Attached thumbnail(s)
The watch thread v13!
The watch thread v13!
|
|
May 22 2020, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 5 2020, 02:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2020, 09:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 3 2020, 06:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ck77 @ Aug 3 2020, 06:23 PM) Have the vintage 1171 and probably I’ll get the us mexico 2 reasons I avoided getting an Omega 1171 - cost, and some say the 633 endlinks don't fit the SM300 well and needs to be filed down to size.https://www.uncleseiko.com/store/p215/Beads...n_Watch%22.html I also have an Omega 20mm mesh bracelet somewhere at home (apparently even bracelet prices appreciate I got a promo code with my US1171 btw, happy to PM you if you're looking at getting a US. This post has been edited by Chinoz: Aug 3 2020, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Aug 7 2020, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
friedricetheman liked this post
|
|
|
Aug 8 2020, 12:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Probably a function of age as well.
Where before, a souped up Japanese hot hatch might be a perfect daily, we all move on towards Conti luxo barges as we age, since our backs are not getting any better haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 8 2020, 04:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
I did try one some gold/rose gold pieces at the shop before but it didn't match my skin tone well, so I've always stuck with SS (fortunately).
But to answer your original question, I grew up wearing a watch, so I see it more like putting on underwear rather than jewellery. I tend to go for under-the-radar pieces anyway so not much bling to begin with. |
|
|
Aug 30 2020, 11:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
If monetary considerations were taken out of the picture, my vote would go to the 202. It is a THE RO, the E-type, the 240Z, heck even the 2000GT of the watch world.
The right size, the right dial balance, the right proportions. Downside of the 202 is that: - service cost tends to be higher (I believe everything still needs to come out through the crystal?) - movement not as robust as the latest and greatest - no quick set date and no seconds hand, so depends on how OCD you are about setting the absolute right time/date With the 400/500, they have their quirks. The 400 was a right movement shoved into a wrong sized case, and that shows from the strange caseback proportions and date window placement and also the elongated hour markers. The 500, with its new c4302 movement, fixed that but it has now become thicker. I'm also not a fan of the new barren-look dial and the seconds hand. |
|
|
Sep 2 2020, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(subliminal_dreams @ Sep 1 2020, 06:24 PM) Hello all. So after some deliberations I decided to go for the 15500. I’ve heard the arguments for both, and although the purists out there would definitely gun for the 15202, at the end of the day it comes down to what really sings to your heart. While the Jumbo does wear large and it does *feel* good and definitely more comfortable than its larger-sized cousins, but it looks small and doesn’t look right on my wrist, in my eyes. I don’t believe in conforming to what others feel or think, so while we may snigger when seeing a scrawny dude sporting an oversized ROO or DSSD at the end of the day it’s his money and happiness. Congratulations on the new piece! I don't think you could've done wrong with either models in any case.QUOTE(friedricetheman @ Sep 2 2020, 12:51 PM) For collectors like myself, we don’t want artificial scarcity and inflated prices, as it would be a detriment to us completing our collections. I believe that the “shortage” has crept to other brands and this is not healthy to the long term viability of this hobby. The way I see it, what's good for the brand is good for the collectors as well.When I hear idiots talking about investing in watches, I smh due to the fact that watches, including Rolexes were considered depreciating assets just a decade ago. Not too long ago, when you walk out the dealer’s door with your brand new Rolex, and you will be taking a 10% depreciation hit on resale. APs fared worse with a 20-25% depreciation hit and 15202s were everywhere 3-4 years ago. Just my two cents. Young blood is always good for a brand's longevity and it greases the wheels to keep churning out good, reliable products down the road. Yes, some pieces in the range are unobtainium for now, but if you've been collecting for long enough, you'd know that trends come and go so it's only a matter of waiting it out. It also gives you an opportunity to look at other brands, which you may have previously overlooked because you were silo-ed into looking into any one particular brand/range (this is my own experience). What's happening today is unfortunate for collectors who might only add one piece every 5-10 years due to having a mature enough stable. But this lot of people also know what they're after and don't have to go on chasing every other hot model in town. My personal pet peeve is seeing someone with an arm full of 6-digit SS refs and proclaiming how they've been in love with the brand since like forever |
|
|
Sep 13 2020, 01:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2020, 07:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2020, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2020, 06:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(pleasuresaurus @ Sep 15 2020, 11:43 AM) sounds good man, thanks. seems they also do rolex repairs. how does this sit in with the whole idea of rolex frowning upon 3rd party intervention into their products i wonder? seems quite a lot of places do service rolexes. i reckon this particular establishment is reputable and wouldn't shortchange customers by scavenging parts and what not, but does it affect the record/integrity/recognition (for lack of better word) of the watch itself moving forward? Imo if it's just a regular service, nothing wrong with it being done by a reputable watchmaker.You hear horror stories of people sending in their watches to rsc with strict do not polish instructions, and it still comes back shiny and new. Or the one where an all-original vintage goes in and comes out shiny and new with service parts. If it's a modern 6-digit, I would stick with rsc, since service papers will help with any eventual sale too (although they're still so new, it shouldn't need a visit to rsc yet). But 4-digits (and 5-digits not far behind) ref, you'll have to weigh up your options. I say all this on the assumption that you know a reputable watchmaker who knows what they're doing. This post has been edited by Chinoz: Sep 15 2020, 06:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 15 2020, 11:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(pleasuresaurus @ Sep 15 2020, 09:50 PM) Ya mang, especially for them vintage pieces, its like literally paying to get the watch devalued. Whatever happened to the notion of historically sympathetic servicing? Unnecessary or unrequested stuff added to the work order - like sapphire crystal swaps, hand changes, polishing when strictly told not to as u said. 1st paragraph - yes and no.I suppose that's the key issue la kan, finding somebody u can trust who not only knows what they're doing, but also not to rip you off. More and more I'm feeling that the rolex ownership experience isnt all that already la. AD staff aren't exactly welcoming (i know some of u have established great relationships with them, good on u) getting the watch is a pain, maintaining can end up being a crapshoot, the iconic models attracting undue attention from unsavory parties, knockoffs being rampant. About the only good thing is one doesn't have to worry much about resale value. However, the resale exercise itself is a whole other story. Haihhhh..... Rsc's service brief is to restore a watch to its optimum working condition. Lume which no longer works and dials which are on the verge of flaking off are definitely not optimum in their books, so that's why they do what they do. But then again, today's market puts a premium on things like flat 4 bezels and aph dials, so it does beg to question, who is the irrational one here? 3rd paragraph - apart from ad games, it has probably been like this for the past 10-20+ years now, except that replicas now are probably much much better than the AAA grade from back then. I remember hearing stories as a kid of how that uncle got his arm slashed just so thieves can get to his gold Rolex This post has been edited by Chinoz: Sep 15 2020, 11:15 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2020, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2020, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2020, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(barcabodo @ Sep 19 2020, 02:19 PM) brother gave his omega seamaster midsize (quartz) to me, but the battery is dead for quite some time. yeay my first luxury watch I hope the old battery has been removed or it hasn't leaked. If so, should just be a simple battery replacement.can i replace the battery at any shop? i read Steven Watch Fixology is pretty good, so might go there, or if you guys have any recommendation (pj/shah alam area)? also do i need to service the watch first, or can simply replace the battery? i saw omega price for service, can't afford it though If you're planning on bringing it near water, might be a good idea to do a pressure test as well just to make sure the seals are still up for the task. I did my battery replacement with a 3rd party watchmaker who was familiar with Omegas, but that was outside of Msia. Is yours the one with or without the red Seamaster text? |
|
|
Sep 24 2020, 12:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2020, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2020, 12:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0297sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 11:32 AM |