Currently lagging like hell for all other IPs at Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. Can't get 218.111.xxx.xxx at this time.
Discussion : Latency problems with WoW
Discussion : Latency problems with WoW
|
|
Feb 10 2007, 01:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Currently lagging like hell for all other IPs at Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. Can't get 218.111.xxx.xxx at this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2007, 02:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
218.111 is already lagging for 2 hours on Illidan at this time.
|
|
|
Mar 6 2007, 10:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Yup, 218.111.xxx.xxx is laggy since 4pm on Illidan. Switched to 219.94.xxx.xxx and it has no lag.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Mar 6 2007, 10:26 PM |
|
|
Mar 26 2007, 01:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
All IP lags atm. 219.94.xxx.xxx is the best but it has 800-1100ms ping. It's consistant though.
|
|
|
Apr 18 2007, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Using 219.94.xxx.xxx at Setapak. Low lag spikes but it's still the most consistant for me.
|
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 07:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
219.94 is still the best for Setapak. Currently playing around 300-700ms on Illidan. It lagged for an hour or 2 and now it's back to normal.
Edit: Lag mode ON at 9.30pm. 800-1500ms atm This post has been edited by TristanX: Jun 4 2007, 09:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 06:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Connection back to normal for 219.94 on Illidan for Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. 200-600ms atm.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Jun 11 2007, 10:34 AM |
|
|
Jul 10 2007, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
TMNut Streamyx is back with their lag at 12.30am with
800-2400ms ping for 219.94 at Setapak 218.208 is 1000+ms 218.111 and 219.95 is unplayable and didn't bothered to look at the ping Lag gone for 219.94 at 11am. This post has been edited by TristanX: Jul 10 2007, 10:48 PM |
|
|
Jul 11 2007, 02:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Is Iburst good?
This post has been edited by TristanX: Jul 11 2007, 02:33 PM |
|
|
Aug 17 2007, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
All IPs lagging since 7pm at 800-1100ms at Setapak. sigh
|
|
|
Aug 18 2007, 09:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
Lag gone on all IPs since 1am for Setapak.
This post has been edited by TristanX: Aug 18 2007, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Aug 22 2007, 10:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
All IPs are lagging in Setapak again. Sigh
Edit: Back to normal after 10am. This post has been edited by TristanX: Aug 23 2007, 04:13 PM |
|
|
Aug 28 2007, 07:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Elite
24,328 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur |
219.94 is still the best connection for Setapak. 219.95, 218.111 and 218.208 having ridiculous lag at 10am.
Edit: 13/9: 219.94 is lagging. 219.95 has no lag atm Edit: 17/9: Seems like every IP has no lag. Setapak IPs = 219.95, 219.94, 218.111 and 218.208 This post has been edited by TristanX: Sep 17 2007, 12:44 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0163sec
0.74
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 11:59 AM |