QUOTE(linkinstreet @ May 19 2007, 04:51 PM)
No, the cars
are definately MUCH more slower. And the V6 + the 10,000RPM limit will slow that to a point where even US CART and INDY series will be faster. C'mon man, use your brain. 19,000rpm vs 10,000 rpm. Which will give out more power on low end torque? And the 10,000 will be hitting the redline midway down the straight!
No way jose.
And about Max and Bernie, they really need to get out, fast. Get out before fans alienate this series.
Wait a minute there brother. First off, you're saying as though these engines are already made, implemented and tested in current F1 cars. Well, I'm not sure about that because I only see words, but nowhere in my post I was referring to the speculated 2011 rule. I was actually referring to CURRENT (2007) cars compared to year 2004 cars. To prove my point...in Melbourne GP...the current F1 record is made by Michael with the F2004 and he did a 1.24.215. I think its the record during the race...not sure. Kimi this year got pole, fastest during race, and win in Melbourne but only with a fastest lap of 1:25.235 (on lap 41 of 58). Button apparently did a 1.25.229 for qualifying in 2006. So, that proves my point that "current F1 cars are only about 1 second slower than 2004 cars".

Precisely 1 second...and 200 of a second difference

Sorry if my post confused you.
If you need more details on the 2011 "green engine" rule speculation...
QUOTE(Radical New Engine Rules Proposed For 2011)
If adopted, radical new engine regulations could be set to change the face of Formula 1 from 2011 according to a document outlining the FIA's proposals for the future of the sport which have been sent to all current F1 manufacturers, the latest issue of F1 Racing magazine (on sale from Tuesday) reveals.
As previously suggested by the FIA, the new rules, if adopted, would dramatically change the way the sport approaches engine technology and will rely heavily on renewable sources of energy to power F1.
The proposals outline potential regulations for 2011-2014 that have been designed with the FIA's president Max Mosley's stated long-term aims in mind - namely to reduce costs and make F1 more environmentally friendly and road relevant.
It was sent to the manufacturers by Mosley and former BMW CEO Burkhard Goschel, the chairman of the Formula One Manufacturers' Advisory Commission, and was drawn up by the governing body's technical consultants Tony Purnell and Peter Wright.
The proposals were sent to the manufacturers, and not the teams' management, directly as they mainly concern powertrain (engine) regulations.
And these proposals include a turbo-compounded 2.2-litre V6 engine formula, with the power units to run on bio-fuel rather than the current unleaded fuel.
The engines would produce around 770bhp (including a kinetic energy recovery system) with the maximum revs limited to 10,000rpm.
Engines would be required to last five grands prix, as opposed to the two currently, with the fuel savings thanks to the lower revs expected to be about 30 per cent.
Further mooted proposals include cars to be fitted with traction control, four-wheel drive and a 13-second-per-lap, driver controlled, power-boost function in a bid to aid overtaking.
The document also states that all development that cannot be classified as powertrain development - for example aerodynamics - should be "severely constrained".
In addition to all current F1 manufacturers, the document was sent to both Ford and Volkswagen-Audi, who may join the sport in the future.
Source This post has been edited by young_soul: May 19 2007, 06:02 PM