QUOTE(sleep_walkerz @ Mar 17 2007, 10:03 PM)
does this mean if we join tiz year batch, by the end of the 5.5 years, we would obtain a master instead of a degree./???
sorry for my poor understanding , but the major n minor thing kinda confused me . so , by now, does utm provide minor courses ? will the minor courses offered is as 'heavy' to study as the major....or sumthing more simple? ...gah ..im confused with the timeline , which is current n which is stuff will happen in 2010?
they're planning it, but i couldnt promise anything. and yes, the plan is so that after 5.5 years, u'll get ur masters instead of a degree.
currently, UTM does not provide minor courses. like i said before, that's the plan. until then, DO NOT assume anybody's promising u anything.

QUOTE
out of topic : erm, does utm offer any scholarship for diploma students? i heard theres is some that offer scholarship to those who aready been accepted in to IPTA . ( wat about JPA tat offer biasiswa dalam negeri?..wats the minimum requirement?izit as hard to get as biasiswa luar negara)
thanks in advance
as far as i know, UTM does not offer any scholarships for diploma students. the only scholarship that UTM (not JPA) gives out is for post-graduate studies (PG diploma/masters/phd). come to think of it, i'm not sure if JPA still giving out scholarships for diploma, but i know they do so for degree courses. u'll have to check with JPA for the requirements.
QUOTE(Cassie @ Mar 17 2007, 10:51 PM)
hi there.
i've checked some sources and obviously the architecture course in UPM is not accredited... plus it says the architect graduates from UPM are not consdered as architect and they have to work for a minimal 4 years to be licensed architect. so it that true?
UPM is not accredited, yes, but the proper term would be "not accredited YET". the school is currently working for their Part 1 accreditation, and if all goes well, they should be able to secure accreditation for Part 1 within 3 years.
current graduates from UPM are considered as unqualified architects, or by definition:
a person who have had full training as an architect but dont have the papers to prove it.it's just the same with someone who trained under an architect as an apprentice, learning the trade by example and tutorship of the mentor for... say... 10 years. such person has more or less equal capabilities with a fresh graduate architect, but they dont have the certificate (degree) to prove it.
and yes, they'd have to gain a substantial amount of experience before they can sit for the PAM Part 1 and 2 examinations.
QUOTE(Cassie @ Mar 17 2007, 11:11 PM)
so is that pointless even though i get a place in UPM? wat are they supposed t do even after graduation from UPM as architects?
as i've mentioned before, they have the capabilities, but not the certificate. an office may still employ them as architect's assistance or apprentice/junior architect with reduced responsibilities. until they achieve their Part 2, they will stay in a "reduced" state, unless the firm thinks otherwise.
most firms nowadays dont really mind about the papers as long as u can perform. but such person are rare. i mean, since LAM and PAM consists of practicing architects in msia, and they are the people who determines the quality of the schools, they'll know whether to employ the students or not.
Added on March 17, 2007, 11:45 pmQUOTE(Cassie @ Mar 17 2007, 11:38 PM)
well, it's not like i don't wanna try out for another universities, it's just that it's extremely risky for me to apply for other architecture courses with interview. i still think the whole interview thing is not right... (no offence though)
well, if u can share exactly why u feel it's not right to have an interview, then maybe i can explain in detail why we need one
This post has been edited by azarimy: Mar 17 2007, 11:45 PM