Sadly.. if korea partner with russia and their T50 design.. they would have it faster
Military Thread V16
Military Thread V16
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 06:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
Sadly.. if korea partner with russia and their T50 design.. they would have it faster
|
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 07:10 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
The UK's ministry of defence has signed a multi-million pound deal to produce crew-less boats The UK’s defence body has conscripted French defence firm Thales to develop a drone program to defuse underwater mines in a £17 million contract. The 18-month project will see a consortium including BAE systems and led by Thales to create autonomous boats and submarines that can be operated remotely by Royal Navy vessels, improving safety and accuracy. http://www.techworld.com/news/personal-tec...e-deal-3605766/ |
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 07:35 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
DOES IRAN HAVE SECRET NUKES IN NORTH KOREA? ![]() QUOTE Iran has bought a lot with its money. Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, thought to be Tehran’s chief nuclear scientist, was almost certainly in North Korea at Punggye-ri in February 2013 to witness Pyongyang’s third atomic test. Reports put Iranian technicians on hand at the site for the first two detonations as well. The North Koreans have also sold Iran material for bomb cores, perhaps even weapons-grade uranium. The Telegraph reported that in 2002 a barrel of North Korean uranium cracked open and contaminated the tarmac of the new Tehran airport. In addition, the Kim Jong Un regime appears to have helped the Islamic Republic on its other pathway to the bomb. In 2013, Meir Dagan, a former Mossad director, charged the North with providing assistance to Iran’s plutonium reactor. The relationship between the two regimes has been long-lasting. Hundreds of North Koreans have worked at about 10 nuclear and missile facilities in Iran. There were so many nuclear and missile scientists, specialists, and technicians that they took over their own coastal resort there, according to Henry Sokolski, the proliferation maven, writing in 2003. Even if Iran today were to agree to adhere to the Additional Protocol, it could still continue developing its bomb in North Korea, conducting research there or buying North Korean technology and plans. And as North Korean centrifuges spin in both known and hidden locations, the Kim regime will have a bigger stock of uranium to sell to the Iranians for their warheads. With the removal of sanctions, as the P5+1 is contemplating, Iran will have the cash to accelerate the building of its nuclear arsenal. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015...orth-korea.html |
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 10:01 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Russian Military to Unveil New Drones in June – Defense Ministry ![]() MOSCOW (Sputnik) – Russia's new unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), including the Eleron, Orlan-10, Forpost and Gorizont drones, will be unveiled at the inaugural Army-2105 international forum scheduled for June 2015, the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement on Monday. "Complexes with unmanned aerial vehicles, both short and medium range, as well as helicopter drones will be presented as part of the first Army-2015 International Forum," the ministry's press release read. In December 2014, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that the Russian military received 179 new UAVs in 2014, which was "almost as many as we received in all the previous years." The minister's announcement came two weeks after a military unit, to be equipped with Orlan-10 drones, was formed in the Chukotka Autonomous Area, in the Russian Far East, according to Russia's Eastern Military District. Development and production of surveillance drones is one of the top priorities for the Russian Armed Forces. In May 2014, the Russian Defense Ministry said it would spend about $9.2 billion on acquiring new drones and training military personnel to operate UAVs before 2020. More than 1,000 companies and manufacturers are expected to take part in the Army-2015 forum, due to be held in the Moscow region from June 16-19. http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150330/1020207269.html |
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 10:36 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
Sowing The Sea With Fire: The Threat Of Sea Mines ![]() QUOTE So how many ships? Consider China, the worst-case adversary. “They’ve got a lot of weapons, but the means of delivery are relatively few,” said mine warfare expert Scott Truver. By Truver’s estimate, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has 80,000 to 100,000 sea mines. The good news: it’s got only one purpose-built minelayer, which can carry 300 mines at a time. QUOTE If Beijing really wanted to go for broke, though, it could mobilize its largely state-controlled fishing fleet: 30,000 trawlers able to carry 10 mines each and, for defensive mine-laying just off China’s own coast, some 50,000 sailboats that could carry two to five mines. QUOTE China has been careful, in fact, to equip its entire submarine fleet to lay mines. It has about 70 subs able to carry 20 to 30 mines apiece, according to the Navy War College experts — Andrew Erickson, Lyle Goldstein, and William Murray. Between 50 and 60 of those boats are short-range diesels, most of them obsolete and loud. But, at least five Chinese boats are modern, nuclear-powered craft capable of traveling long distances. They would be hard to find. QUOTE The best way to lay mines en masse before anyone can react is to drop them from aircraft. It’s a technique the United States itself used against Imperial Japan almost 70 years ago. Ericson and company estimate that China’s hundred or so H-6 bombers, “though obsolete for many missions,” could carry as many as 18 large mines apiece and indeed have been used for minelaying exercises already. Another hundred JH-7 fighter-bombers could carry 20 smaller mines apiece. QUOTE The famous Strait of Malacca, through which most of East Asia’s oil flows, is only 1.7 miles across. But if it were mined, the Chinese would cut their most direct supply of Persian Gulf oil. In any case, tankers could detour around Sumatra, Java, and Timor, then head north. It would cost considerable time and money to take the long route, but it would hardly cripple seaborne commerce. More reading :- http://breakingdefense.com/2015/03/sowing-...w-to-stop-them/ |
|
|
Mar 30 2015, 11:22 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
China May Build a Naval Base in the South Atlantic ![]() QUOTE The Namibian, a local publication in Namibia, reports obtaining a confidential letter on China’s alleged plan to build a naval base in Namibia’s Walvis Bay. In a Jan. 20 article, it writes the letter was sent from Namibia’s ambassador to China, Ringo Abed, to Namibia’s foreign ministry. The letter states, according to The Namibian, “[Chinese] delegation will visit Namibia … for discussions … on the way forward regarding plans for the proposed naval base in Walvis Bay.” http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1302175-ch...south-atlantic/ |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 12:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
Actually already think very long since last year, maybe no logic
Use Paguan island as front line base (outpost) - Any one got think before Paguan Island (own by MY) as front line military base (outpost)? - seems very good location, but very close to PH border too (also near by 3 small PH island. - Size of Paguan Island about 400 meter x 200 meter size good enough to built proper navy base. if with extra reclamation land size event can go up to 800 x 400 meter. - should easy built a base for 100-200 people. for run 24 monitoring. - install good AESA cost guard radar like Airbus SPEXER 2000 COASTAL, can detect small boat (2 square meter) at 20km, swimmer at 9km. also FLIR, thermal imaging. - defense system can install defense gun, diver detection system to protect base, small defense missile. (like thales LMM) - also can be re-fueling station for patrol boat/MMEA boat,also rest base. - Helipad can be built, also -refuel system, aircraft fuel tank. - lay under water power and communication cable 50km from Lahat Latu and semporna and to Paguan island, or Gen set for 4 unit 150 kw @ 75% Load, about take 1 tons diesel per-day. Wireless point-to-Point as backup comms. - use mini water desalination RO system to get fresh water. - much better than container ship. ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Mar 31 2015, 03:46 PM |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 01:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 31 2015, 12:24 AM) Actually already think very long since last year, maybe no logic all together--- much much more than expensive than a container ship seriously Use Paguan island as front line base - Any one got think before Paguan Island (own by MY) as front line military base? - seems very good location, but very close to PH border too (also near by 3 small PH island. - Size of Paguan Island about 400 meter x 200 meter size good enough to built proper navy base. if with extra reclamation land size event can go up to 800 x 400 meter. - should easy built a base for 100-200 people. for run 24 monitoring. - install good AESA cost guard radar like Airbus SPEXER 2000 COASTAL, can detect small boat (2 square meter) at 20km, swimmer at 9km. also FLIR, thermal imaging. - defense system can install defense gun, diver detection system to protect base, small defense missile. (like thales LMM) - also can be re-fueling station for patrol boat/MMEA boat,also rest base. - Helipad can be built, also -refuel system, aircraft fuel tank. - lay under water power and communication cable 50km from Lahat Latu and semporna and to Paguan island, or Gen set for 4 unit 150 kw @ 75% Load, about take 1 tons diesel per-day. Wireless point-to-Point as backup comms. - use mini water desalination RO system to get fresh water. - much better than container ship. ![]() In fact, pulau laynag layang according to some is also a hard to maintain base |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 02:00 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Feb 2014 |
"Sibutu" island... what an aptly named island.
|
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 07:06 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
KF-X / IF-X.
![]() ![]() This post has been edited by azriel: Mar 31 2015, 09:56 AM |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 01:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
New Pakistani WZ-10 attack helicopter arrive from China
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 01:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
726 posts Joined: Nov 2014 From: Southern Uganda |
|
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 01:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,210 posts Joined: Aug 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 02:16 PM
|
|
Elite
1,157 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 31 2015, 12:24 AM) Actually already think very long since last year, maybe no logic As an outpost at best.Use Paguan island as front line base - Any one got think before Paguan Island (own by MY) as front line military base? - seems very good location, but very close to PH border too (also near by 3 small PH island. - Size of Paguan Island about 400 meter x 200 meter size good enough to built proper navy base. if with extra reclamation land size event can go up to 800 x 400 meter. - should easy built a base for 100-200 people. for run 24 monitoring. - install good AESA cost guard radar like Airbus SPEXER 2000 COASTAL, can detect small boat (2 square meter) at 20km, swimmer at 9km. also FLIR, thermal imaging. - defense system can install defense gun, diver detection system to protect base, small defense missile. (like thales LMM) - also can be re-fueling station for patrol boat/MMEA boat,also rest base. - Helipad can be built, also -refuel system, aircraft fuel tank. - lay under water power and communication cable 50km from Lahat Latu and semporna and to Paguan island, or Gen set for 4 unit 150 kw @ 75% Load, about take 1 tons diesel per-day. Wireless point-to-Point as backup comms. - use mini water desalination RO system to get fresh water. - much better than container ship. ![]() Having a helipad, coastal radar, jeti would be good enough. I prefer we made pulau bum bum as a main base instead. |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 02:20 PM
|
|
Elite
1,157 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
|
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 02:50 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
First Chinese air force drills over 'far offshore' Pacific ![]() BEIJING - China's air force has carried out its first ever military drill over the western Pacific Ocean, state media said, highlighting Beijing's growing military reach. File photo, released by Japan's Defence Ministry, of a Chinese Su-27 fighter jet flying over the East China Sea Several aircraft from China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) on Monday flew over the ocean via the Bashi Channel, which runs between Taiwan and the Philippines, the official Xinhua news agency said. "This is the first time that the PLA Air Force conducted such drills in an airspace far offshore from Chinese coastlines," Xinhua cited army spokesman Shen Jinke as saying. The drill aimed to "level up the PLA Air Force's mobility and combativeness" over the "high seas", Xinhua reported. Territorial tensions have increased in recent years between Beijing and its neighbours around the South China Sea -- which it claims almost in its entirety. Beijing has also been building up its military reach in recent years, with its first aircraft carrier going into service in 2012. China announced an 'Air Defence Identification Zone' (ADIZ) over the East China Sea in 2013, sparking condemnation from Japan and the United States. Japanese media have reported that China is considering a similar zone over the South China Sea, which would be likely to further fan tensions in the region. China has increased its military budget by double digit amounts for several decades, but says the spending is purely defensive and not aimed at other countries. Several southeast Asian nations as well as Japan have boosted their defence budgets and ties with the US, in moves widely seen as reflecting fears about China. The Bashi channel is a waterway between the Philippines' northernmost province of Batanes and Taiwan's Orchid island. Its ownership is disputed. "The drill is not targeted at any certain country or targets and carries no threat against other countries and regions," Xinhua cited Shen as saying. http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/asia/51364...ffshore-pacific |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 03:43 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
PLA chooses A300 hybrid rocket system as contractors compete ![]() The A300 Precision Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System developed by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation. (Internet photo) The People's Liberation Army decided to buy the A300 hybrid rocket system designed by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation at the International Defence Exhibition and Conference held in Abu Dhabi between Feb. 22-26, according to Richard Fisher, a US expert in Chinese military affairs, in a piece for the UK-baed Jane's Defence Weekly on Mar. 28. Source from the Chinese military said the A300 is a two-stage artillery rocket designed based on the current A200 hybrid rocket system. China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation has extended the attack range of the A300 to 290 kilometers from the A200's 200 kilometers. It has a larger engine which can boost an unpowered second stage with vanes for lift and control fins directed by an inertial measuring unit-navigation satellite guidance system, Fisher said. Fisher wrote that a single A300 rocket may be able to carry a 150-kilogram warhead. After the rocket enters service with the PLA, its attacking range may be extended to more than 300 kilometers. It has a 30 to 45 meters circular error probable (CEP) and can engage eight targets in a 20 km by 20 km area, according to its promotional material. Fisher also noticed that several Chinese state-run military hardware manufacturers were competiting against each other in Abu Dhabi. At the expo, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation and China North Industries Corporation were all showing off their new precision-guided long-range artillery rockets that approach the range of short-range ballistic missiles. Fisher believes the PLA is encouraging the competition to accelerate weapons development. "The PLA is happy they have greater choice," an official from the Chinese military told Fisher. http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclas...000076&cid=1101 |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 04:11 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Dec 2014 |
These are the plans for Russia's new third-generation tank
![]() QUOTE Graphic from the Kremlin Tass translated by US Army’s Foreign Military Studies Office provides insight into the kind of vehicle that Russia wants to add to its arsenal. QUOTE One of the most important pieces of technology added to the Armata is the Afganit active protection complex, a system that uses Doppler radar to detect incoming projectiles such as rocket-propelled grenades and anti-tank missiles. Once detected, the active defence launches an interceptor rocket that destroys the incoming projectile. Rossiyskaya Gazeta Online notes that this protection could hypothetically allow the Armata to survive an attack from a US Apache helicopter. But the US Army’s Foreign Military Studies Office takes a more realistic view of the tank’s planned capabilities and writes that the Afganit system would likely only be capable of defending the tank from “shaped-charged grenades, antitank missiles, and subcaliber projectiles.” QUOTE The Armata is also equipped with counter mine defences and a suite of high-resolution video cameras. These cameras would allow the Armata operators to have full 360-degree awareness around the body of the vehicle. Significantly, the Armata’s chassis has been designed to support various other military vehicles. Moscow is reportedly considering using the chassis to also support a range of rocket-prepared flame throwers, self-propelled artillery, recovery vehicles, amphibious transports, and more. More reading :- http://www.businessinsider.com.au/plans-fo...ata-tank-2015-3 |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 04:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 31 2015, 01:40 AM) all together--- much much more than expensive than a container ship seriously that for sure, cost built a proper outpost. In fact, pulau laynag layang according to some is also a hard to maintain base pulau laynag layang to far from KK, Paguan Island near to semporna/LahatLatu, easy to setup infra and supply. event rotation crew. QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 31 2015, 02:16 PM) As an outpost at best. yes, what i means is outpost (small military base), Having a helipad, coastal radar, jeti would be good enough. I prefer we made pulau bum bum as a main base instead. need small group to protect it. worry later got few thousand sulu using alot boat come to attack. so small arm needed. but still need a full Navy base, i still think built in Lahat Latu is good idea, due to water deep enough, can built a complete navy base support all our Navy ship event future LPD (send supply). like at lease half Sepanggar size. also as Command and Monitoring HQ. i think Pulau bum bum have great potential, it is very good as airport (share civilian/military) with 2.5km runway, so i think we still need a Airforce base at Semporna Palau Bum Bum is good location, specially SAR/Attack/transport Helicopter need a base and refueling, and close enough to front line. For navy base Pulau Bum Bum need do some transform, the southern side can't due to large reef, only north side have good deep water suitable as Navy base but need to reclamation land first at reef area (more cost) but still problem is large reef from island . But have other problem in Pulau Bum Bum, that area is main water line, easy get spy by some body, for this reason, Lahat Latu more ideally i think as navy base. This post has been edited by waja2000: Mar 31 2015, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Mar 31 2015, 04:20 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#800
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,167 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 31 2015, 04:11 PM) These are the plans for Russia's new third-generation tank gas turbine with cylinders?.......i'm confused.![]() More reading :- http://www.businessinsider.com.au/plans-fo...ata-tank-2015-3 Gas turbine = jet engine. Cylinder=standard piston engine..... and having all crews in that area with no ability to climb onto the top of the turret seems like a downside for any commander needing to scan the battlefield (unless you trust cameras that much) |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0284sec
0.92
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:37 PM |