QUOTE(FluffyMonkey @ Jul 29 2016, 11:21 PM)
I even got tricked into upgrading my windows to windows 10 because of some stupid dx12 benchmark preview.
did it work? DX12?Total War : Warhammer
|
|
Jul 30 2016, 12:28 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2016, 05:45 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
DX11 - 66 fps
DX12 - 59 fps With this settings(link). I still get that sub 20 fps even if i lower the graphics setting. Potato CPU = gg. |
|
|
Jul 30 2016, 07:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(FluffyMonkey @ Jul 30 2016, 05:45 AM) DX11 - 66 fps You're using nvidia. Official forums and TWC all reported that nvidia 9 series below does not gain with dx12. Not sure about the new 10xx series.DX12 - 59 fps With this settings(link). I still get that sub 20 fps even if i lower the graphics setting. Potato CPU = gg. It's the assync compute thing. |
|
|
Aug 2 2016, 11:45 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
Daman .. I love SSD. Tak sempat blink already on desktop.
Decided to build a totally new pc so only bought parts now. Not complete yet. |
|
|
Aug 2 2016, 12:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,116 posts Joined: Jun 2014 From: CatCity, Sarawak |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2016, 01:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(yokoloco @ Aug 2 2016, 12:59 PM) Haven't played games yet. Just installing some games last night and only manage to run Rome II benchmark test. Not much changes in fps though but loading is very fast.Mind, that's only installing Steam on SSD but the game data still on my old HDD. Will try Attila (which have the longest load time for me) and Warhammer. If they're still acceptabley fast then I'll leave the data on HDD. If not then maybe I'll reinstall them on SSD too as they're thr games that I'm playing most this time. Can't put all on SSD since I only buy the 240 GB one. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2016, 02:35 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
Just install it on ssd, 240 gb is large enough for all 4 latest Total War titles. I have Shogun 2, Attila and Warhammer(72gb) on my ssd. Total War games requires you to load frequently between campaign map and battles. For other games that only load once, i just install it on hdd. Shogun 2 is the worst, took literally forever to load with hdd.
|
|
|
Aug 2 2016, 02:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(FluffyMonkey @ Aug 2 2016, 02:35 PM) Just install it on ssd, 240 gb is large enough for all 4 latest Total War titles. I have Shogun 2, Attila and Warhammer(72gb) on my ssd. Total War games requires you to load frequently between campaign map and battles. For other games that only load once, i just install it on hdd. Shogun 2 is the worst, took literally forever to load with hdd. Yeah. I will see how my current installation perform. I seldom play Shogun 2 nowadays though I still have an unfinish Otomo campaign. What actually makes me tired of playing Total Wars are not the game themselves, bu the long loading between campaign/battles. This post has been edited by aliesterfiend: Aug 2 2016, 02:50 PM |
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 08:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 11:33 AM
|
|
VIP
1,640 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 11:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 12:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,809 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Jakarta |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,809 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: Jakarta |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 02:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 03:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,137 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(aliesterfiend @ Aug 12 2016, 02:35 PM) Do both for dx11 and dx12. From TWC many are still saying nvidia plays better on dx11 while AMD gains on dx12. will do for DX11acctually i did for rome2 TW similar. just that i cant print screen dunno why turns out black but all the benchmarks says even 1060 better than RX 480 hence went for 1080 then also cos of zotac nostalgic reason, the name 1080 and also the card design... nvr thought it would lag in TW series |
|
|
Aug 12 2016, 03:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,193 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(fujkenasai @ Aug 12 2016, 03:31 PM) will do for DX11 For dx11 yes. AMD driver sucks in dx11. In dx12 I have not seen yet RX480 vs 1060 but certainky beats those 9xx series and lower except 980ti iirc.acctually i did for rome2 TW similar. just that i cant print screen dunno why turns out black but all the benchmarks says even 1060 better than RX 480 hence went for 1080 then also cos of zotac nostalgic reason, the name 1080 and also the card design... nvr thought it would lag in TW series Don't print screen. Use F12. Then get the pic from Steam screenshot folder. Anyway, I may get 470 4GB this month since raya not balik kampung. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_r...ercolor,12.html This post has been edited by aliesterfiend: Aug 12 2016, 04:46 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0372sec
0.35
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 05:52 PM |