QUOTE(Chinoz @ Jul 25 2017, 10:03 AM)
Firstly, there's a 2.5L turbo in the CX9, so I guess the possibility, however minute, is there for them to put it in the 3 or CX5.
Secondly, I'm a big NA fan, so I'm pleased to see Mazda continue to develop sans turbocharging (even though everyone and their mothers are shoving a turbo down their tiny <2L engines).
I do not agree with the sentiment that turbo power makes a car fun to drive - I've always appreciated the linear pull of a good NA engine.
The 2.5L petrol turbo may be too powerful to put in the CX-5 or Mazda 3. Even 2.0L turbo for Mazda 3 may be overkill. What Mazda needs is 2.0L turbo for CX-5 and 1.6L turbo for Mazda 3.
I would say the power of the Mazda 3 is enough for the average driver but a little more power will make it a really fun car to drive.
QUOTE(Chinoz @ Jul 25 2017, 10:03 AM)
So I recently got a Subaru with a CVT. This is my first time owning a CVT, but I've previously rented a Mitsu ASX with CVT and I wasn't impressed with it - it felt lethargic, it droned and very uninspired as a whole.
But with the Subaru - it's a 3.6L unit with bundles of torque - it felt smooth and effortless.
The revs were happy to stay low while the car still pulled.
It made the whole notion of changing gears feel antiquated - no more jerky gearshifts.
I guess what I'm trying to get at is - don't diss it until you've tried it

I suppose huge amount of torque can overcome a lazy CVT but the price of the Subaru 3.5L and high road tax means it is academic for most drivers.