QUOTE(dasecret @ Dec 13 2016, 11:44 AM)
Has it ever occur to you that if you think you can do a better job than the fund manager, you should not let the fund manager earn the 1.5% p.a. management fee from you?
There are many factors to be considered when the markets fell sharply and you are caught offguard, reducing exposure significantly would mean taking significant amount of realised loss as well
Honestly, I don't know how to do the fund manager's job so I'd just let them do theirs and compared the fund manager's performance to their peers every now and then to decide if this is still the fund manager I want to stick to
Actually if Ponzi 2 can reduce exposure to Malaysia to only about 1%, I can't see why Ponzi 1 cannot. There are other Asia Pacific countries out there. Why overweight in Malaysia? There are many factors to be considered when the markets fell sharply and you are caught offguard, reducing exposure significantly would mean taking significant amount of realised loss as well
Honestly, I don't know how to do the fund manager's job so I'd just let them do theirs and compared the fund manager's performance to their peers every now and then to decide if this is still the fund manager I want to stick to
This post has been edited by Ramjade: Dec 13 2016, 11:51 AM
Dec 13 2016, 11:50 AM

Quote
0.3427sec
0.17
7 queries
GZIP Disabled