haha why developer staffs come in forum will be damn low class act? in fact i like them to be more active in forum.... last time Lowyat did the same for their BTP project.... too bad tak ada liao... now the riyang thread is very informative because of the developer staffs responses... hahaa

Lol! Good point. Just that I tends to be distrustful in this type of situation.

Listing a Project Director and Marketing Manager to answer Q&A, hmmm....

next thing is once they come in they better don't quit.
i already pose them some question.
hopefully they don't siam.
else .....

Not low class because developer staffs come in forum but low class as in threatening kind of post.

Should do like Riyang mah. Damn professional and courteous.

Yup, saw your questions on Citizen thread.

hopefully either the project director or marketing manager answer.

you should quickly tagged those disgruntled souls in green residence.
bet they tonnes of questions.

see whether owners they made false allegations or not.

Lol! mai lah, mai lah.

Later kena report from "binastra" employee to the admin

Our post is intended only to create an official channel for any genuine doubts, concerns or grievances to be properly addressed and resolved with the right source. Any statements which are speculative in nature or otherwise baseless remarks that are likely to harm the other's reputation is unwelcome in this forum or elsewhere.
If you have any genuine queries about our project, please direct them to us and you will appreciate that we do our best to provide you the right answers.
In respect of speculations and wild remarks, we will not tolerate any such in future and will not hesitate to take appropriate actions against those who negligently or intentionally publishes or repeats them in this forum or elsewhere.

care to share what are the allegations and wild remarks?
so far readers have no clue as to what precisely are the items being distorted without the official channel clarifying.

and while you are at that, would appreciate you enlightening the questions post about binastra project in the citizen thread.

cheers!

Forum is a avenue for the forumners to share and offer alternate views and opinions. And it is a public space. Developer's rep I guess are most welcome to participate and engage with the forumners to clarify any issues which may misrepresented. Anyway... most forumners here are very mature adult... If they are interested in the project, they will clarify all the points anyway.... Just look at Riyang where developer's rep answer all questions professionally.....

If want to play in Kitchen, must tahan the fire lor. If you think any facts are not correctly pointed out, you point it out lor with correct facts...

Personally, I will not buy any products from company who take hard stand and threat a legal action who think otherwise than them. It shows the narrow minded of the people up there.

Btw, above is general statement and not construed as malicious accusation of any parties or person.

Cheerios.

Answer kochin gor lah, big developer!

To mention a few misleading statements in the forum:

1. @alextyw85 @ June 4 2017, 09:42 PM implying that the developer short changing buyers by 78square feet of space in its Type B unit.
Secondly, implying that the developer is trying to cover up the shortfall by adding the car park space into the main parcel area.

2. @ IIIaZer Jun 1 2017, 03:34 AM implying not only that the service charge is excessive but also the car park area is taken into account in calculating the service charge: "actual maintenance fee is $349.96 + $34.99 (10% for car park)".

All the above statements are clearly false.

For example, i) there are already proposed layout plans readily available for @alextyw85 to check. Type A is 9600 x 8750 whereas Type B is 10500 x 9600. Type B dimension is much wider ii) @alextyw85 himself admits that the car park area can't be added to the main parcel area "this is my first time heard car park is part of the sf". Why in spite of his belief, he alleging the developer of trying to mislead the buyer by adding the car park space to make up for the 'missing 78 square feet' iii) under the law, service charge is always charged in proportion to the buyers share units in the parcel NOT the car park iv) the 39.6 cents charge is for service charge and sinking funds. This is only an indicative figure based on current market value for maintaining the number of facilities as provided in the proposed development. Under the New Strata Laws, strata titles are passed to purchasers before/upon delivery of vacant possession. The intention of the New Act is to ensure that the purchasers takes over control of management of the common property from the developer immediately as soon as the property is handed to them. After that it's up to the residents to decide who to appoint to manage the common area and how much is the appropriate service charge.

All the above misstatements can easily clarified by contacting the developer. Unfortunately they were not therefore causing confusion.

We hope that all genuine buyers will respond positively to our post by contacting the right source to clarify any doubt.

We will take action against those deliberately who negligently or deliberately disseminating false information in this forum or elsewhere. Thank
You.

Property Focus
Why your printed material such as your own calendars indicate such facade scheme but your actual is doing another?




Attached thumbnail(s)

You are welcome to discuss the technical matter with our management.
Binastra Land Sdn Bhd
No.1 & 3, Jalan Jalil Jaya 3,
Jalil Link,
Bukit Jalil,
57000 Kuala Lumpur.

boss, got check whether the printed material contain words "for illustration purpose only" or not?

Of course got lah.
But that where the separate the boys from the men

It's a legitimate and genuine concern of citizen buyers and prospect and I believe a open response to all is more than welcomed. Why should it be a personal response? Why not share to all here?

Is this a developer sponsor thread?

If it is a matter that concerns our buyer, rifgjtfully the developer's office should be the right avenue not public forum.

Fine. Kindly state the rightful person to attend to all queries then please.
Steven?
Cindy?
Or ????

why not publish their landlines here or emails as well.

Thanks