was wondering,...since many had said that, for investment of less than1 year, the XIRR calculation is not accurate....
will using this (the above) will solve the problem?

won't as in not accurate?

I recall some months back.....some forummers "posted" about their high IRR rate...
though of thinking that this formula can be used to avoid confusion...

yes,....
what if 'that formula" were to be used....will it shows a more accurate representation?

yes......I would understand if it was referring to x.xxxx vs x.xxxxxxxxxx in IRR cal
but for irr cal of less than 1 yr that formula would not be good to be used also?

This post has been edited by yklooi: Aug 10 2015, 01:13 AM

some would loves it, some would hates it, some would says there is no fun in it....
FSM Managed Portfolios—Let the Experts Manage Your Money August 7, 2015
FSM Managed Portfolios are officially launched!
http://www.fundsupermart.com.hk/hk/main/re...articleNo=10193

I would just wonder when it will come to M'sia

thanks for clarifying.....
so when the maths is correct then obviously it can be used as a meaningful representation even if the investment is less than 1 year?

This post has been edited by yklooi: Aug 11 2015, 04:08 PM

rephrased the question in post# 1118...
so when the maths is correct then obviously it can be used as a meaningful representation even if the investment is less than 1 year?

This post has been edited by yklooi: Aug 11 2015, 04:08 PM

thanks for taking the time and patient to explain....

deleted...already posted by David...

This post has been edited by yklooi: Aug 11 2015, 07:47 PM

actually still
first I am clear that on this "If the maths is correct, it cannot be 'more accurate'. Or less accurate".

then I got this..." we are projecting or extrapolating the ROI% to its annualised IRR rate, and how many times we are extrapolating it depends on how closed is the investment time to 1-year. The shorter is the invested time, the more times we are extrapolating it.

So, if you truly understand how the maths works, and the whole process of converting the ROI% to IRR, then it is up to you whether you want to do it or not. Then the answer is obvious whether it is still "a meaningful representation even if the investment is less than 1 year".

eventhough I am still ...but will Let the above thoughts sink in first, before giving up! ...until I can get a definite "YES" or "NO" answer to "is IRR a meaningful representation even if the investment is less than 1 year?"

I got KGF....now ROI +0.34....
expected it to be negatives from Today KLCI drops

Yes.....but then there are other region/countries with more attractive valuations-wor

Looks like there is another FH option to select if wanted to invest in Japan....
http://www.eastspringinvestments.com.my/do...nd_Infomemo.pdf

FSM don't have yet.

page 18
http://www.eastspringinvestments.com.my/do...nd_Infomemo.pdf




Attached thumbnail(s)

just switched abt my China funds to Bolehland.
RHB Em Opp fund and HSO

31 July factsheet
Italy??



Attached thumbnail(s)

isn't it IRR is a better showing, as it "smoothen" the ups and downs?...

looks like it,...as TA European, India also up but their indexes did not reflects thou.

while reading thru the last weeks posts about EQ:FI ratios.....I recalled having read this data a few months back from this article.....

Mythbusting: Frequent Rebalancing Improves Portfolio Returns
http://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/resea...l?articleNo=566

looks surprised! or



Attached thumbnail(s)

page# 63, post# 1259
maybe applicable or worth consideration?