One of your RAM got faulty?Hehe,if dun run on dual channel also cannot boot up?

You got try to clear the CMOS and put back 2 sticks of RAM? Might be CMOS corrupted.

you can either take out the battery for a while or use the jumper to reset it.

Note : Lowest support is 865 PERL board :)This program only allows you to overclock 3% which you don't feel any difference on it after o/c.

The program is useless in Intel 865PERL. Last time i owned one,no matter after or before o/c,the performance is still almost the same.

Can't believe it.I thought those Dell dekstops cannot be o/c at all. Right now i am using a Dell desktop in my office,2.6Ghz HT system.Don't know got chance to o/c or not...

Nelza is not yet back? Nelza,I have changed my TI4200 to Gecube 9550 Extreme.One more thing need to edit also,i am currently using Abit IC7-G not AI7.Thank,please help me to update in the first page.

I think you can use the Sandra software to test it. This Everest is just telling the max. speed that your RAM can read,write and copy.

Bench with Sandra it can tell you how much is your RAM and memory controller's efficiency.

My new Super PI 1M result.




Attached thumbnail(s)

My RAM sometimes is limiting me,else i might go for higher frequency.

I cannot use the new lite version,install already and run the program nothing come out. Weired. I use back the 2005 lite version.

I read an article showing that the memory controller will be throttle at certain frequency after overclock.I think i found back the page,you can try to refer here.

Intel Strap
I can't read the page already as i didn't register in this forum.You can try to read it up here.

I got 75 - 76% in the Sandra testing using 1:1.. Tthis % is going to give huge effects on the whole system.I think the higher the memory bandwidth the better it does.

Thanks as need you to update the info. Well i am also thinking that the 1:1 will be giving the best performance in memory.I am doubt with the 5:4 divider.

Not to say like that but the divider is always the best that you can run on 1:1.This will make the proc and memory speed be synchronize.

I got one question that is blur about that.How to differentiate between the P4 "C" proc and a normal P4 HT proc? Since both of them also got the HT function on the processor there,it's hard to define them. I thought that all the procs that came with HT are P4 C not including the P4 "B" 3.06GHz with HT.

That's under Northwood core.You can see from attachment below.


Attached thumbnail(s)

Why they don't make those P4 800FSB HT under "C" ?Just little bit confuse with it.But i know that those P4 800FSB HT are called "C" type proc. The table might be confused up other poeple as some of them are not declared with "C" in the table.

You are worng.P4 A type got 2 versions. Earlier version is just having 512kb L2 (Northwood)with the later one is based on prescott which is having 1MB L2.

The table i have atteched is confusing me. Then conclusion is all the 800FSB proc with HT are categorized in " C " .

@ shinjite, the normal P4 HT proc i meant was pointing at the attachment that i posted,why is not P4 "C" ?

Regarding divider,i don't have experience on using the CH or BH chips but i know that those RAMs are good in overclocking. Bandwidth efficiently i think should be more or less the same with the Hynix chip right?