Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

18 Pages « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AV Receivers/ Speakers/ Subwoofers, Discussion & Opinion

views
     
SSJBen
post Oct 10 2020, 06:33 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(voscar @ Oct 10 2020, 05:55 PM)
Hi, any difference for speaker wire used in car audio vs home audio? Also is it better to use ofc type to reduce corrosion?
*
Yes at minimum, get OFC copper. Do not fall for the silver plated copper bs though.

Copper is copper. Its function is to transport current and signal from point A to point B, it doesn't know or care if it's a car or a dedicated loudspeaker. Just keep to the rule of using the proper gauge for the length you want to run, it's that simple.
SSJBen
post Oct 11 2020, 12:54 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(touristking @ Oct 10 2020, 06:42 PM)
Right. Some can cost 10K and can look like a python snake. And some swear by it and some think it's snake oil.
*
In my experience, people who swear by it do not like to discuss about the cables they bought. Ask them a question about it, all they say is "it depends on your system, it depends on your ears, it depends on your setup, it depends, it depends, it depends if the sun doesn't come up tomorrow".

rolleyes.gif

If people want to buy cables because they look nice, go right ahead. It's like jewelry. A diamond is still after all, just carbon lol. But don't go around preaching those cables as if they do something different to the sound.
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2020, 02:58 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 12 2020, 10:39 AM)
Yesterday I also bought the Elac 5.2 speaker combo for 5.1 setup pair with Elac 3010 sub. One of the dealer have a weekend promotion price. Burn a big hole in my wallet in the past 2 days, AVR  (6k)+ speaker (8k) package cost 14k
*
Debut 5.2? So 4 bookshelves + 1 center?
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2020, 05:55 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 12 2020, 05:46 PM)
yes sir, 4 debut 5.2 + center.  sweat.gif  I made a mistake, I miscalculated gotten a 30" speaker stand . then I aware that the tweeter should at ear level so now the front tweeter is like 2" higher. Would angling the front tilting down slightly solve the issue?

I read that rear surround speaker is ok to be slightly higher , not sure if I should change the stand to a shorter one.
*
Ear level for the front speakers are only when you're doing critical listening. In movies when you're trying to ENJOY the movie, it doesn't matter. In fact, having the tweeter a couple inches higher is actually beneficial too as it increases the perceived soundstage height. 2" is fine, don't worry about it.

Surrounds should always be higher than ear level. But if you're doing Atmos/DTSX, it shouldn't be too high as the bed level speakers need to have some distance between it and the height level speakers.
SSJBen
post Oct 12 2020, 06:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 12 2020, 06:06 PM)
Thanks for your advice. If i understand you correctly , for atmos setup, the surround speaker should be at the same high as the front and should not be higher.
*
No, for Atmos the surrounds can still be higher than the fronts. It just cannot be so high until there's not enough of a gap between it and the heights.

Most ceilings in our Malaysian homes are between 9-12ft (generally speaking). So if your on wall height speakers are mounted at the 11ft point, then there should at least be about 5ft of space between that and the bed level surround speakers.

Personally I have my surround channels about 1ft higher than ear level and there is still more than 5ft of space between them and the height channels, I find that the best sweet spot.
SSJBen
post Oct 14 2020, 03:19 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Zot @ Oct 14 2020, 08:22 AM)
Easier is to have floor speaker with speaker facing an angle to ceiling, right?  smile.gif
*
No. Why would you ever want tweeters that are angled upwards to the ceiling?
SSJBen
post Oct 14 2020, 04:24 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Zot @ Oct 14 2020, 03:56 PM)
I was talking about speaker that purposely designed for 7.1 (housed together with front speaker) which has speaker on top angled toward ceiling at angle to reflect back to audience. A surround speakers, not the front speakers  smile.gif
*
Upfring Atmos modules are stupid, period.

They can work in only a very specific condition:

- Your ceiling is FLAT and is REFLECTIVE (problem 1)
- Your ceiling must be no higher than 12ft, optimally it should be 8-10ft.
- You must sit in ONE location only, that means if you have guests, well too fucking bad for them.

@problem 1
You generally want your room to be controlled acoustically, that means having acoustic absorption. The L/R fronts and center speakers are a million times more important than the heights, so just because upfiring speakers requires the ceiling to be untreated and reflective, you'd then have to compromise on the most important speakers in the system? Do you see how stupid that sounds?
SSJBen
post Oct 15 2020, 02:31 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Zot @ Oct 15 2020, 08:04 AM)
It serve certain condition and simple solution to certain people, not all.

Don't you think the 7.1 is excessive in most house hall in Malaysia? Nowadays, electronics can emulate the spaciousness of the area. Even with 5.1 I think it is already adequate, but of course industry need to invent something news  biggrin.gif
*
My opinion is that it doesn't serve a purpose at all. Why do Atmos when you're going to half ass it? Just don't do it instead. Spending the money, time and effort in getting the LCR channels right is a lot more important. If one cannot do Atmos and still wants surround, like you said - 5.1 is adequate, in fact more than adequate.

7.1 is indeed excessive for most living rooms in Malaysia. Considering that most homes are now also condos, 5.1 setups are also compromised because the typical positioning of a couch is usually flushed up against a wall.

Main take away is that people need to understand that spending RM5k on a pair of speakers just for the L and R gives them much better sound quality than squeezing RM5k into some half-assed Atmos setup. I've personally been through this and I can objectively show the differences in graphs and room measurements to prove it.

SSJBen
post Oct 15 2020, 03:33 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Zot @ Oct 15 2020, 03:21 PM)
I agree on speaker. For example 2k speakers will sound significantly better than 1k speakers; but with a 2k amplifier you can hardly hear the difference than a 1k amplifier since most amplifier price is on power and additional features nowadays.  smile.gif
*
Hence that's why I think upfring Atmos modules are stupid. There are a lot of content now with Atmos tracks, but they still aren't done very well. Not a whole lot of movies has rivaled the dedicated Atmos demos that Dolby specifically made few years ago. I wasted a lot of time in getting Atmos right and to be frank, I don't think it was even worth all that effort at this point.


QUOTE(touristking @ Oct 15 2020, 03:25 PM)
I do believe you are right, having been with people who are into high end HiFi and have also heard some costing 500K. To get good sound, and I am sure that includes Atmos, one will need to have a dedicated room.
*
A dedicated room is indeed preferred, because you can control the variables. The right amount of absorption, the right amount of diffusion, the seating configuration, the sub placement (which is vitally important), all that requires a dedicated room. I built one myself just to have these kind of luxuries.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Oct 15 2020, 03:33 PM
SSJBen
post Oct 15 2020, 04:23 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 15 2020, 04:18 PM)
in your opinion do you think in ceiling or the downward firing speaker would be the proper solution for atmos?
*
In-ceilings are the best solution for proper Atmos.

On-walls work as well, if you don't want to cut holes in your ceiling.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Oct 15 2020, 04:25 PM
SSJBen
post Oct 15 2020, 05:09 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(touristking @ Oct 15 2020, 04:38 PM)
so who get the sweet spot seat? Can get pretty lonely in an empty room.
*
Wait, why would you have to be alone? You can have multiple seats in a dedicated room and optimize sound for all the seats.


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 15 2020, 04:57 PM)
Thanks, I guess its hard to have a perfect setup. Upfiring speaker may be appealing for those who have the right room condition and dont want to drill holes into their ceiling / wall. I believe nothing is perfect
*
Cutting holes in the ceiling, perhaps not for everyone.

But drilling holes in the wall to mount speakers? Come on... if you can drill holes to mount portraits, you can drill holes for speakers. Same concept.
SSJBen
post Oct 16 2020, 03:38 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Oct 16 2020, 11:39 AM)
IMO, no. The sound quality of in-ceiling speaker is very poor due to the lack of the speaker cabinet.
If possible, get a proper speaker with bracket and struts that run across the ceiling.
But not everyone can do that. Depends on how much you can compromise.
I have gone from the era of 5.0 mini compo to Atmos with acoustic transparent screen, dealing with many compromise in the past. As you learned more, you realized there are things that just cannot be cheap-out due to science/physics.
*
@bolded
This is true. That's why those who are actually building their room from scratch will also build cabinets for the in-ceiling drivers. It's almost like a bookshelf except the driver will be using the ceiling as its baffle.


QUOTE(touristking @ Oct 16 2020, 03:29 PM)
Generally speaking, with sound, there is a spot that have the best. I am assuming from a Hifi standpoint.
*
Yes, that's music in 2.0. But we're talking about HT for movies here. In my room, as far as multi-channel content is concerned, all my seats are sweet spots. There are no "mother in law" seats in my room.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Oct 16 2020, 03:40 PM
SSJBen
post Oct 16 2020, 05:01 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 16 2020, 04:32 PM)
if we follow what Dolby guideline says we need to point the speakers in a certain angle, my understanding is that by doing that the sweetspot is limited. How did you setup your system to have multiple sweet spot? Do you adjust the angles outside of what Dolby suggested to set a sweet spot for a larger area instead of a focus area?
*
Dolby's guidelines are not perfect. Their guidelines are based on a very specific room size and shape, which nobody at home has. So you can't just follow their placement guide and expect it to work.
What you can do however is use the formula of placement and toe-in angles in relation to your room.

An example is the front L/R calls for 60 degrees to the center point of your sit, but in Dolby's guide - they place the seat 1/4 length from the back of the room. But what if your seat isn't 1/4 length but instead 1/2 length (I hope not because this is usually where the biggest room null is for a rectangle shaped room)? Now you can't put the speakers at the same distance from the front wall and get 60 degrees anymore. So you compensate for that by changing the placement of the speakers. It's really all simple maths and geometry.

When I say multiple sweet spots, it means that each and every of my seats has an even bass response. I have 4 seats in my room and no single seat has more or less bass than the other. Because in a multi channel setup, it's common to use a dedicated center channel. So to avoid lobing issues, all you gotta do is either use a vertical center that is identical to the L/R channels or get a horizontal Woofer-Tweeter+Mid-Woofer configuration center, which is what I'm using (SVS Ultra center). Dialogue and pretty much anything that appears on screen is locked to the middle no matter where the seating position is then.
SSJBen
post Oct 16 2020, 05:54 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 16 2020, 05:21 PM)
Thanks for your input, it make sense. In my living hall setup, it is a bit hard for me to spread the surround back wider than then front due to the design of the wall , I can put a 22 degrees angle or stretch up to max 30 degrees but my surround needs to fix in narrower position approximate 10 inch left + 10 inch right narrower. I afraid that this would cause the sound field to be imbalance at the surround. But I read that the AVR's audyssey xt32 calibration will determine the delay to compensate not sure how good it is, I read many good comments about audyssey xt32. Not sure will this solve the problem, I will need to test it out tomorrow, else I need to rearrange my furniture a bit , but it does not look good aesthetically
*
Yes there will be a compromise in surround panning that you have to live with if your side (I believe you're doing 5.1.4 right?) surrounds isn't wider than your fronts and isn't angled properly. You may notice a "hole" in the soundstage when objects off screen pans from the middle to the left then to your surround left. It would sound as if the object has disappeared momentarily then re-appear again to your side.

Delays can help to a certain extent, but I'm not sure if Audyssey would do that for you. Your adjustment would probably need to be manually tuned. This is because Audyssey calculates delays based on time from a channel to where the mic is placed, in relation to the reflections in the room. It does not compensate for your speaker placement for object based audio.
SSJBen
post Oct 18 2020, 04:26 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


user posted image

chriscym
Please don't use a tape measure. That's almost the dumbest way (besides eyeballing it) you can use to get speaker distance right. Only religious cable believers would do that. Distance is not actually distance in the AVR, it's actually called time delay a very long time ago.

The distance corresponds to how long it takes for sound to reach the MLP, in accordance to reflections, decay and ringing within the time domain of the room. An example, if the left surround speaker is 6ft away from your ears with a tape measure, you don't actually put 6ft in the distance setting on the AVR. You have to take in the reflections that will add to this time when it bounces to your floor, ceiling and side walls, it certainly will NOT be 6ft.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Oct 18 2020, 09:29 PM
SSJBen
post Oct 19 2020, 03:13 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 19 2020, 11:33 AM)
Perhaps its best to have the AVR built in advanced Audyssey xt32 calibration software to do its job.
*
Audyssey does a decent job at it as long as you place the mic properly.

That means using a tripod or better yet, a tripod with a boom arm to hold the mic. Do not put the mic on pillows or boxes to level it until it reaches ear height as the mic will pick up the resonances from those surfaces (yes pillows DO NOT entirely kill sound, they still reflect them!).
SSJBen
post Oct 23 2020, 03:10 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(chriscym @ Oct 23 2020, 02:11 PM)
All sifu here, a bit confusing here about Impedance level setting in the AVR.

My speaker support Nominal Impedance: 6 Ohms, do I need to set the AVR impedance to 6 Ohms? Default value of the Denon is 8 Ohms.
*
Do not touch the impedance switch. LEAVE it at its default 8ohms. Pretend the impedance switch doesn't even exist.

Reason is because when you switch the impedance on the receiver to 4ohms (or 6 or whatever it allows you), what you're actually doing is actively cutting the power by up to 50%. Why would you ever want to do that? The impedance switch is there on the receiver so that it can pass a UL rating.

A speaker's nominal impedance is just simplified rating. NO speakers on earth has a static impedance number. The impedance of a speaker goes all over the place, very dynamically based on the load and frequencies it is playing. Impedance is NOT a linear scale. 6ohms nominal generally means that is how low the speaker will go over the majority of frequencies it is capable of playing.
But if you constrict the power supply in the first place, it doesn't even matter if your speaker can hit 30hz flat on paper, it won't because there's simply not enough power for it to reach that low and hence you run into distortion.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Oct 23 2020, 03:55 PM
SSJBen
post Oct 23 2020, 04:04 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Ohm/impedance = resistance.

Guna logic sikit, why would you want to match impedance when that resistance is not even linear nor a fixed number in the first place?

It's not rocket science.
SSJBen
post Oct 24 2020, 04:19 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(voscar @ Oct 24 2020, 02:21 PM)
usually what is your casual listening db level? mine -23dB only coz house too small...
*
Volume on the receiver (or any amplifier) is not a linear scale. -23db in your room is different to -23db in my room for example. So you can't just directly ask people what volume they are at, because it's space dependent.

So if you want to know the average SPL, you need to get a SPL meter and measure at your listening spot how loud the summation of all the speakers are when you set the volume at certain value on the receiver. Theoretically all room calibration will try and match it where 0db = 85db average and 105db peaks. But auto room calibration isn't perfect and there can be errors in this, especially with the LFE and surround channels.
SSJBen
post Dec 20 2020, 10:25 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ben3003 @ Dec 20 2020, 09:41 PM)
guys, anyone heard of this aperion audio? I did some youtube audition vs svs prime i think its sound signature is to my liking. Similarly priced and they can ship to malaysia via their asia distribution centre
*
They don't ship to Msia lol. Already e-mailed them before. That Asia distro centre is only for SG.


QUOTE(mtgh @ Dec 20 2020, 09:29 PM)
Svs pbs 1000 and sb1000. Which is better choicr for 80% movie snd 20% music
*
Ported are nice for movies because below 30hz (which is where a lot of action movies have their bass mixed), the ported sub is 2-3 times louder than a sealed sub. With SVS ported subs, it doesn't mean they suck for music either.

This post has been edited by SSJBen: Dec 20 2020, 10:26 PM

18 Pages « < 11 12 13 14 15 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1087sec    0.61    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 12:59 PM