Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
14 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V17

views
     
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 01:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jul 4 2015, 10:41 AM)
Essm right? Why suddenly change back again to mica
*
QUOTE(azriel @ Jul 4 2015, 10:59 AM)
IINM News about the ESSM first came from Marhalim's blog. By looking again at his article it was just "talk around town" or rumours with no confirmation either from Boustead or the RMN.
*
in Lima already got new MBDA receive LOI on VL-Mica
just not high hope on Gowind, they just continue follow plan to do.
nothing much can change. just asw frigate. air defense not priority on this ship.
from now on, we just focus on construction progress.
hopefully not delay any more.

icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 4 2015, 01:48 PM
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 02:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jul 4 2015, 12:12 PM)
*On not so friendly news

Chinese PLAN type 054A boat live-fire air defense missile drills

user posted image

Just me or it look darn similar to SM3 missile hmm.gif

*
It also look like sm2 missile, and size also about same,
but than range only 40km, seems very old tech missile (liquid propellant) .
not sure status our MOU with china on HQ16 SAM。

waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 02:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(kron_ka @ Jul 4 2015, 01:58 PM)
An LMV sounds like a patrol boat on steroids with a helicopter pad.
*
ya,

it 90% same design with dcns Gowind 1000. i expected they pay some price to dcns to get license.
ship bridge same enhance design like our Gowind/Gowind2500

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 4 2015, 02:17 PM
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 02:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(yinchet @ Jul 4 2015, 02:25 PM)
Nope.
it is an cooperation design btw singapore and saab.
*
more not logic,if cooperation,not use Saab item?
i means saab navy radar, sensor etc。。 hmm.gif
anyway still look like Gowind
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 03:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(yinchet @ Jul 4 2015, 02:45 PM)
http://www.janes.com/article/52732/singapo...-mission-vessel
btw gowind class 1000 tonage are darn ugly
*
i still like
Gowind 1000 on enhance design at 2014
sample, stealth and clean design. 360 bridge view

OPV spec
user posted image

Corvette spec
user posted image

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 4 2015, 03:28 PM
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 06:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jul 4 2015, 04:23 PM)
tat one DCNS ownself built and try to convince the french navy to purchase the gowind design by giving to them for free

Nonetheless, it ugly as fark even for a ship standard

somehow, they manage to sell the design to us. Luckily it not as ugly as that  L'Adroit laugh.gif
*
more like POC ship, than give to France navy used for 3 year, than dcns can resell to any navy, so far still not sell it. they put price tag Euro 200 million.
waja2000
post Jul 4 2015, 06:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(thpace @ Jul 4 2015, 04:13 PM)
drool.gif  drool.gif  drool.gif
*
just fans boy design,
many design not logic and mistake,
i can say impossible to make it. tongue.gif
waja2000
post Jul 7 2015, 05:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
read new many fresh grade from Uni un-employed ...
maybe GOV can more attract more from them join army RMAF/RMN/RMA。。。
more and more high-tech weapon and sensor/system like new Gowind ship need more skill crew too...

waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 09:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(LTZ @ Jul 8 2015, 09:23 AM)
Tgk...... kenya pun pakai heli camni
*
no choose only use this...
if got $$$ they also not get this.

waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 09:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(LTZ @ Jul 8 2015, 09:23 AM)
Tgk...... kenya pun pakai heli camni
*
no choose only use this...
if got $$$ they also not get this.

waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 10:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(azriel @ Jul 8 2015, 10:39 AM)
politician off course follow public will said Gov military procurement is wasting money.... than they will get support. biggrin.gif
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 10:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jul 8 2015, 09:32 AM)
So what? plain little bird choppers ni murah giler, pastu tak berapa utilitarian pun (transport boleh isi 2-3 org je, klu gunship version pun x bleh bwk senjata berat2). So knapa pulak nk heran klu Kenya ada?  laugh.gif
*
well it still alot people support and push this Ah-6i to Gov use at Esscom. and price not cheap as your think, it cost usd 9.2 million each (saudi price) include ammo, support maintenance , parts, training.
if wan cheap,i more prefer get more AW109LUH.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 10:59 AM
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 11:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jul 8 2015, 11:05 AM)
This type of helicopter is not that much useful outside of special operations. It has too short of a range, carries too few personnel and has a low weapons weight limit.
*
Not only AH6i, also MD530D alot people still aim cheap price.
Agree, i still prefer ESSCOM and all other country area use proper Attack helicopter, due to long range needed and fire power, also distance to base and sea require long range. prefer,WZ10, Tiger or T129 Atak, all can fly more than 500km with weapon. we need more bigger picture.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 11:16 AM
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 11:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Jul 8 2015, 11:19 AM)
but these are the heavy weight over kill against insurgent that practices guerilla warfare.
it'll take long prep time to launch and probably not as agile as fast/light attach chopper.
no doubt it'll still solve the problem with the insurgency,
but imagine carrying a .50Cal sniper rifle into a paint ball fight
overkill and over cost.
*
well not really, in base always have heli on standby which can take off in 5min. unless the SOP is not require, than same to any heli.
if worry on sniper than all heli is same, include Ah6i or MD530D.
A proper Attach heli have better optical and sensor they can fly in more safety range like 1-2km or more and do the reconnaissance .... also their on onboard sensor can detect intruder gun fire to them. and they have more fire power to chase the insurgent. also if got insurgent, army also will deploy with Attack heli to assist with reconnaissance and firepower.

QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jul 8 2015, 11:24 AM)
Nope, COIN operations like in ESSCOM don't need that kind of firepower. A good, reliable long-range helicopter with a good weight limit (mainly to drop off and retrieve widely-scattered patrol groups) to do basic scouting and act as a light gunship if necessary is much more preferable.
*
As i said we should see more bigger picture, getting proper attach helicopter not limit use in Esscom, it just one of mission, is overall increase strange to Army, it can use in all place in country if needed. as your mention, our current AW109LUH already can do.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 11:44 AM
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 11:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Jul 8 2015, 11:44 AM)
y not get the aas-72x concept, u can bring patrol + the chopper itself is armed
Specifications (UH-72A)[edit]
Data from UH-72 specifications,[60] Eurocopter EC 145 data[61]
General characteristics

Crew: 1 or 2 pilots
Capacity: 9 troops or 2 stretchers and medical crew
Length: 42 ft 7 in (13.03 m)
Rotor diameter: 36 ft 1 in (11.0 m)
Height: 11 ft 9 in (3.45 m)
Disc area: 1,023 ft² (94.98 m²)
Empty weight: 3,951 lb (1,792 kg)
Useful load: 3,953 lb (1,793 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 7,903 lb (3,585 kg)
Powerplant: 2 × Turbomeca Arriel 1E2 turboshafts, 738 shp (551 kW) each
Performance

Maximum speed: 145 knots (167 mph, 269 km/h)
Cruise speed: 133 knots (153 mph, 246 km/h)
Range: 370 nmi (426 mi, 685 km)
Service ceiling: 13,181 ft (4,018 m)
Rate of climb: 1,600 ft/min (8.13 m/s)

win?
*
Our PUTD already have AW109LUH, it same funtion like UH72A (H145M)
anyway both is 2 different weapon, different propose, different mission, different tactic, if compare to real attack helicopter, just like compare apple to orange.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 11:56 AM
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 12:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Jul 8 2015, 11:58 AM)
LUH don't have rear clamp shell door, Lakota have it. In case of medevac, bigger space means more stretchers inside Lakota.
the Blackhawk is gas guzzler. hehe
*
well our PUTD LUh no have medevac version, if case emergency need medevac, it use side door . just like Bomba AW109.
this is differences helicopter design culture between AW and Eurocopter Airbus Helicopter. that why most medevac helicopter is using EC135/145.
PUTD/Bomba only use agustawestland helicopter, unless gov make decision buy Airbus helicopter for them.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 12:25 PM
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 12:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Jul 8 2015, 12:24 PM)
last time used Nuri oni for medevac, escorted by Alouette. but Nuri is too big for medevac ooo... need to make clearing the size of Texas to put its wheels down.
like i said earlier, get Lakotas and arm them. tadaa! u got troop carrier, recon, medevac in one bird. small foot print and agile oso.
teh LUH, arm them to the teeth, let it loose on the pilaks on d boats. put wescam mx-15 camera, can become hunter oredi.
*
AW109LUH just like EC139 size。。it can do troop carrier, recon, medevac in one heli too. as EC145 liter bigger, if do medevac cant carry troop too, max 3 personal, mostly 1-2 for doctor, 1 more EMT personal. but Lakotas have dedicated medevac version, which not carry troop or reconn.
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 10:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Jul 8 2015, 08:26 PM)
Looks very utilitarian... But is it combat effective?

Probably not for an offensive monuevere, but what are its defensive capability?

Or with it be constantly escorted by another ship?
*
it just ack as radar station at middle between semporna and Philippine border to surveillance sea surface, which ship high enough, it should be able to monitor range 20-30km for small boat..
it also will be protect by patrol ship together ask as mother ship.
recently already add 30+ small patrol boat at ESSCOM.
waja2000
post Jul 8 2015, 10:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(ks1230 @ Jul 8 2015, 05:03 PM)
so RMN won't be getting any new hulls except for LCS?this is just sad seeing the situation now in SCS..  cry.gif
*
LCS already RMK10 project, but payment will cross 3 RMK. payment should be divided to 8-9 year 2014-2022, cross 3 RMK.
compare to getting 1400 tons corvette which cost close around usd 300 million each, i more prefer priority to get new 500-600 tons patrol boat at lease 16 unit to replace our currently 10 FAC which already use 40+ year,
which very old and not high serviceability. so we can get more small patrol ship and wider our patrol area which much better equipment/facility to serve much better.

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 8 2015, 10:39 PM
waja2000
post Jul 10 2015, 03:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
except Lumit, Sepnaggar and Johor base,
dont why other navy base so small Jetty, went they built they not think of future.
even now also need to double side park.
dont if buy LPD or even Gowind class need to stop-by.

user posted image

Semporna base only allow 600 tons ship coming only due small bayou
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

full already Lumut Navy base, unless BNS move out, it take 50% off navy space.
user posted image

This post has been edited by waja2000: Jul 10 2015, 03:39 PM

14 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0500sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 08:29 AM