1Gb RAM or 2x 512MB ?, got diff on performance???
1Gb RAM or 2x 512MB ?, got diff on performance???
|
|
Jan 27 2007, 03:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
658 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
If I were you, I would pop in 1 x 1GB first, then another 1GB when I have enough money. It's hard for me to earn money so have to spend wise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 02:16 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
25 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(civic98 @ Jan 26 2007, 12:26 PM) I'm using Corsair, no problems but there are people here against Corsair, maybe I'm the lucky one. hai,I think Kingston RAM prices came down, the 1GB is less than RM350 if not mistaken, while Corsair is still around RM395. Does the RAM mention above compatible with Mac Mini ( intel chipset )? Any idea where can i source those RAM? Thanks. |
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 06:57 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
95 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Ukay Perdana, Ampang |
now Im using 1x1GB 667mhz by corsair replace to 256mb x 2 on my Macbook. To tell the truth, using 1 slot show much slower performance than using both of it. Agree?
|
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 07:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
935 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
but using a 512mbx2 u have no choice but to have the max cap of 1024 mb ram
1gb ram can add aditional 1gb ram so it will be faster |
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 07:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Langkawi |
Just put in one 1GB and leave the other 256MB there, nothing wrong with it. In total you have 1.25GB which is pretty good!
|
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 07:30 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
hahahaa...1 shot 2 gb is really taxing for most ppl.
Currenly with the stock 512 mb , ifeel the speed is still fine if there's no multitasking. if there's really multi tasking, i can really feeel the need for waiting. Will pop in a 1gb by next week . |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2007, 08:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
307 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Penang, Malaysia |
Well, actually, the performance of dual channel will be more significant if you use it in MacBook or MacMini which uses shared graphic. For iMac or MacBook Pro, seriously, no difference.
|
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 01:35 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
is the differece really that big until i can feel it ???
|
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 01:44 AM
|
|
VIP
9,511 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
QUOTE(rhesusv @ Jan 29 2007, 02:35 AM) Yes, if u have 512mb ram only, u can feel the difference of its running in dual channel or single channel..but if 1GB ram and above, you wont feel much different unless u run heavy applications + multitasking a lot of time. |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 02:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
164 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
dual channels works best if both rams are of the same model chips...
similar to dual channel performance ram for PCs bundled together... but one shot 800 bucks pokai lor..... i'm usin dell insp 6000 dual channel wif 1Gb + 256Mb....running fine... u wan faster boot time... use apps to load boot/startup/system files on memory... even so, wen i upgrade to 2Gb, i'll sell my current 1Gb and get 2 new 1Gb sticks.... definitely minimize compatibility issues.... sayin tht i feel like wanna get a new laptop altogether....heheheheh.... |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 03:09 AM
|
|
VIP
9,511 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
QUOTE(greddy @ Jan 29 2007, 03:04 AM) dual channels works best if both rams are of the same model chips... mac os x boot time is fast enough.. c.f. to windows XP.similar to dual channel performance ram for PCs bundled together... but one shot 800 bucks pokai lor..... i'm usin dell insp 6000 dual channel wif 1Gb + 256Mb....running fine... u wan faster boot time... use apps to load boot/startup/system files on memory... even so, wen i upgrade to 2Gb, i'll sell my current 1Gb and get 2 new 1Gb sticks.... definitely minimize compatibility issues.... sayin tht i feel like wanna get a new laptop altogether....heheheheh.... |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 11:29 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
182 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(youngkies @ Jan 29 2007, 01:44 AM) Yes, if u have 512mb ram only, u can feel the difference of its running in dual channel or single channel.. so you mean that if i use a 1gb + 256 mb ram will be faster than 512mb x 2 ??? but if 1GB ram and above, you wont feel much different unless u run heavy applications + multitasking a lot of time. |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 11:55 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
232 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 12:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,963 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: KL |
QUOTE(76radius @ Jan 29 2007, 11:55 AM) I just upgraded mine to 2GB. No diff compared to my previous setting 2 x 512mb setting, except for the photoshop la. Ofcourse la...Imagine a highway that have 5 lanes, but only have 10 cars....(2GB) Then imagine a highway tat have 2 lanes, and 10 cars (512x2) Anyway...back to the question... 1GB logically will run slower than 512x2 dual channel......But u can hardly see the difference...... And no matter what, i will advise u to get 1GB instead for 512x2 if u have intention to add until 2GB later time, it will be more benefit.... |
|
|
Jan 29 2007, 11:26 PM
|
|
VIP
9,511 posts Joined: Apr 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 01:46 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
hey guys. i just bought a kingston 1GB from lowyat (the shop at the back on IT floor that sells macs). he convinced me to get the KTA RAM for mac which costs RM630.. much more expensive than the normal ram. he said the performance is much better..
I've paid of course but i want to know if it's true or he's just bull shitting me. anyone care to clarify? This post has been edited by seok: Jan 31 2007, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 01:56 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
77 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
wow... RM630 for a 1GB RAM. That's pretty hard for me to swallowed....
|
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 02:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,255 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Langkawi |
QUOTE(seok @ Jan 31 2007, 01:46 PM) hey guys. i just bought a kingston 1GB from lowyat (the shop at the back on IT floor that sells macs). he convinced me to get the KTA RAM for mac which costs RM630.. much more expensive than the normal ram. he said the performance is much better.. You should ask him whether the 1GB KTA is faster compared to 2GB normal RAM, cause at that price you could have bought 2GB.I've paid of course but i want to know if it's true or he's just bull shitting me. anyone care to clarify? |
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 02:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,506 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(seok @ Jan 31 2007, 02:46 PM) hey guys. i just bought a kingston 1GB from lowyat (the shop at the back on IT floor that sells macs). he convinced me to get the KTA RAM for mac which costs RM630.. much more expensive than the normal ram. he said the performance is much better.. Ouch.. Guess you been cheated/punk I've paid of course but i want to know if it's true or he's just bull shitting me. anyone care to clarify? |
|
|
Jan 31 2007, 04:26 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
he said KTA is more stable for Mac.. value ram crashes a lot especially with heavy tasks load like photoshop/final cut/etc..
true true?? *sob. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0160sec
0.45
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 11:35 PM |