^" i'm currently using my gopro and iphone for my travel photos but sometimes i'm not satisfied with the outcome of the photos.. doh.gif

If my budget were to be anything below 3.5k, may i know what are the recommended cameras that i should get? I'm looking for a travel camera that's light, compact and don't require interchangeable lens. I don't mind second hand as well.

From the thread here it seems that A6000 or Fujifilm X70 is a good choice? I personally like the outlook of Fujifilm cameras. Heard their colour is amazing biggrin.gif
*

Fuji x70 be better. Or get a6000 and pair with 35mm or 20mm primes. Thats the short less hassle answer.
ywsx
post Mar 15 2017, 10:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
anybody here can share review on Panasonic G7 ? Was thinking of getting one as my travel camera.
dvlzplayground
post Mar 15 2017, 10:38 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(leyyy @ Mar 14 2017, 04:18 PM)
hi guys, sorry i'm a newbie here and i would like to ask for advice on which camera to get ^^" i'm currently using my gopro and iphone for my travel photos but sometimes i'm not satisfied with the outcome of the photos.. doh.gif

If my budget were to be anything below 3.5k, may i know what are the recommended cameras that i should get? I'm looking for a travel camera that's light, compact and don't require interchangeable lens. I don't mind second hand as well.

From the thread here it seems that A6000 or Fujifilm X70 is a good choice? I personally like the outlook of Fujifilm cameras. Heard their colour is amazing biggrin.gif
*
if you dont require interchangeable lenses then X70 is better smile.gif i recommend to get maybe 1 or 2 extra batteries as well.

personally i would vote for the X100S because i prefer the 35mm (equiv) lens and viewfinder. but you dont get the touch-enabled tilt-screen.
leyyy
post Mar 16 2017, 09:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(DaddyO @ Mar 14 2017, 05:24 PM)
Fuji x70 be better. Or get a6000 and pair with 35mm or 20mm primes. Thats the short less hassle answer.
*
QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Mar 15 2017, 10:38 AM)
if you dont require interchangeable lenses then X70 is better smile.gif i recommend to get maybe 1 or 2 extra batteries as well.

personally i would vote for the X100S because i prefer the 35mm (equiv) lens and viewfinder. but you dont get the touch-enabled tilt-screen.
*
Thanks for the comments! Would probably go check out the X70 this weekend biggrin.gif I was taking the X100S into consideration as well but not sure if i can cope well with the prime lens.

5 Pages « < 3 4 5Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.64    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:30 AM