fred...i agree that bmw not performing well in 2006 but this doesnt means that bmw wont perform bad in 2007 rite?

End result
McLaren 1-2 (Fernando or Lewis, both seems equally fast), Kimi 3rd (or 2nd, depend on his drive), both BMW Sauber 4th and 5th, and then Fisico

n sumore claw back 16 places wo although i was hoping 4 top 5

article 77d from FIA
Massa and Ferrari clearly breached that

omFG

Renault is f***ed up this season

source
Even though Ferrari and massa use 1 pit stop, but still meet FIA rules.  

^ I notice his hands wasnt on that steering wheel. Good thing, else his fingers could have been crush.

that's one accident he'll never forget

If i'm not mistaken, Michael was about to lap DC when DC lifted his accelerator (not sure which part of the circuit, but i think its a high speed section), it was a wet track, so lifting will cause the car to slow down very fast, Michael crash into DC.

Should be spa.. Micheal's favourite track, but never got a string of good results there. so if there's any place, should be that,, cos micheal is pretty GOSU in other tracks 

I miss spa, the track was GOOD =3

It is understood that Anthony Davidson, complaining of upper back pain after finishing the Australian Grand Prix, is still at The Alfred hospital in Melbourne following initial precautionary checks.

The Briton's Super Aguri Honda landed heavily after locking wheels with the Spyker Ferrari of fellow rookie Adrian Sutil early in the 58-lap Australian Grand Prix.

"The jolt also winded me a lot making talking on the radio difficult," he said in a post-race statement.  


It is believed that Davidson had x-rays and could stay in hospital overnight, after he was taken out of the circuit on a stretcher and apparently in considerable pain with back muscle spasms.

Davidson ended the opening race of the season in 16th position, some 72 seconds ahead of Sutil.

i'm talking about d second pit stop.

McLaren Mercedes boss Ron Dennis has accused BMW Sauber of 'showboating' in the Australian Grand Prix.

Hinwil based BMW Sauber's Nick Heidfeld had an impressive start to the Melbourne race, leaping ahead of Fernando Alonso, but the German made his first pit stop very early and was among only three competitors to start on the 'soft' tyre.

In the official post-race press release, Dennis described BMW's strategy as 'unexpected' and 'very disruptive' to McLaren's plans to win. 

Later, the British chief told reporters: "Our race was seriously compromised by the Heidfeld strategy, which we just didn't understand. It smacked of showboating in the opening part of the race

Stop taking things out of context. The way the interviews work; they are after all just answering the questions put to them. Besides i don't remember him reasoning anything about finishing 2nd but that's just maybe me.

But u wanna know one thing that baffles me...Kimi claimed he lost radio communication for the race...yet after he crossed the finish line....tada..we hear Mr Todt and his race engineer: Congratz Kimi...great job...bla bla
Odd don't u think  

(Tobias Holtkamp - Bild) Kimi, who was on the phone that Jean Todt gave you?
KR: I think it was Michael, but the line was pretty bad so I couldn't hear him.

More on Michael
(Georg Nolte - Bild) Kimi, how did you and Michael work together in the last month?
KR: I have seen him twice -- when they launched the car and I think at one test. He came, but I left at the same time almost. So, we haven't really been spending time

More on Kimi's radio prob
(Paolo Ianieri - La Gazzetta dello Sport) Kimi did you see the accident involving Wurz and Coulthard on the big screen?
KR: No. I saw just a little picture of it. I didn't have time to look too much. But luckily enough, with the problem with the radio that we had, if the safety car had come out... so, it was good that it didn't.

Actually the reporter asked whether this was the 1st time he was pushed hard by a teammate. Alonso replied that Fisichella and Trulli had pushed him hard before mentioning Fisi's win in Aussie...To me it just sounds like he's trying to be politically correct and not offend any of his previous teammates. Maybe u misintepreted what he was trying to say..

And u might be right...Kimi probably couldn't pick up the broadcast 

Ah i thought u meant another question...I was referring to the question asked by Livio Oricchio from O Estado de Sao Paulo...It's in the link u gave...seems like u didn't really read everything did u..
Besides even for that question u were referring to i didn't see anything wrong with what he answered...

A new row about the legality of formula one cars could be about to break out in the pit lane of 2007.

The website of American broadcaster Speed TV reports that the under-body of Ferrari's dominant F2007 machine came under quiet scrutiny by rivals and the FIA in Australia.

It is suggested that the car's floor might have been designed to give a performance advantage by moving, which - as in the 'flexing wings' sagas of last year - is illegal.

Predictably, the leading antagonist of the new saga appears to be McLaren, who reportedly suspect that Ferrari's floor lowers at speed to give Kimi Raikkonen and Felipe Massa an unfair speed boost in a straight line. 

"We will see how things are in two or three races," McLaren Team Principal Ron Dennis said, explaining that rival teams often seek clarification about rule interpretations early in the season.

He added: "So it takes a race or two to know what is or isn't permitted."

A Ferrari spokesman commented: "It's part of the game any time Ferrari is quickest. It's not the first time that there have been questions about legality.

"If someone has a complaint, there is always the FIA."

Nonsense. Schumacher likes to know what's happening all around him all the time. How many times does he ends up being WC?
And on the Ferrari car issue, teams have legit reason to complain can complain. Liek when Ferrari complained of McLaren's brake cooler in 98' or McLaren's 3rd braking system also in teh same year. Both are legal and yet was banned... interesting isn't it?