QUOTE(lukenn @ Apr 23 2016, 02:27 AM)
Actually, that's not quite accurate. Its just a misconception that noob UTCs perpetuate to get their clients to buy new funds, switch etc.
Apart from market forces, the unit price drops (significantly) when
1. the manager decides to split the units, eg : 100 units @ NAV1.00 => 200 units @ NAV0.50
2. the manager declares distibutions eg : 100 units @ NAV1.00 declares 0.01 distribution/unit => 100 units @ NAV0.99 + RM1.00 distribution
With that being said, NAV is purely a reflection of how much it cost to buy a unit in the fund right yesterday. I would strongly suggest tracking performance using MYR values instead.
Hi,Apart from market forces, the unit price drops (significantly) when
1. the manager decides to split the units, eg : 100 units @ NAV1.00 => 200 units @ NAV0.50
2. the manager declares distibutions eg : 100 units @ NAV1.00 declares 0.01 distribution/unit => 100 units @ NAV0.99 + RM1.00 distribution
With that being said, NAV is purely a reflection of how much it cost to buy a unit in the fund right yesterday. I would strongly suggest tracking performance using MYR values instead.
Just need to figure out as below:-
a) How reliable is the Bid-to-Bid Annualized Return analysis? If shows uptrend, much of the time they gain profit?
b) What they mean as below?
"The performance figures in the table above are calculated using bid-to-bid prices, with any income or dividends reinvested. Performance figures of over 1 year are annualised.(Eg. A 33.1% gain in 3 years works out to a 10% gain per year when annualised.)"
Apr 23 2016, 07:53 AM

Quote
0.0241sec
0.11
6 queries
GZIP Disabled