Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Big breasts and round buttocks, have no practical evolutionary functions

views
     
yokoloco
post Dec 19 2015, 03:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,116 posts

Joined: Jun 2014
From: CatCity, Sarawak



As long as your didi happy
SUScrash123
post Dec 19 2015, 04:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
271 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 03:45 PM)
There is no benefit in telling the world big breasts and round butts have no practical functions, no money to be made.  sweat.gif
In fact, telling them the opposite would sell more "products" to increase breast or buttock size.
You are lying and just guessing.  sweat.gif  doh.gif
Well, according to the data, I dont do the research. lol
*
A new study explores the issue: "Are fat-bottomed girls smarter?" Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California at Santa Barbara put it scientifically: "Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?"

According to the Chicago Tribune, the answer is a resounding "yes." And there is icing on the cake. Researchers claim that broad-bottomed women also have smarter children.

In a study of more than 16,000 women, the curvy girls consistently outscored their skinny counterparts on intelligence tests. And there is icing on the cake. Children of curvier women outscored the children of slender moms too.

However, it is not simply a big butt that indicates a high IQ. What matters is the size of your hips in relation to the size of your waist.
kurangak
post Dec 19 2015, 04:06 PM

certified /k addict
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Deus Vult



QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 03:48 PM)
Those are fat tissues, no correlation in any research done.  sweat.gif
*
estrogen is female sex hormone #fact


higher sexual hormone during puberty leads to more developed breast and buttock size by promoting growth and accumulation of adipose(fat) tissue in that key area #fact

low estrogen level in women leads to possibility of suppression of ovulation and inadequate thickening of endometrial wall #fact

are u a woman? do u know why ur breast swells and feel tender ard the time u gonna menstruate?

This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 04:07 PM
TSStephMujan
post Dec 19 2015, 05:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Nov 2015
QUOTE(crash123 @ Dec 19 2015, 04:05 PM)
A new study explores the issue: "Are fat-bottomed girls smarter?" Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California at Santa Barbara put it scientifically: "Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?"

According to the Chicago Tribune, the answer is a resounding "yes." And there is icing on the cake. Researchers claim that broad-bottomed women also have smarter children.

In a study of more than 16,000 women, the curvy girls consistently outscored their skinny counterparts on intelligence tests. And there is icing on the cake. Children of curvier women outscored the children of slender moms too.

However, it is not simply a big butt that indicates a high IQ. What matters is the size of your hips in relation to the size of your waist.
*
Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation.
Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason. doh.gif
I cant even find any third party verification. sweat.gif


QUOTE(kurangak @ Dec 19 2015, 04:06 PM)
estrogen is female sex hormone #fact
higher sexual hormone during puberty leads to more developed breast and buttock size by promoting growth and accumulation of adipose(fat) tissue in that key area #fact

low estrogen level in women leads to possibility of suppression of ovulation and inadequate thickening of endometrial wall #fact

are u a woman? do u know why ur breast swells and feel tender ard the time u gonna menstruate?
*
Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences.
May I know where you get these "data" from?
arubin
post Dec 19 2015, 05:54 PM

Holy Pastafarian
****
Senior Member
670 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster


Skinny girls are obviously not getting enough nutrition, which means their kids won't be as healthy.

Big booty and nen-nen girl are healthier, which means babies also healthier.

Also? Who say no evolutionary purpose? Girls with big booty and nen-nen are more likely to get wealthier husbands which means more and healthier babies too.

Those girls who say no evolutionary purpose just jelly they don't have big booty and nen-nen. tongue.gif
river.sand
post Dec 19 2015, 05:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,816 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM)
Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.  sweat.gif
*
Dude, you are confused. What this article says is:
QUOTE
A new study found no connection between hip width and efficient locomotion...

The whole article, despite mentioning childbirth, actually focuses on locomotion.

As for the other article...
QUOTE
Other female primates do not have fat deposited on the rump. For example, the female gorilla has a skinny posterior and stores fat on her abdomen...

Babies of other primates do not have large brains, so large hip for easy child birth is not required. We just can't compare human to other primates.

This post has been edited by river.sand: Dec 19 2015, 06:05 PM
SUSsassyset
post Dec 19 2015, 06:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Sri Nilam, Ampang


but big boobs = higher confidence liao... my boobs are small, thus i has little confidence cry.gif
SUSslimey
post Dec 19 2015, 06:04 PM


*******
Senior Member
6,914 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Ts Bodo.

It's about fertility. Aka sex hormones
river.sand
post Dec 19 2015, 06:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,816 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM)
Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Too many myths already.  sweat.gif
*
But there are other theories...
QUOTE
Barash and Lipton report that full breasts could just as easily signal the truth about a woman's ability to store fat and her fertility. For example, flat-chested prepubescent girls are too young to bear children, and the sagging shrunken chests of older women may suggest they're past their prime.
http://www.livescience.com/32745-why-do-wo...ve-breasts.html
wordtalks
post Dec 19 2015, 06:14 PM

ɾıɥƃɟǝpɔqɐŕ�
*****
Senior Member
718 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: 2 holes
kesian ts, dint evolve correctly, its for the offspring duh
SUSavatargod
post Dec 19 2015, 06:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
32 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
TS, how bout your puberty transformation? Ada bulat bulat?
TSStephMujan
post Dec 19 2015, 06:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Nov 2015
QUOTE(river.sand @ Dec 19 2015, 06:12 PM)
That's interesting. smile.gif

QUOTE(avatargod @ Dec 19 2015, 06:21 PM)
TS,  how bout your puberty transformation? Ada bulat bulat?
*
Everyone has some? sweat.gif
olman
post Dec 19 2015, 06:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,998 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


I tasted more than 1 handful

Conclusion yes asset is vital hhhnnggghhh
cyhborg
post Dec 19 2015, 06:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM)

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm
*
did you even read the article you linked?

kurangak
post Dec 19 2015, 07:48 PM

certified /k addict
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Deus Vult



QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 05:42 PM)
Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation.
Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason.  doh.gif
I cant even find any third party verification.  sweat.gif
Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences.
May I know where you get these "data" from?
*
from the books n literatures that i studied back in university time. n experience told by my ex gfs n my wife. smile.gif

btw do u take birth control pills? do u know the mechanism of action of those pills?

This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 07:51 PM
TSStephMujan
post Dec 19 2015, 11:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Nov 2015
QUOTE(kurangak @ Dec 19 2015, 07:48 PM)
from the books n literatures that i studied back in university time. n experience told by my ex gfs n my wife. smile.gif

btw do u take birth control pills? do u know the mechanism of action of those pills?
*
Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no.
You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by StephMujan: Dec 19 2015, 11:01 PM
SUSLVL1NiNjA
post Dec 19 2015, 11:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
753 posts

Joined: Dec 2013


Tak suka pergi main bontot, nothing has changed alot in that area.
kurangak
post Dec 19 2015, 11:05 PM

certified /k addict
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Deus Vult



QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 11:00 PM)
Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no.
You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone.  sweat.gif
*
a simple google on those facts that ive given to u would be suffice...

dun expect me to spoonfeed u... besides all those literature that ive read is on hard copy. u dun expect me to gip u which page, wat title, wat publication number to u rite?
-Aktan-
post Dec 19 2015, 11:09 PM

2.6b dah masuk bro
*****
Senior Member
873 posts

Joined: Dec 2009



QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM)
sweat.gif  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/ma...-size-evolution

So women get these features because men choose them for aesthetics, just like how some dog breeder force breed dogs with cute but weak/useless features.  sweat.gif
After many generation of selective partnership, bigger breasts and rounder buttocks become more common among female offspring, but there are no practical or scientific functions for these features, other than pleasing men.  doh.gif
Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.  sweat.gif
*
so u are big butt???
xxVeronicaxx
post Dec 19 2015, 11:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Dec 2013




4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.81    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 12:50 PM