Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Discussion : Latency problems with WoW

views
     
TSmyremi
post Feb 9 2007, 07:21 AM, updated 14y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak



I've shifted the post out of LYN to a free wiki page so that players can help with the editing. All they need to do is create an account with pbworks.com and just edit on the wiki with the new information. The link to the wiki is below :

http://wowstreamyxconnections.pbworks.com

This thread will remain as discussions for problems ppl are facing with in-game latency when on Streamyx lines.

This post has been edited by myremi: Jul 27 2009, 12:12 PM
Bliss8099
post Feb 9 2007, 10:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


Kuala Lumpur - Bangsar

218.111.xxx.xxx
219.94.xxx.xxx

Good latency usually 200-400+ MS
eternallove
post Feb 9 2007, 11:08 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
Penang

218.208.*,219.95.***(3digit) (you can get 218.208 at around 10am~4pm only)
only playable at morning,600~1000ms after3~5pm or so.


219.95.* ,219.95.** ,60.49.*.
unplayable.

This post has been edited by eternallove: Feb 9 2007, 11:08 AM
TSmyremi
post Feb 9 2007, 01:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


eternallove, which area in penang are you at? might be helpful to know since certain areas may lag worst than others.
TristanX
post Feb 10 2007, 01:51 AM

Where is my stars?
Group Icon
Elite
23,662 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur


Currently lagging like hell for all other IPs at Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. Can't get 218.111.xxx.xxx at this time.
eternallove
post Feb 10 2007, 05:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
>myremi

Air itam,penang..
patalim
post Feb 10 2007, 12:33 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


JB

60.49.xxx.xxx is ok, bout 450 to 650, slows down after 7pm
60.50.xxx.xxx is bad, bout 500 to 800
218.111.xxx.xxx is the best, bout 400 to 500, good all day
60.52.xxx.xxx is the absolute worse, 1k and up

only other one i ever managed to get was 124.xxx.xxx.xxx. It was fast like 218 but i've only managed to get it once.

P.S. Speeds apply to Aman Thul, not sure bout thre rest

This post has been edited by patalim: Feb 10 2007, 12:33 PM
deodorant
post Feb 10 2007, 12:33 PM

Surfing LYN instead of Working.
*******
Senior Member
5,691 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Bandar Sungai Long:

60.48.x.x 90% of the time fairly good latency, 300-450ms.

[edit]
After 12midnight on saturday, 60.48.x.x starts to lag, by 1am I'm getting 1000-1500ms. Reconnect to 60.51.x.x also no difference.

This post has been edited by deodorant: Feb 11 2007, 01:11 AM
onephatcow
post Feb 11 2007, 01:40 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


Bangsar/Bukit Banadaraya - 60.50/49.......has been horrible late night this past week. After midnight, it tends to hover at or above 1000ms.

Kidicarus
post Feb 11 2007, 05:53 AM

Enthusiast
Group Icon
VIP
727 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


I'm a wow europe player so i don't expect to get the same ping as you US players. But ping after midnight has been horrible last 2 nights.

I normally ping my ventrilo server to check how fast my wow will run as both servers are located in the same place and I find that 218.111.17-18(lower numbers are usually better for me).xx usually gives the lowest latency.

PJ, SS3 btw.

I've been travelling a lot through the ASEAN region this past few weeks and i normally get pings to my vent server of about 220-270ms (that's in Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam). So i really don't see why TM can't get their act together and give us solid latency.

Tracert shows the problem is not with my exchange but further down the route. Ie.. the bottleneck is just before the packet leaves the TMnet exchange to the foreign router.

Tracing route to xx.xx.xx.xx over a maximum of 30 hops

1 112 ms 249 ms 62 ms 219.93.218.177

2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 219.93.216.149

3 15 ms 13 ms 15 ms 210.187.133.83

4 15 ms 14 ms 20 ms 58.27.124.50

5 15 ms 14 ms 15 ms 219.93.174.67

6 420 ms 421 ms 421 ms 219.94.9.46

7 499 ms 497 ms 499 ms ge0-1.linx.lon.rapidswitch.com [195.66.224.207]

8 499 ms 483 ms 499 ms ge-2-24.pup.mer.lon.rapidswitch [87.117.214.6]

9 484 ms 497 ms 499 ms xx.xx.xx.xx

Trace complete.


TSmyremi
post Feb 11 2007, 02:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


deo, where is Bandar Sungai Long?

(my ignorance is shining here. smile.gif )


Added on February 11, 2007, 2:38 pm
QUOTE(Kidicarus @ Feb 11 2007, 05:53 AM)

I've been travelling a lot through the ASEAN region this past few weeks and i normally get pings to my vent server of about 220-270ms (that's in Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam).  So i really don't see why TM can't get their act together and give us solid latency.

*
Singapore = rich and competitive so infrastruture setup is better. Annoying thing is that Telekom is one of the major shareholder of M1. Money should be channeled back here to fix their homeground system.

Thailand + Vietnam = not a lot of ppl on broadband I would think so lines are not full-up. Plus, probably got a better deal out of the international telcos than TMNet.

This post has been edited by myremi: Feb 11 2007, 02:38 PM
deodorant
post Feb 11 2007, 04:00 PM

Surfing LYN instead of Working.
*******
Senior Member
5,691 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


Bandar Sungai Long is near Kajang ... still in Klang Valley la. Anyway this morning with 60.48.x.x was fine, then after lunchtime the latency got worse and worse, 1000-ish ms. Tracert shows this:

Tracing route to us.logon.worldofwarcrft.com [209.85.51.151] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 7 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1
2 19 ms 14 ms 13 ms 219.93.218.177
3 12 ms 13 ms 13 ms 219.93.217.237
4 19 ms 13 ms 13 ms 210.187.129.139
5 19 ms 14 ms 13 ms 202.188.126.132
6 20 ms 13 ms 14 ms 58.27.124.42
7 18 ms 13 ms 13 ms 219.93.173.133
8 218 ms 212 ms 212 ms 219.93.153.150
9 217 ms 218 ms 220 ms g3-1.core01.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.12.1]
10 220 ms 213 ms 215 ms v3493.mpd01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.109]
11 219 ms 213 ms 221 ms g11-0-0.core01.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.6.90]
12 694 ms 716 ms 614 ms p14-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.237]
13 636 ms 716 ms 716 ms v3827.na22.b015619-0.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.65.110]
14 637 ms 614 ms 716 ms everyones-ineternet.demarc.cogentco.com [38.99.215.154]
15 637 ms 614 ms 614 ms gphou2-209-85-1-28.ev1servers.net [209.85.1.28]
16 632 ms 628 ms 602 ms gphou2-209-85-0-113.ev1servers.net [209.85.0.113]
17 618 ms 597 ms 625 ms 209-85-51-151.opticaljungle.com [209.85.51.151]

Trace complete.
TSmyremi
post Feb 11 2007, 07:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


ta deo. marah me also no use since I don't live in Kajang. tongue.gif

for 60.48.*, i think it's something lik 60.52.* i.e. fast in the morning but once afternoon hits, lags a lot.

This post has been edited by myremi: Feb 11 2007, 07:14 PM
Krovaxq
post Feb 11 2007, 09:34 PM

Single Ghost
*****
Senior Member
731 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



Shah Alam.

218.208.xxx --------> 300~450ms
218.111.xxx ---------> IMHO as fastest ever 200~300ms


219.95.xxx --------> WORST 1000~40000ms (lol trust me)
Panties
post Feb 12 2007, 12:39 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
Klang (Southern Park, Taman Chi Liung, Bukit Raja... )

Streamyx ~ 1Mbps Package

Tested on us.logon.worldofwarcraft.com


218.208.*.* (24/7) - anytime, most areas, giving 200-400~500ms rclxms.gif

219.95.*.* (24/7) - anytime, most areas, giving 1000-2000~9999ms cry.gif

Trust me, both above me, are Truth!

Similar to the post, like Shah Alam...

However, 218.111.xxx - Havent tried or gotten that IP address in Klang before...

^^ Gong Xi Fa Cai!
frega
post Feb 12 2007, 07:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
396 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Kepong area

218.111 is the best 300-500ms, I had that for a few days, constant good ping and regretted I turned off the computer last night. Almost impossible to get back, but I'm gonna keep trying.

218.208 is giving me 750-900ms now

219.94, 219.95, also giving me 800-1000ms with constant timeouts.
sanjikun
post Feb 13 2007, 04:01 AM

S.O.S Brigade Subordinate No. n
******
Senior Member
1,386 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya


Selangor (Subang Jaya)

no successful acquisition of ip 218-ish, so far throughout all my dc anc rc efforts, i couldnt get it, not even once...

219.95.** and 219.95.*** -ish ips are NOT playable. AT ALL. With loads of lag spikes, ping exceeding 20k, as well as constant disconnection...


TSmyremi
post Feb 13 2007, 07:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


Thanks guys.

frega, is kepong part of KL or Selangor? i've parked kepong under selangor but not sure since I'm not from there.
<* Star Dust *>
post Feb 13 2007, 09:50 AM

Mio Fever Syndrome
*******
Senior Member
2,357 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: somewhere beyond boundary


QUOTE(sanjikun @ Feb 13 2007, 04:01 AM)
Selangor (Subang Jaya)

no successful acquisition of ip 218-ish, so far throughout all my dc anc rc efforts, i couldnt get it, not even once...

219.95.** and 219.95.*** -ish ips are NOT playable. AT ALL. With loads of lag spikes, ping exceeding 20k, as well as constant disconnection...
*
i yesterday jus got 218.208.***.***...
but de ping didn't touch yellow zone but it's better den b4...
less than 1k ping... it's in between 600 - 900 ping...

i guess best ip for wow in subang would be 218.111.***.***
Krovaxq
post Feb 13 2007, 12:57 PM

Single Ghost
*****
Senior Member
731 posts

Joined: Jan 2007



agreed,

for shah alam,klang subang jaya and nearby other places the best is 218.111.xxx.xx , with 218.208 seconds...

but 219.95. is TOTALLY no WOW...as that was the reason why i quit WOW last time, but givin it another shot of try tongue.gif

40 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0193sec    0.16    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 10:41 PM