QUOTE(river.sand @ Dec 8 2016, 05:25 PM)
We discussed this topic before. There are several reasons why US ETF tend to beat actively managed funds:
1. Fees are higher for actively managed funds
2. US funds include many pension funds, which tend to be more conservative.
(Peter Lynch mentioned this in his book.)
3. ETF's performance depends on investors' sentiment and confidence. See the attached diagram.
Now, comparing US and Malaysia:
Factor #1 - applicable to Malaysia too.
Factor #2 - applicable to Malaysia too, but you can certainly pick the more aggressive funds.
Factor #3 - not happening in Malaysia, yet.
I agreed with u. Have u started in us etf ? I m interested.1. Fees are higher for actively managed funds
2. US funds include many pension funds, which tend to be more conservative.
(Peter Lynch mentioned this in his book.)
3. ETF's performance depends on investors' sentiment and confidence. See the attached diagram.
Now, comparing US and Malaysia:
Factor #1 - applicable to Malaysia too.
Factor #2 - applicable to Malaysia too, but you can certainly pick the more aggressive funds.
Factor #3 - not happening in Malaysia, yet.
Dec 8 2016, 05:36 PM

Quote
0.1047sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled