Nobody can be misled when the Masters certificate clearly has MIT on it. Also nobody will curse me cuz all my info is legit from MIT and MISI and its available to anybody who asks unlike the 'info' you provided. I dont make up information. I get the info, i do my research and i propagate the info if its legit. You on the other hand, make blind statements first and then realise the hard way that ure wrong but sadly lack the intellectual maturity to admit a fault and move on choosing instead to employ desperate measures of sending 2 ambiguous queries to MISI of which one is meaningless while the other clearly proves your earlier hypothesis on MISI students not being part of the MIT Alumni WRONG.

Lets dwell a little longer on this alumni topic while we're at it using this excerpt from MIT:

Associate Member

An individual who has participated in non-degree-granting special programs or in joint programs that meet time and admission criteria as determined by the Alumni Association Board of Directors.

Current approved programs are as follows: (MISI) Malaysia Institute for Supply Chain Innovation, HST (Harvard/MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology), SPURS (Special Program for Urban and Regional Studies), MIT-Zaragoza International Logistics Program, Knight Journalism Fellows, and the Cambridge-MIT Exchange Program.

Oh did i read that right? MIT Alumni Association actually lists the so called 'dud/fluke' program of MISI on its list of approved ALumni membership courses.

Ive challenged you intellectually and clarified each and every one of your silly statements. Sadly, until now you have yet to provide a single 'fact' or 'proof' to support any of your statements. I know its embarassing.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Nov 24 2014, 03:16 PM

provide prove... show the cert... with the MIT's name on it...

show ur research*, i have already prove students of MISI are not students of MIT... MIT so easily print the cert for MISI students? at most it is part of the network not MIT itself

Uve not proven anything. In fact u have just shot yourself in the foot. You said MISI students are NOT part of MIT Alumni. AGain u blatantly made that stupid statement without checking and only when i told u that you were wrong, did u go to the Alumni website to check. And woohaa...MISI program graduates are part of MIT Alumni. It must be painful to be embarassed like this on LYN.

Hey bro, have the GUTS to email MISI direct AGAIN and post the questions ive listed above if you dare la. All these questions originated from your silly statements from the beginning so have the GUTS to stand by your own words and prove me wrong. The onus is on YOU not me.

But we all know that you wont. Typical.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Nov 24 2014, 03:29 PM

Ask around. Im sure the answer to your question is readily available.

again? why do i have to email why dont you show the cert...? i dont need to prove, email clearly says MISI students are NOT MIT students.. clearly MISI is MISI not MIT.. just part of a network started by MIT but in no way MIT

this is the second time you say i wont.. typical

Read my earlier posts la bro. Stop making a fool out of yourself. I said ive SEEN the cert. Why assume its through an email? Its you who is contradicting my statement so the onus is on YOU to prove me wrong. You have the avenue to do this since u already emailed MISI once so why back off now and hide behind the 'why me' line? COuld it be because you already asked but are too ashamed to admit?

As for the definition of 'student', isnt that a stupid question u asked? Are u expecting full time students studying at MIT in Boston 14,894km from MISI, KL to be called the same???

And why the constant focus on the terminology of a student while remaining silent on the Alumni now? Could it be because you have found out (the hard way) that MISI grads are in fact part of the MIT Alumni as Associate Members?

U really should have taken your own advice and backed off about 4 posts back when you said you would. Im just loving this moment. Im gonna continue to bask in the glory of seeing u like a fish out of water. Desperately trying to salvage some form of pride.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Nov 24 2014, 03:53 PM

you said you have SEEN? stop making a fool of urself.. u expect the whole world to believe you, prove urself... stop blabbing and show the world not SEEN! cause seen dont mean shit

a student at INSEAD sg is a student of INSEAD from france... now this MISI aint MIT

"associate member", do you even know what's the meaning of associate? meaning you're not part of it but somehow allowed to be affiliated... an associate member at IEM cant sign any engineering doc.. all real estate agents, insurance agents can claim to be 'associate' directors' of watever agency... but it is all 'associate' ... if MISI is by MIT, why not give full member status?

yada yada yada... stop blabbering n provide prove... not SEEN, because it doesnt mean a thing

YAWN! Same old roundabout replies. Its you who clearly has lost the plot altogether.

If my info isnt good enough for u, then why not take up my earlier challange and email MISI / MIT direct with the list of queries i put up earlier based on what YOU said? Why no action till now? Who's the greater fool now? Typical.

WALK THE TALK!

still want to claim MISI is MIT? still wanna fool ppl? still want to be stubborn? up to you... with no facts and just your "SEEN" you want to claim so many bullshit... who lost the plot?

ur info? more like from mouth... typical... all tok cock no prove.. wanna blabber somemore...

I think you need to read and understand what i mentioned. Earlier u mentioned "Ask those in the working industry in UK and they will tell u that Strathclyde is more recognised than Lancaster for their MBA programs. "

I asked for evidence on your statement above. I mentioned "Those rank above 50 in ft, eg Strathclyde or Lancaster n the likes are all in the same category, nobody really cares which is better." Is Insead ranked above 50 in ft? What makes you think that i am comparing Lancaster/strathclyde with insead? I have already mentioned LBS, iese and insead are the good uni londoners know. If ask them to compare strathclyde with lancaster which is better... nobody really cares coz they are same category (above 50 in ft).

Secondly, u mentioned "Strathclyde MBA program has better quality program participants"
How do u know strathclyde MBA students are higher quality than Lancaster? While both are relatively easy to enter, In fact Lancaster have slightly more stringent entry req.

Whilst its good to have high aspirations to join insead, It is not appropriate to simply pass a judgement without quoting a reliable source, be it academic or corporate world.

This post has been edited by turbopips: Nov 25 2014, 02:00 AM

Will you take stchalyde or lancaster Programme if you got full scholarship? And currently you have a job rm 7k

I'm curious too, why was the Manchester MBA stopped from Sunway college? Sorry, I don't know anyone in the industry to ask around. Do enlighten please.
Thanks.

Funny how u word your questions in a certain way as to ensure the answer you receive 'fits in' to the response you want.

The certificate comes with the following wording:
MIT-Malaysia Master of Science in Supply Chain Management

It also has the MIT Global SCALE logo on the cert.

So if the cert has the title above with the MIT logo and students are MIT Alumni, why would i bother if the cert is physically issued by MIT itself? Same goes for the graduation question which is another stupid question. Would the location of the graduation ceremony have a bearing on the career path of the student?

Im beginning to think ure another one of those hot air blowers with not much substance. And im still waiting for you to post the questions i dared u to ask earlier since those questions orginated from your own blind statements made earlier.

Why keep diverting i wonder? LOL

And i thought you had some substance too. Guess i was wrong.

Email Manchester Uni direct. Their response will be official. All i will say on LYN now is Sunway brought in some 'terms' which had an effect the quality of the program delivery which is something that Lancaster agreed to later on. Manchester also had to deal with program 'requirements' from Malaysia.

Will let you draw your own conclusions.

Anyone here study MBA wit segi college UOG ?

Why? Are u interested?

Vague. I'm guessing some race/politics-linked reasons. Thanks anyways.

Yep, just try to ask any other program that cost like 20k plus. Had checked out this MBA in segi