http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/ma...-size-evolution

So women get these features because men choose them for aesthetics, just like how some dog breeder force breed dogs with cute but weak/useless features.
After many generation of selective partnership, bigger breasts and rounder buttocks become more common among female offspring, but there are no practical or scientific functions for these features, other than pleasing men.


Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.

This post has been edited by StephMujan: Dec 19 2015, 03:47 PM

You tak suke, you pigi cari achik.

you mean ancient people got small to no boob and flat butt? which universe they do research?

so.. care to share your measurements steph?

then mengikut TS, those batang besar only just for show, no practical usage.

Bodoh.. without big breast and round buttocks, how to attract billionaire to kawin them...

To me big boobs and butt = fat people. If u are thin and have those, = cosmetic job. Sorry i'm no fan of Barbie Girl.

I dont really measure them?
I only know my weight due to work requirement.
I dont think being too self conscious is good, lazy to keep track.

Actually, its different for males, longer and bigger penises may have a competitive function.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20...a-health-weird/

There are skinny women big large breasts and buttocks, its just genetic.
Due to selective breeding.

The way u talk is like farm people. Its not like there are any benefits in having big boobs and butts. The human physical balance also lost. If u farm people for meat, that makes a lot of sense.

Who says for aesthetics only?
Bigger breast = more milk
Bigger hips = better for child bearing

Plop2 weiii

No drillz fail tered

Imagine kim kardashian now.... dammm

so does vegeterians

big nenen,.. more milk,.. who said no evolutionary use ??

whoever wrote that article must be airport with no ass
using 'scientific' articles to justify their buthurtness

Its not my choice to make, its both male and female preference.
Humans do selectively breed with desirable partners, not randomly, so yes we are farming each other.
But the problem is we dont choose rationally, just like some dog breeds are created for cuteness but very weak and get sick easily.

Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.

Actually, vegetarian diet is good for some people, but not all.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562864

Thin anorexia wimminz will hurt my balls, my hips and my thigh when sexing..

Not a pleasant feeling, its like fucuking a hard plywood with the edges constantly hitting your balls.

Sorry, all those thin as fucuk wimmiz are banned from my list..kalau they nekid pun I dunwan.

See my link below, already proven false for a long time.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc


I dont think the researchers and professors are paid to make false claims.
They would be fired by their employers.