Hi just come back from a very busy schedule.
sigh too much project on hand.

anyway I did some reading on previous post.
some ask y not using meko design instead of using dsme.
well it were due to boustead unable to do 2major project at the same time.

As it was expected mica were selected.
well sgpv were design to be light frigates so dun expect much about it.
On the cost and price tags not much we can do on its as some of the money went into upgrading the boustead facilities.
For future upgrade it can utilize the buffer space to install essm or any other long range SAM capability.
as for camm if the development have completed during the announcement back in 2010 it might have been selected instead of mica.

For mmrca I still think we will be better off select gripen leasing option.

Depend on the partnership and also the licence agreement.
I have doubt that boustead can share meko license with nmel or any third party.

Imo, mica deal are pretty much seal off way back 2013.
the only thing missing is loa.
Camm might not even been in the discussion.

Dorang malas nak layan dah lepas baca newspaper 2 hari lepas

Lol.
I mean boustead might have an issue to share or to sell their meko license with nmel or any other third party.

Deal to acquire French Rafale fighters hits rough weather



Deal to acquire French Rafale fighters hits rough weather

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/D...ow/45847253.cms

I believe that pricing include tot/ip and assembly line at home in brazil, but still quiet pricey i personally prefer ASH over gripen for malaysia mrca but dont know lah when we gonna buy been dragging this for long2 time already

That would be a complicated issue to solves for nmel.
besides nmel have close partnership with dsme which is a better deal for nmel interest.

I do hope we make use of meko design unfortunately things dun goes the way we want it to be.
Erieye use software to cover such weaknesses.
it seem that saab wanted to employ GaN tech into erieye radar which greatly improve it capabilities.
Though china aew is cheap there is an issues in datalink.
On procurement china aew will be view as high risk procurement compare to erieye.

----------

As for gripen

Yup the price tag include tot/ip, production kits and few more things.

ASH would be lot cheaper expected flyaway cost less than usd90mil for full spec.
unless we are going for Australian variant which consists of ew that would be above usd100mil.
though I dun think US will sell such variants to Malaysia.

Basically, that what you get for the price you pay. Cant complain

U want 360 coverage, sadly A295 AWACS radar made by jews

mahal tuu...
but more capable than eireye for sure

I not sure how many RMAF specific need. Calling for atreyuangel 

less weedy than wedgetail 

Huh you mean 2nd hand hornet?
I dun think US will sell any of their SH or even legacy hornet.
since their f35 project were so fark up.
Best option we go for lease gripen + erieye if no budget.

u think the anwar petition might affect arms trade between usa and Malaysia

for example if we want to get F18

I dont think USA will change their policy though

just asking

Yup f35 rubbish...

Look like new ash is the only option to keep big bro hapy. Or f16 hahaha