http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/ma...-size-evolution

So women get these features because men choose them for aesthetics, just like how some dog breeder force breed dogs with cute but weak/useless features. 
After many generation of selective partnership, bigger breasts and rounder buttocks become more common among female offspring, but there are no practical or scientific functions for these features, other than pleasing men. 

Those are fat tissues, no correlation in any research done. 

Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation.
Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason. 
I cant even find any third party verification. 
Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences.
May I know where you get these "data" from?

Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no.
You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone. 

Em, I thought you made the claim first?
Burden of evidence is on the claimer? 
If I made a claim and someone ask for evidence, do I ask them to provide the evidence instead? No logic right? 
I'm not skinny, but not very curvy like movie stars.

Sorry, cant take your words without evidence.
"Google it" or "find it yourself" is not a good answer.