Wow so much talk now on overprovisioning etc.

I dropped Unifi when I moved houses and got Astro IPTV with 10Mbps.
From Unifi 5Mbps to 10 with 30 hours free boost up to 50Mbps - I was blown away.
Then I canceled astro and settled for 20Mbps from Time.
Within 2 months I now get 100Mbps (out of supposed 300 from my ZTE stock router on LAN).

Now I am paying the same I ever did - which was RM179. To get a consistent 5x speed boost  over what I paid for, with kids on youtube, wife on netflix and I can iflix at the same time...I dunno. I'm okay with it.

I'll upgrade my router later - but coming from Jaring, TMnet, streamyx, unifi and now TIME, i can tell you consistency wins every time.

you are right we are also not paying their full rate. be thankful.

There's all this talk about accepting and being thankful about what we get. This is the reason why we're firmly stuck in the second or even third world.

Near Gbit speeds across the country (typically over 900M anytime of day)

some sharing on WIFI AC... I tried the TPLINK T4u, found out that the speed can go > 220mbps/200mbps with no prob, just maybe DC...(driver issue)

For Asus PCE-68, it will connect at 280mbps/300 and it will drop to 100mbps.... ( still driver issue!)

So, better use LAN cable...

Agree, we have to be realistic. Afterall, we're not paying enterprise-price for some 99.99% uptime SLA/SLG.

My own expectation for Time's fibre is 90-95% of the advertised speed. And after seeing quite a few people in Lowyat forum claiming to reach speeds of 100+, 300+ and 500+, makes me even more convinced I should not settle down for 70% average.

IMO, between AC1750 and AC1900, AC1900 is pointless. Both support AC1300, difference is that AC1750 supports N 450, while AC1900 supports N 600. Common devices rarely are N600 capable and in real life, N450 and N600 has no obvious difference. Besides, in the future you would be using AC band instead of N.

I think you should change it.

it depends on ur surrounded adapter, extension also got effect, house electric wire also got effect.

Grrr. It means the same thing. Astro should do it for their customers.  This is unacceptable. And Time should understand that it is vital to maintain across the board services.

Thanks to you and all the rest.
It is more towards why test using Win 10 and Win XP has huge diff on the dl side and yet the upload side is near the same.
Thus, back to original question , is OS play a role here ? Some replied that age of hardware and LAN cable (lenght, aged) etc does play a role...

But why it only affect the download side, this is the main question....well, need to ask her IT guy to study the config again, or anything that limit the dl speed for that particular PC or firewall of that PC limited the dl speed, etc....

Nope. Win XP is old PC ; Win 10 is new notebook.
But still back to question, why on Win XP the upload is near max (45-47Mbps), but download is only 8-9 Mbs ?

The speed is mostly accurate on LAN. 480 - 500Mbps.

You may upgrade to AC5300 or AC 3200 if you need more accurate on Wi-Fi.

However, speed not accurate on Wi-Fi ( One of the main problem )

Great, too sad for me, all devices unable to support AC.

All until Wireless N only.

For any kind soul on time..would it be possible to try speedtest to this site..

Netflix speedtest

This is netflix speedtest and it's only download speedtest. Curious what speeds time owners get on a 100Mbps line.

On unifi 100Mbps I get average about 55-70Mbps

Wow.

How much do u get if u using Lan for speedtest?

woah    the prices for both of these.....

those are like commercial/industrial quality right =O they are priced within the RM800 - RM1,000.00 region =O