As long as your didi happy
Big breasts and round buttocks, have no practical evolutionary functions
Big breasts and round buttocks, have no practical evolutionary functions
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 03:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,116 posts Joined: Jun 2014 From: CatCity, Sarawak |
As long as your didi happy
|
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 04:05 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
271 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 03:45 PM) There is no benefit in telling the world big breasts and round butts have no practical functions, no money to be made. A new study explores the issue: "Are fat-bottomed girls smarter?" Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California at Santa Barbara put it scientifically: "Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?"In fact, telling them the opposite would sell more "products" to increase breast or buttock size. You are lying and just guessing. Well, according to the data, I dont do the research. lol According to the Chicago Tribune, the answer is a resounding "yes." And there is icing on the cake. Researchers claim that broad-bottomed women also have smarter children. In a study of more than 16,000 women, the curvy girls consistently outscored their skinny counterparts on intelligence tests. And there is icing on the cake. Children of curvier women outscored the children of slender moms too. However, it is not simply a big butt that indicates a high IQ. What matters is the size of your hips in relation to the size of your waist. |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,170 posts Joined: Apr 2011 From: Deus Vult |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 03:48 PM) estrogen is female sex hormone #facthigher sexual hormone during puberty leads to more developed breast and buttock size by promoting growth and accumulation of adipose(fat) tissue in that key area #fact low estrogen level in women leads to possibility of suppression of ovulation and inadequate thickening of endometrial wall #fact are u a woman? do u know why ur breast swells and feel tender ard the time u gonna menstruate? This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 04:07 PM |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 05:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
155 posts Joined: Nov 2015 |
QUOTE(crash123 @ Dec 19 2015, 04:05 PM) A new study explores the issue: "Are fat-bottomed girls smarter?" Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California at Santa Barbara put it scientifically: "Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?" Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation. According to the Chicago Tribune, the answer is a resounding "yes." And there is icing on the cake. Researchers claim that broad-bottomed women also have smarter children. In a study of more than 16,000 women, the curvy girls consistently outscored their skinny counterparts on intelligence tests. And there is icing on the cake. Children of curvier women outscored the children of slender moms too. However, it is not simply a big butt that indicates a high IQ. What matters is the size of your hips in relation to the size of your waist. Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason. I cant even find any third party verification. QUOTE(kurangak @ Dec 19 2015, 04:06 PM) estrogen is female sex hormone #fact Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences. higher sexual hormone during puberty leads to more developed breast and buttock size by promoting growth and accumulation of adipose(fat) tissue in that key area #fact low estrogen level in women leads to possibility of suppression of ovulation and inadequate thickening of endometrial wall #fact are u a woman? do u know why ur breast swells and feel tender ard the time u gonna menstruate? May I know where you get these "data" from? |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 05:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
670 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster |
Skinny girls are obviously not getting enough nutrition, which means their kids won't be as healthy.
Big booty and nen-nen girl are healthier, which means babies also healthier. Also? Who say no evolutionary purpose? Girls with big booty and nen-nen are more likely to get wealthier husbands which means more and healthier babies too. Those girls who say no evolutionary purpose just jelly they don't have big booty and nen-nen. |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 05:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,816 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM) Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true. Dude, you are confused. What this article says is:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm Too many myths already. QUOTE A new study found no connection between hip width and efficient locomotion... The whole article, despite mentioning childbirth, actually focuses on locomotion. As for the other article... QUOTE Other female primates do not have fat deposited on the rump. For example, the female gorilla has a skinny posterior and stores fat on her abdomen... Babies of other primates do not have large brains, so large hip for easy child birth is not required. We just can't compare human to other primates. This post has been edited by river.sand: Dec 19 2015, 06:05 PM |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Sri Nilam, Ampang |
but big boobs = higher confidence liao... my boobs are small, thus i has little confidence
|
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,914 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
Ts Bodo.
It's about fertility. Aka sex hormones |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,816 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM) Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false. But there are other theories...http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc Too many myths already. QUOTE Barash and Lipton report that full breasts could just as easily signal the truth about a woman's ability to store fat and her fertility. For example, flat-chested prepubescent girls are too young to bear children, and the sagging shrunken chests of older women may suggest they're past their prime. http://www.livescience.com/32745-why-do-wo...ve-breasts.html |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
718 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: 2 holes |
kesian ts, dint evolve correctly, its for the offspring duh
|
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:21 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
32 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
TS, how bout your puberty transformation? Ada bulat bulat?
|
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:24 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
155 posts Joined: Nov 2015 |
QUOTE(river.sand @ Dec 19 2015, 06:12 PM) That's interesting. QUOTE(avatargod @ Dec 19 2015, 06:21 PM) Everyone has some? |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:29 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,998 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
I tasted more than 1 handful
Conclusion yes asset is vital hhhnnggghhh |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 06:31 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM) Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 07:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,170 posts Joined: Apr 2011 From: Deus Vult |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 05:42 PM) Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation. from the books n literatures that i studied back in university time. n experience told by my ex gfs n my wife. Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason. I cant even find any third party verification. Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences. May I know where you get these "data" from? btw do u take birth control pills? do u know the mechanism of action of those pills? This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 07:51 PM |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 11:00 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
155 posts Joined: Nov 2015 |
QUOTE(kurangak @ Dec 19 2015, 07:48 PM) from the books n literatures that i studied back in university time. n experience told by my ex gfs n my wife. Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no.btw do u take birth control pills? do u know the mechanism of action of those pills? You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone. This post has been edited by StephMujan: Dec 19 2015, 11:01 PM |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 11:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
753 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
Tak suka pergi main bontot, nothing has changed alot in that area.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 11:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,170 posts Joined: Apr 2011 From: Deus Vult |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 11:00 PM) Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no. a simple google on those facts that ive given to u would be suffice...You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone. dun expect me to spoonfeed u... besides all those literature that ive read is on hard copy. u dun expect me to gip u which page, wat title, wat publication number to u rite? |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 11:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
873 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
QUOTE(StephMujan @ Dec 19 2015, 01:40 PM) http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/ma...-size-evolution So women get these features because men choose them for aesthetics, just like how some dog breeder force breed dogs with cute but weak/useless features. After many generation of selective partnership, bigger breasts and rounder buttocks become more common among female offspring, but there are no practical or scientific functions for these features, other than pleasing men. Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false. http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm Too many myths already. |
|
|
Dec 19 2015, 11:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#60
|
![]()
Junior Member
17 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0175sec
0.81
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 12:50 PM |