QUOTE(blackwhitechipsKL @ Jul 5 2016, 07:11 PM)
not sure about the logic though. there are definitely far more inexperience divers than experienced divers, and inexperienced divers are usually more careless/unaware of situations compared to experienced divers. Therefore, logic will dictate that the number of accidents attributed to inexperience divers will far outweigh the experienced divers.
also, how to define experienced divers in the first place? AOW diver with 8 dives under his/her belt or OW diver with 50 dives? secondly, news are likely from west because of stricter regulations/awareness of safety, so any accidents are rare and often reported? we don't hear much news from this region because of the many 'sweatshops' DC churning out goldfish or seahorse divers? accidents that happens is usually reported only in local news and not international/regional news because it happens to often? unless there are death, usually no reports in newspaper.
again, my humble opinion
I've observed that too. Number of incompetent divers getting certified and such. But the number of them who actually continue diving isn't that great i suppose.
I think death from diving is quite a big thing here. Dying from a recreational activity is something that shouldn't happen, provides awareness to public and hence is something worth reporting. But i do agree that near-misses are likely under-reported.
However, comparing relatively the number of deaths reported, shouldn't the number of accidents follow closely? I mean, you can't only excel in number of deaths without near-misses rite? It's a continuum from a simple mistake all the way to tragedy.
This is solely my personal opinion and i have no stats to back my observations up.