QUOTE(jloi @ Sep 7 2015, 07:51 PM)
Bro, great effort.Maybe can invest a proper mic
【Micro Four Thirds】Olympus & Panasonic Thread V7, Stay tuned for m4/3 news in Photokina!
|
|
Sep 7 2015, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2015, 03:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Sep 8 2015, 11:59 PM) Ehhh is there such close focus ring for m43? I used to see it around but it gone as time goes on. All i know there only produce for sony emount. Also does the crop factor annoy you? I bought from here: http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?spm=a230r....bucket=2#detailThis is LM-M43 adapter. |
|
|
Sep 9 2015, 03:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2015, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2015, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 9 2015, 03:32 PM) The official name from Voigtlander for E Mount is "Voigtlander VM-E Close Focus Adapter"http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1022...MP_saAoHV8P8HAQ |
|
|
Sep 9 2015, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Sep 9 2015, 04:25 PM) So i suppose the m43 mount is the same thing as voiglander mount for sony e lens. Funny thing is that why voigtlander did not do the same thing for m43 since they made diff converter adapter for m43 considering they have the tool and machine to do make such items. Yes, doing the same task. China good in copy.Thanks for the link and pity our ringgit sucks since USD is used for all deal made online I actually have the China & Voigtlander version of VM-E close focusing for my A7II, they are doing the same job. The only different is the Voigtlander built is very very solid and heavy! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 10 2015, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(BOTAK_WAI @ Sep 10 2015, 02:35 PM) 43 Rumors Headlines Zhongyi 25mm F0.95 doesn't mount on EM5 mark I. I read from China forum. Will share the link later. (In Chinese)- Zhongyi 25mm f/0.95 lens will cost $499. Poll: Would you buy it? - Olympus stops the E-M10II sales because of a manufacturing issue. - Patent shows also Olympus is working on a Dual IS system (just like you have in the GX8). http://www.43rumors.com/ This post has been edited by philipcs: Sep 10 2015, 02:39 PM |
|
|
Sep 10 2015, 03:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(BOTAK_WAI @ Sep 10 2015, 02:45 PM) Yes, this one. |
|
|
Sep 10 2015, 11:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2015, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Aug 27 2015, 11:07 PM) Bro, GW-1 arrived.It's thread size is 37mm, no need stepping ring, direct attach to PL 12-32mm Wide Angle conversion lens GW-1 for sell. by Philip Pang, on FlickrThis post has been edited by philipcs: Sep 11 2015, 04:06 PM |
|
|
Sep 11 2015, 08:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 11 2015, 05:17 PM) Like nothing Wide Angle conversion lens GW-1 for sale. by Philip Pang, on FlickrThis post has been edited by philipcs: Sep 11 2015, 08:28 PM |
|
|
Sep 11 2015, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 11 2015, 11:26 PM) That's good, not too heavy. The Gw-1 has a 0.75x wide-angle converter effect right? That means, on the pana 12-32 it will have a 9mm-24mm am I correct? Please also confirm that the mounting thread is a 37mm. Based on calculator, yes. 24 x 0.75 = 18mm equivalent. User manual said it mount on GH1 adapter (37mm) for Ricoh GRD 1 / 2. You can google Ricoh GH1 for confirmation. I didn't have any lens with 37mm thread size, I cannot try. Not sure how it look like with 12-32mm either |
|
|
Sep 14 2015, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Sep 14 2015, 12:26 AM) Bro, some weird combo i got recently Got the FD-LM adapter from TB. Sorry for the off M43 topic When Canon FD meets Ricoh GXR by Philip Pang, on FlickrTest shot with Canon FD Macro 100mm F4 Sony RX100 III | Taken by Ricoh GXR Mount A12 + Canon FD Macro 100mm F4 by Philip Pang, on FlickrThis post has been edited by philipcs: Sep 14 2015, 05:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2015, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Sep 14 2015, 09:26 PM) Dude, you should try some of the Canon old LTM lens. More fitting to the whole theme of GXR of being compact. Or you shd try old pentax super takumar m42 lens, they are quite compact as well The adapter for LM mount quite expensive, so can only try with 1 Just for fun, because those Canon FD mainly for my A7II. |
|
|
Sep 16 2015, 03:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(minizian @ Sep 16 2015, 03:08 PM) Sad they abandon it but to be honest its still a nice camera to use. Used unit are selling at a cheap. I still shopping for my nice grip promoted in M43 rumor but since our RM went down the drain i decide not to buy For me, I jumped ship from Nikon DSLR to M43. Never look back.I suppose for normal folks like us, a M43 camera will do much of any work thrown at it. I still grateful i did not get myself DSLR as i nearly (as in was in shop handling camera itself) bought it. Tat compactness mean i can throw 2 m43 camera and ricoh GXR into one sling bag I still got question from other why i choose M43 instead of Nikon or canon |
|
|
Sep 19 2015, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 19 2015, 10:33 AM) Just got it from Post Office a while back after so many days, even the packaging box "kemek" edy:sweat: Welcome! Would love to see your photo from this combo The lens is in good shape though First look impressions: The Ricoh GW-1 is very tiny (love the size) and seems very very well made, from Japan. The lens seems to be multi-coated both front & rear elements, no markings of filter/diameter size. Lens body is non-slippery in fact, very grippy finishing. Love this tiny lens though. Thanks bro! Can't wait to try it on my Pana 12-32. |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 07:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 20 2015, 06:14 PM) Here's some test shots of the Ricoh GW-1 + Panasonic 12-32 combo. Good stuff! Great to see it work well with 12-32mm. There is vignetting at the wide-end when the GW-1 is mounted over the UV filter left on the lens and when the UV filter is taken off, no more vignetting! Yay! However, when the UV filter is mounted, the vignetting is gone when zoomed to around 14mm (which is 10.5mm i.e. 14 x 0.75) though not bad already but I will take off the uv filter over the 12-32 and I will get a new filter over the GW-1 (no mention of diameter though since there seems to be no thread afterall Findings: Yes, this combo does work! 1. 12-32 at 12mm without GW1 [attachmentid=4972214] 2. GW1 mounted over UV filter still on the 12-32, vignetting is present [attachmentid=4972215] 3. Vignetting gone when zoomed to 14mm [attachmentid=4972222] 4. Finally, after taking off the UV filter, no more vignetting at 12mm [attachmentid=4972224] Yes, that's my dinner if you are wondering |
|
|
Sep 20 2015, 10:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(bobds78 @ Sep 20 2015, 10:03 PM) I didn't notice any distortion either but I am sure at this wide 12 x 0.75 = 9mm (equiv. 18mm in 35mm term) there bound to be distortion for sure, not noticeable in the pic due to the angle but there seems to be a bit at the black shelf at the background though blur so not so much noticeable. It should be more pronounce if shooting straight-lined objects. Ricoh quality is always tiptop especially this GW1 is to pair with GR camera We will see as I will be putting this combo to work. No doubt, this setup is a killer combo than getting a 7-18 or similar or a prime. |
|
|
Sep 21 2015, 07:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(BOTAK_WAI @ Sep 20 2015, 11:17 PM) 37mm and 43mm mounting thread size of all those converter lenses from Ricoh were odd once but now they all have became hidden gems for m43 lens TC-1 = 1.88x teleconversion lens (43mm mounting thread size)so what next? Ricoh GT-1 1.43x teleconversion lens? to make your 12-32mm f3.5-5.6 become 17-45mm f3.5-5.6 A bit Ricoh conversion lenses info for other who are interested: GW-2 = 0.75x wide conversion lens (43mm mounting thread size) GW-1 = 0.75x wide conversion lens (37mm mounting thread size) DW-5 = 0.8x wide conversion lens (37mm mounting thread size) DW-6 = 0.79x wide conversion lens (43mm mounting thread size) TC-1 = 1.88x teleconversion lens (43mm mounting thread size) GT-1 = 1.43x teleconversion lens (37mm mounting thread size) RMB99 only! http://world.taobao.com/item/520756050685....0.Ag0l7K#detail |
|
|
Sep 22 2015, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,581 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Someonesim @ Sep 22 2015, 01:20 PM) How is the Meike one compare to FL600R ? Weight, size, power and recharge speed. I have the Meike 320 for my Fuji X100s & A7II.I had FL600R now, weight is ok if pair with 12 40 lens. Power is not bad although cant fight highest end Speedlite etc, recharge rate felt ok for me, not sure if those exp speedlite could go much faster or not As for A7II unit, i did the comparison with Nissin i40. i40 is much powerful in ceiling bounce flash and I feel like Meike 320 is much under power. Recycle also much slower than i40. I am not sure is my Meiki 320 lemon or memang like that. Also not sure is the same for Olympus model. As of FL600R, i am using and no complain at all. Wireless Trigger work flawlessly. This post has been edited by philipcs: Sep 22 2015, 02:05 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0251sec
1.15
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 09:31 AM |