no idea...I did not keep track of them daily....jus so happens notice that my china fund dropped by abt 7%,..then I sahaja buat portfolio calculation....

Affinhwang China Growth

search could not get 12 june Nav....
15 nav = 1.0222
16 nav = 0.9939

No-lah...b'cos
1) did not have some much $$...it is 5% of my portfolio
2) currently my greater china region coverage is about 19%
3) this china fund had been up 60% since last year so minus 7% is still ok-lah..
4) it did go up 4% in a day,..so 7% in 2 days is also can...

I think it is 15%
12 June 0.3283
15 June 0.3777

I wrote to EI asked...the CS said correct...and asked for my a/c no:
I wrote again to ask to confirm Nav they no reply....

last time Hwang did a keying in error too...
I asked them..CS said correct
when I asked the CS to confirm again....next day they replied that it was an indeed an input error...

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 18 2015, 10:08 AM

according to Hwang...(for the previous error)
they will honour the sell at higher price and will correct the price to lower one for buyers

whow....come to think about it now...can short sell UTs loh..ha-ha
UTs can short sell -meh?

Last month when my china fund profited 50%...i cut down 50% of my allocation for that fund.....
i thought i was a great fortune teller....
for the next 1 1/2 months it continue to got up by another 17% before cutting off abt 7% in 2 days....
i expected today's nav to be + 1% ....(after 6pm can know)
one thing i realised now...is that i don't feel so sad/worried now when that fund dropped by 7%...

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 18 2015, 03:55 PM

if i am not wrong...i think the fund will follow the benchmark as stated in the factsheet....

no idea....because i did not follow that...as at times the NAV drops or Up does not correlates to both the indexes (in % wise)....

Results of today's actions will only be known tomorrow...
and if today the that fund did not do a +1%....i need to retune my fortune telling skills

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 18 2015, 04:06 PM

Nothing to worry...isn't Algozen ball is pointing to that direction too.

and resulted in a "Balanced" fund?

my wild guess is -4.7 one...
anyway to superimpose the indexes with this
https://my.morningstar.com/ap/quicktake/ove...ceId=0P0000UNMR
or
http://www.trustnet.com/Factsheets/Factshe...e=RTASG&univ=SU

than maybe can see the differences

Thanks for updating us....
FSM is still giving China 5 stars rating....
Japan is still below Fair PE value according to the latest FSM valuation...
FSM is also giving Asia Pac Region 5 stars rating.....

Most importantly Algozen's ball is still heavy onto China....(and I think the ball also does not want to kick into Bolehland)

as for risk or diversification appetite.....I think your FA should know you better and more qualified than me so I cannot comments....(who knows how it will fair)
Good luck....


This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 22 2015, 09:41 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

i think you have your own reasons to keep so many almost similar/overlapping funds...
if you still like to keep it...
i made a wild /quick guess (from the attached)....switching Aberdeen to GTF will still does not change much on the average performance of 1 yr and 2 yrs.......
try play around the figures in the excel file if you want..




Attached thumbnail(s)

Even if the Greeks default, the ownership of Greek debt has substantially shifted from the private sector to the public sector following the debt restructuring that took place in 2012. Currently, the private sector owns an estimated 17% of Greek debt, with the rest of the 83% being held by various public institutions and mechanisms. The largest holder of Greek debt are the Euro-area governments, including the European Financial Stability Facility (which was succeeded by the European Stability Mechanism), one of the many mechanisms to have been setup during the European sovereign debt crisis, which collectively own 62% of Greece's public debt. With the above, it is unlikely that the European financial sector will have to take as big a hit to their balance sheets as they would have had to back in 2011 given that they now own a mere EUR 54.7 billion worth of Greek debt.

Should Greece default and leave the Eurozone, while short term volatility amidst knee jerk reactions could be expected, we do not believe that the departure of Greece will be a material less to the Euro project. With a reported 2014 GDP worth EUR 179 billion, the departure of Greece will result in a loss of 1-2% of Eurozone GDP based off 2014's figures, a figure that is in all honesty unlikely to damage the continent in the long run.

So What Should Investors Do?

While we do expect a positive resolution to the current impasse, investors would also do well to pay heed to valuations of European assets. With government bonds yielding extremely low returns despite having seen a significant spike over the past month or two as seen above (in Chart 2) as the European Central Bank continues with their full-fledged asset purchase programme, even supposedly higher yielding assets such as European high yield bonds (yield-to-worst of 4.22% as of 19 June 2015) do not appear to be offering investors sufficient yield to justify investing in non-investment grade securities as seen in Chart 6.

Given that markets have priced in both this year's (2015) as well as 2016's estimated earnings at the very least as seen in valuations of 16.3X and 14.6X based on 2015 and 2016's estimated earnings respectively as compared against its estimated fair value of 13.5X earnings. In addition, we have yet to see the much hoped for earnings upgrades that should have come on the back on the fulfilment of our expectations of upgrades to GDP growth estimates, which leaves us at the very least cautious towards European equities despite them having the wind of the European Central Bank's asset purchase programme behind their sails,....

As for investors who are cautious on valuations of European equities, reducing their exposure to European equities is another option.

https://secure.fundsupermart.com/main/artic...n-t-They--10489

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 24 2015, 09:51 PM

climb up later?...
I thought they already started climbing for the last 2 to 3 days

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 24 2015, 09:52 PM

unknown to your current % of allocation to Malaysia and China/HK region and your risk preferences
my personal; take is....
stay some in M'sia if you are holding some Kenanga and EI funds.
they are quite resilient for the past months...

go for Asia Pac funds ex: Cimb Asia Pac Dynamic instead of China/HK focus (if one is already holding > 10% in the portfolio)....

"why?" some would ask.....it is b'cos I am more chicken...

This post has been edited by yklooi: Jun 24 2015, 10:15 PM

how much exposure do your portfolio has on CHina/HK?

how much % of
EI small cap,
Kenanga,
CIMB-AsiaPacific Dynamic income,
CIMB-GTF
you already have?