QUOTE(contestchris @ Jan 10 2017, 01:34 AM)
Guys, I just noticed that the funds using foreign mother funds are all lagged one day behind the stated NAV date. Like for example, the US markets are still open yet there is a price for the Schroeder Small and Mid-Cap Fund used by the RHB US Focus Equity Fund for the date of 9 Jan 2016, which should be impossible. This is true for all RHB, CIMB, TA etc funds that are based on a foreign mother fund.
So, essentially when the date is stated as 9 Jan, it is actually showing the results from 6 Jan.
However, this is not true for purely local in-house operated funds, be they Malaysian or SEA/APAC/Asian funds.
Just thought this is an interesting thing to share with you all.
I noticed that a while ago when I tried to use stock index to correlate to fund performance. So, essentially when the date is stated as 9 Jan, it is actually showing the results from 6 Jan.
However, this is not true for purely local in-house operated funds, be they Malaysian or SEA/APAC/Asian funds.
Just thought this is an interesting thing to share with you all.
I thought the correlation was bad, but no, it was due to this lagging.
Is it something could be utilized towards our advantage ?
Jan 10 2017, 06:56 AM

Quote
0.1515sec
0.35
7 queries
GZIP Disabled