QUOTE(madballs @ Jul 26 2020, 10:44 PM)
Changing to wide yourself forces colours which were not meant to be used. It will oversaturared the intended colors unless the source is in wide. HDR usually use WCG, normal content usually normal gamut. So auto at let it define by source is the easiest way.
I can understand why you feel its nice. The color looks more pop'ish'. Like when u mismatch black level. But the more you look at it the more it feels wrong, at least to me.
If you want pop'ish' color you can crank up the color from default 50 to maybe 60 or 65.its not correct to do so but at least the color still looks more corrected than forcing WCG.
Increasing the color won't make what I want. If default color 50 and color gamut auto, it looks even dull than my LG 34” 34UC97G UltraWide IPS Monitor which I set as Cinema mode and no option to change color or color gamut or my previous Panasonic EX600K IPS LED TV. It actually look very washout.
If increase color to 60 or 65, it is a mix of washout + saturation depends on the color.
If increase to 70 everything look too saturation but still not deep in color.
Wide give me strong deep color I want but not saturation and also no washout, it looks balance, maybe it is not accurate but this is the correct one to me.
I read comment from Internet, the auto was actually call Normal previously, LG should not change to call auto as it is misleading, it won't change the color gamut even different source of BT. 709 or BT. 2020 is detect, it remain same. For wide one is using back the native panel color gamut and ignore the preset. As for extended, I find the output a bit like increasing color.
Change color gamut vs increasing color give very different output. Changing color gamut make color stronger and deeper but increasing color make color towards florescent and saturate.For this, I stick with color 50 and color gamut wide.
This post has been edited by Andrewtst: Jul 27 2020, 09:49 AM