QUOTE(WhatMan @ Aug 27 2016, 08:52 AM)
The original price for Zenfone 3 Ultra stated earlier was RM2,599, but now I'm seeing shop in my area sell it for RM2,499.
only rm100 cheaper Asus ASUS Zenfone 3/3 Deluxe/3 Ultra ~ Discussion ~, The hype of 6GB RAM is here
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 06:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
48,441 posts Joined: Sep 2014 From: REality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 06:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
981 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 06:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,623 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 07:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,220 posts Joined: Dec 2015 |
ZF3 vs S7E camera fight:
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 07:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#345
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,829 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Very good comparison. Looks like Samsung won right
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 09:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#346
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,001 posts Joined: May 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 11:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
48,441 posts Joined: Sep 2014 From: REality |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2016, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
265 posts Joined: May 2010 |
I'm for tempted to get the zenfone 3 ultra, but at the same time worried about the performance of the snapdragon 652 in it..don't know will lag or not..but I loke the big screen and the design of the phone.
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 11:23 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
291 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 11:26 AM
|
|
Elite
27,801 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor |
QUOTE(^4ever_Fan+a5y^ @ Aug 29 2016, 11:50 PM) I'm for tempted to get the zenfone 3 ultra, but at the same time worried about the performance of the snapdragon 652 in it..don't know will lag or not..but I loke the big screen and the design of the phone. There is absolutely no lag . My other A9Pro, MiMax 128GB is also using same chipset and there is no lag tooThis post has been edited by benny888: Aug 30 2016, 11:28 AM |
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 11:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,623 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 11:41 AM
|
|
Elite
27,801 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor |
QUOTE(WhatMan @ Aug 30 2016, 11:30 AM) Camera is quite good and is much better than Mate8, MiMax but is not in the class of say Note7, S7e, LG V10. Even lowlight shots I rate it as above average. Snapping is close to immediateI deemed it good enough for my usage : for sharing on FB, whatsapp I would say most casual users will not be unhappy with its camera shots quality However i will rarely used its camera as this phablet is mainly for entertainment purposes. For my daily phablet it will be my MiMax and at times Note7 or A9 Pro |
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 11:42 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,455 posts Joined: Jan 2015 From: Qatar |
QUOTE(zulizo @ Aug 30 2016, 11:23 AM) well... after looking at some reviews of phones on SD625 (including this version of ZF3), it seems that many would agree the SOC is much better in battery use. especially if compared with the dreaded (in terms of battery life) Intel Atom.The C7 was reviewed by GSMArena. While it has 3.3Ah battery, the screen is 5.7 in 1080p - bigger than ZF3 ZE520KL's 5.2 in 1080p unit. CNET reviewd the ZE520KL and gave a 10 (out of 10!!!) score for its battery life. Hardwarezone reviewed the ZE552KL and remarked "Long battery life" in its summary/conclusion AndroidPolice reviewed the 552 and remarked battery life is great while in the comments section the reviewer made a statement of 6hrs SOT with 40% remaining IndianExpress (yes, I go to any website google throw at me) remarked that the 552KL has good battery life at the start of the review (I mean, rather than starting at whatever good aspects it may have, they chose to highlight the battery life first) and that it lasted a day and a half of usage. It would be interesting to find this SOC in better screen tech and higher battery capacity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 12:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
981 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
QUOTE(abu.shofwan @ Aug 30 2016, 11:42 AM) well... after looking at some reviews of phones on SD625 (including this version of ZF3), it seems that many would agree the SOC is much better in battery use. especially if compared with the dreaded (in terms of battery life) Intel Atom. maybe due to its 14nm architecture?The C7 was reviewed by GSMArena. While it has 3.3Ah battery, the screen is 5.7 in 1080p - bigger than ZF3 ZE520KL's 5.2 in 1080p unit. CNET reviewd the ZE520KL and gave a 10 (out of 10!!!) score for its battery life. Hardwarezone reviewed the ZE552KL and remarked "Long battery life" in its summary/conclusion AndroidPolice reviewed the 552 and remarked battery life is great while in the comments section the reviewer made a statement of 6hrs SOT with 40% remaining IndianExpress (yes, I go to any website google throw at me) remarked that the 552KL has good battery life at the start of the review (I mean, rather than starting at whatever good aspects it may have, they chose to highlight the battery life first) and that it lasted a day and a half of usage. It would be interesting to find this SOC in better screen tech and higher battery capacity. |
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 12:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
981 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 02:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,623 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(benny888 @ Aug 30 2016, 11:41 AM) Camera is quite good and is much better than Mate8, MiMax but is not in the class of say Note7, S7e, LG V10. Even lowlight shots I rate it as above average. Snapping is close to immediate Some sample photos would be nice.I deemed it good enough for my usage : for sharing on FB, whatsapp I would say most casual users will not be unhappy with its camera shots quality However i will rarely used its camera as this phablet is mainly for entertainment purposes. For my daily phablet it will be my MiMax and at times Note7 or A9 Pro |
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 02:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,455 posts Joined: Jan 2015 From: Qatar |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 08:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
17,220 posts Joined: Dec 2015 |
QUOTE(abu.shofwan @ Aug 30 2016, 11:42 AM) well... after looking at some reviews of phones on SD625 (including this version of ZF3), it seems that many would agree the SOC is much better in battery use. It would be interesting to find this SOC in better screen tech and higher battery capacity. QUOTE(Neomax3 @ Aug 30 2016, 12:44 PM) The best battery life phone in 2016 (and perhaps 2017.....) will be LeMoto Vibe P2 = Snap625 + 5000mAh + AMOLED.Thanks to the new (and expensive ...) 14nm fab... The Snap 625 is generally above average performance but super-duper-frugal battery usage... I'd nominate it the "Best SoC for Efficiency over Performance" Award. |
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 08:56 PM
|
|
Elite
27,801 posts Joined: Jun 2007 From: Johor |
Best battery life I had experienced to date s Samsung A9pro with SD652 chip n 5000mAh : SOT 13-14 hours vs 9-10 on ZF3ultra, 10-11 on Mate8 n 11-12 on MiMax
|
|
|
Aug 30 2016, 09:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,623 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0276sec
0.30
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:57 PM |