Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
121 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V20

views
     
waja2000
post Mar 3 2016, 09:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Cambridge Pixel Supplies Radar Simulator Software to OSI Maritime for Malaysian Navy Contract

CAMBRIDGE, England, March 2, 2016 /PRNewswire/ --

Cambridge Pixel to demonstrate radar capability on booth 35 at Maritime Security East, Norfolk, Virginia, USA on 21-23 March 2016
Cambridge Pixel (http://www.cambridgepixel.com), an award-winning developer of radar display, tracking and simulation subsystems, has supplied radar simulator software to OSI Maritime Systems (OSI), a world-leading provider of integrated navigation and tactical solutions for the naval market.

OSI is supplying an Integrated Bridge System to the Royal Malaysian Navy for use in the soon-to-be commissioned Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). The fully-functioning radar simulator supports OSI's need to perform integration activities in advance of installation and commissioning on the vessel, and includes comprehensive software emulation of the radar control interface.

The emulator is based upon Cambridge Pixel's established SPx Radar Simulator product. The simulator includes powerful multi-channel radar video generation with full modelling for realistic terrain and clutter returns. Multiple targets may be defined, each either located in a fixed position (such as a buoy or lighthouse) or moving along motion profiles defined as part of the simulator's scenario or under remote control from an external source.

Commenting for OSI, Ken Kirkpatrick, president & CEO, said, "We selected Cambridge Pixel because of their existing highly flexible and powerful radar simulation capability and their experience with the Kelvin Hughes SharpEye radar. The company's engineers were able to respond quickly to the requirement to extend this capability to include full radar control and status emulation, providing us in a timely manner with an invaluable tool to support our own software development and significantly accelerate and de-risk our integration activities."

David Johnson, CEO of Cambridge Pixel, said, "We were delighted to work alongside OSI to support their activities on this significant programme. The modular approach which we bring to all our software products meant that enhancing our existing simulation capability to meet the customer's detailed requirements was a low-risk development and could be delivered on time and fully compliant.

"Our radar simulation software and hardware products have supported many customers needing a realistic radar source that can be used to fully exercise tracking and display functionality," added Mr Johnson. "We have been able to build on this capability to meet OSI's needs."

To enhance the realism of the generated video, the simulator can also take real-world recordings obtained from a radar installation and superimpose synthetic targets, each with specific characteristics such as dimensions and radar cross-section. Furthermore, movement of the simulated radar itself can be controlled either by an external navigation feed to the simulator or via a predefined motion profile. The simulator's local display includes a provision for tiled maps and world vector shoreline displays as an underlay to the primary radar video.

To provide a full emulation capability for OSI, Cambridge Pixel augmented the existing radar simulator by emulating the control and status interface of the Kelvin Hughes SharpEye radar used on the Littoral Combat Ship. The resulting emulator can be used to fully exercise the radar control, tracking and display functions of OSI's application software.

Radar video using the ASTERIX network digital format is generated along with synthesised Automatic Identification System (AIS) reports which would normally be sent by a vessel's transponder. The emulated radar control interface allows the integrator to set radar mode and turning rate, define multiple blind sectors and mimic real radar alarm and fault conditions.

Cambridge Pixel's technology is used in naval, air traffic control, vessel traffic, commercial shipping, security, surveillance and airborne radar applications.

For more information about Cambridge Pixel's software or other products, please visit http://www.cambridgepixel.com or call: +44 (0) 1763 852749 or email: enquiries@cambridgepixel.com.

Cambridge Pixel will be demonstrating its radar display, tracking and simulation solutions on booth 35 at Maritime Security East (http://www.maritimesecurityeast.com/), Norfolk, Virginia, USA from 21-23 March 2016.

Media photo - showing OSI's integrated bridge system:

http://cambridgepixel.com/images/News/pr-osi.jpg

About OSI (http://www.osimaritime.com)

OSI Maritime Systems has been providing advanced integrated navigation and tactical solutions to military customers for over 20 years. As a pioneer of Warship Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (WECDIS), the company has grown to be a leading provider of integrated navigation and tactical solutions designed for naval and maritime security operations. The company develops and delivers integrated bridge systems for warships, integrated dived navigation systems for submarines, and C2 systems for small craft. OSI currently has 20 naval customers from around the world with over 500 warships and submarines operating with its world leading integrated navigation and tactical solutions.

About Cambridge Pixel (http://www.cambridgepixel.com)

Founded in 2007, Cambridge Pixel is an award winning developer of sensor processing and display solutions including primary and secondary radar interfacing, processing and display components for military and commercial radar applications. It is a world-leading supplier of software-based radar tracking and scan conversion solutions through its modular SPx software, and HPx hardware product range. Based near Cambridge in the UK, the company operates worldwide through a network of agents and distributors. In 2015, Cambridge Pixel received a Queen's Award for Enterprise in International Trade for 'outstanding overseas sales growth over the last three years'.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ca...-570807901.html

This post has been edited by waja2000: Mar 3 2016, 09:47 AM
Mr_47
post Mar 3 2016, 09:56 AM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 2 2016, 12:40 PM)
Western pilots who never had the plane capable in executing the maneuver would obviously marvel at the move. Russian pilots meanwhile would probably do a cobra maneuver every day before breakfast. laugh.gif
*
hahaha lol western all goes virtual, only simulator for breakfast. lunch dinner and so on tapau by russian anytime. toilet break also can cobra. anytime anywhere cobra
Fat & Fluffy
post Mar 3 2016, 10:38 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ Mar 3 2016, 11:56 AM)
hahaha lol western all goes virtual, only simulator for breakfast. lunch dinner and so on tapau by russian anytime. toilet break also can cobra. anytime anywhere cobra
*
would cobra be effective in battle? how often is cobra being used?

western is superior in every way... its not about 1 on 1.. it is about fighting as a whole
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 3 2016, 10:57 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

EXCLUSIVE: First Western journalist to visit ISIS says US wants to ‘divide’ Syria

user posted image

QUOTE
“There is a move now from the rebels to separate their brigades from those of the terrorists, and this gives an opportunity to attack Al Nusra and other Al Qaeda groups, without attacking the rebels,”
QUOTE
“If the rebels would start to fight with the official government army, against ISIS, then we would have a chance to defeat ISIS, and to have peace in Syria. It is a dream, but a realistic dream,” said the journalist
QUOTE
The US divided Iraq, they divided Libya, and now they could divide Syria into four or five parts. Divided countries are weak countries, and I have an impression that certain American politicians like weak countries in the Middle East.”
QUOTE
Having witnesses IS operations during a 10-day assignment in Raqqa, the group’s unofficial capital in northern Syria, Todenhofer believes that it is sufficiently well-organized to exist indefinitely if it is not placed under pressure. He also says new attacks in Europe, like those carried out in Paris last year, are imminent, but little can be done to prevent them.


https://www.rt.com/news/334343-todenhofer-us-divides-syria/
azriel
post Mar 3 2016, 11:10 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
South Korean - Indonesian KF-X / IF-X Fighter Infographic.

user posted image

http://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20160...rsel-indonesia/

This post has been edited by azriel: Mar 3 2016, 11:19 AM
Frozen_Sun
post Mar 3 2016, 11:14 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Sep 2013
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 3 2016, 10:38 AM)
would cobra be effective in battle? how often is cobra being used?

western is superior in every way... its not about 1 on 1.. it is about fighting as a whole
*
F-22 and Saab Draken can also do Cobra

Cobra isn't an all-powerful maneuver, performed at the wrong time and wrong situation, it can backfire. The plane that does Cobra will nearly be stationary on air, a good target for cannon or IR missile, if the enemy has a wingman.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 3 2016, 11:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 3 2016, 10:38 AM)
would cobra be effective in battle? how often is cobra being used?
*
While for now the maneuver is only done to look good in an airshow, there is definitively a lot of usefulness for a fighter plane that is able to pull of the maneuver in a dogfight.

A total BVR style of aerial fighting is not 100% foolproof, the longer the range of a missile, the longer the target has time to counter it. There are many instances where missile-armed fighters have lost out to less advanced, more maneuverable fighters. If the fighting devolves into a close-range aerial melee, the fighter with better maneuverability will have the advantage.


Fat & Fluffy
post Mar 3 2016, 03:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong



QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 3 2016, 01:26 PM)
While for now the maneuver is only done to look good in an airshow, there is definitively a lot of usefulness for a fighter plane that is able to pull of the maneuver in a dogfight.

A total BVR style of aerial fighting is not 100% foolproof, the longer the range of a missile, the longer the target has time to counter it. There are many instances where missile-armed fighters have lost out to less advanced, more maneuverable fighters. If the fighting devolves into a close-range aerial melee, the fighter with better maneuverability will have the advantage.
*
in recent battles, i dont think a high % involves dogfights... am i right to say so? the aim of getting air superiority is to win and remove all air treats using whatever ways necessary... i doubt they would allow battles to even reach the stage of a dogfight... *from perspective of majors powers

close range? probably interceptors... 70s n 80s... now? i think its less significant
MichaelJohn
post Mar 3 2016, 03:20 PM

Pan Paka Pan <3
*******
Senior Member
2,514 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: [Confidential]


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 2 2016, 07:10 PM)
user posted image

New type of Russian rocket launcher, to be part of the Ratnik system. Looks very AT-4. laugh.gif
*
Disposable ones i guess?



QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 2 2016, 07:35 PM)
Russia's Sukhoi Developing Sixth-Generation Fighter

user posted image
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/20160302/1...l#ixzz41kD8wCEj

Aim Higher: Russia Working on Development of Seventh-Generation Fighter Jet

user posted image
http://sputniknews.com/military/20160302/1...on-fighter.html
*
No 5+/++? laugh.gif


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 3 2016, 12:17 AM)
user posted image

rclxms.gif
*
bout damn time wink.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 3 2016, 04:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Mar 3 2016, 03:20 PM)
Disposable ones i guess?
*
Sure looks like it, with that fibreglass-looking launcher.

Anyway I was hoping the Ratnik system would have some kind of light reloadable rocket launcher like the RPG-7 or a recoilless launcher tough. For organic infantry support, light anti-armor, those sort of roles. I find disposable rocket launchers rather cumbersome. Each infantryman can only bring one each and they are individually quite bulky.

Whereas reloadable launchers with one gunner and two assistants can carry a good amount of ammunition (an RPG-7 gunner carries the launcher tube, while each rifle-armed assistant carries 3-4 rockets each). That's a significant amount of firepower.

BorneoAlliance
post Mar 3 2016, 05:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

The U.S. Army’s Warplane Recognition Guide Is Hilariously Wrong

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

QUOTE
The U.S. Army publishes an official “Visual Aircraft Recognition” manual whose purpose, according to the manual itself, is to “assist the user in the technique of identifying friendly, hostile or foreign-country aircraft.”
QUOTE
So … there’s a problem. In February 2016, the Army published its first updates to the manual since 2006. And this update adds some gross, even hilarious errors. Louis Gundlach, a retired fighter pilot, first pointed out the errors and aviation aggregator Alert 5 drew attention to Gundlach’s pointers.


http://warisboring.com/articles/the-u-s-ar...ariously-wrong/
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 3 2016, 05:51 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

The Secret Service's 2010 Guide for Spotting Concealed Weapons

user posted image

QUOTE
The majority of Americans, about 88 percent, are right handed, so it might be a good idea to keep an eye on the right side of a suspect first—and check their waist band.

The majority of those righthanded people that carry handguns illegally carry them in the right front waist band, loose. 

WHY?

• They see it in the movies.
• It's the "cool" thing to do.
• That is where it is the most secure and accessible


http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a...cealed-weapons/
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 3 2016, 05:58 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

U.S. military invites experts to 'Hack the Pentagon'

user posted image

QUOTE
One senior defense official said thousands of qualified participants were expected to join the initiative.

Details and rules were still being worked out but the competition could involve monetary awards, the Pentagon said.

The Pentagon has long tested its own networks using internal so-called 'red teams,' but this initiative would open at least some of the department's vast network of computer systems to cyber challenges from across industry and academia.

Participants must be U.S. citizens and will have to register and submit to a background check before being turned loose on a predetermined public-facing computer system, the Pentagon said.

It said other more sensitive networks or key weapons programs would not be included, at least initially.

'The goal is not to comprise any aspect of our critical systems, but to still challenge our cybersecurity in a new and innovative way,' said the official.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/art...k-Pentagon.html
KYPMbangi
post Mar 3 2016, 05:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


A Russian Air Force drone reportedly crashed in Hama, Syria

user posted image

QUOTE
Syrian Daesh published a picture of an alleged "Russian UAV" that crashed in the eastern Hama countryside. However there is no confirmation from the Russian Ministry of Defence.

Like most unmanned drone incidents, the main cause of the the crash was most likely due to technical malfunction.

Observers believe that the developments in Syria, the use of surveillance aircraft and advanced military equipment has played a crucial role in the country.


[sos]
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 3 2016, 06:15 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

Crimea’s prosecutor provides evidence of Crimean Tatar Mejlis’ extremist activity

user posted image

QUOTE
The Mejlis leaders are accused of staging mass riots on February 26, 2014 near the Crimean parliament. Also, the Mejlis is suspected of organizing the blasts of electricity transmission towers in the Kherson Region in east Ukraine that led to a complete blackout of the Black Sea peninsula overnight to November 22, 2015.


http://tass.ru/en/politics/860362
KYPMbangi
post Mar 3 2016, 07:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Two SANDF pilots hospitalised after crash landing

user posted image

QUOTE
JOHANNESBURG - A South African Air Force Caravan aircraft crash landed on a private farm early this morning at the Langebaanweg Air Force Base, Western Cape.

South African National Defence Force (SANDF) said in a statement that the aircraft was conducting a routine night flight exercise.

The pilots were recovered by the Base Rescue Capability with both having sustained varying degrees of injuries and they are currently hospitalised.

It was further stated that Internal SANDF processes have been initiated to convene a Board of Inquiry to determine the cause of the accident.


[sos]
Fat & Fluffy
post Mar 3 2016, 07:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Jan 2016
From: Hong Kong




olman
post Mar 3 2016, 07:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,998 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 3 2016, 10:38 AM)
would cobra be effective in battle? how often is cobra being used?

western is superior in every way... its not about 1 on 1.. it is about fighting as a whole
*
Dog fight yes

BVR nope
xtemujin
post Mar 4 2016, 07:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
318 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Singapura, Singapore


Airbus Helicopters Introduces 'HForce' Weapons Package
by Thierry Dubois
- March 2, 2016, 1:46 PM

http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/def...weapons-package
BorneoAlliance
post Mar 4 2016, 07:44 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2014

This chart shows the incredible cost of operating the Air Force’s most expensive planes


QUOTE
The US Air Force’s unquestioned aerial dominance does not come cheap.

For the Air Force’s 10 most expensive planes, operating costs per hour start at $58,059, and it only climbs from there.

The following graphic, based upon the Air Force’s cost per hour of flight estimations, lists the 10 most expensive planes to operate in descending order:


user posted image

QUOTE
Designed as a doomsday plane, the Nightwatch is so expensive to operate due to both its size and its technical abilities. The plane is specially designed to survive electromagnetic pulses, with additional thermal and nuclear shielding. It also can refuel aerially and can fit up to 112 passengers.

Surprisingly, the much maligned F-35 is actually only the seventh most expensive plane per hour that the Air Force flies. The F-35′s costs are partially due to the lack of an efficient supply-chain for the aircraft, something that should be sorted out over the coming years.

Among the cheapest aircraft that the Air Force operates are Predator Drones and the A-10. These aircraft cost an estimated $1,500 and $11,500 per hour to operate, respectively.


http://www.businessinsider.my/air-force-pl...V1PASggiSve7.97

121 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0310sec    0.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:44 PM