QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Apr 14 2015, 04:02 PM)
there PRC real airfield in making at Spratly yongshu island 
This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 14 2015, 04:36 PM
Military Thread V16
|
|
Apr 14 2015, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#141
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 16 2015, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#142
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(hyperyouth_firepower @ Apr 16 2015, 12:33 PM) speaking of which, did anyone notice that the Russians are developing their next-gen Sukhois based on the Su-30-MKMs as a base, instead of their own base? Russia no money to develop new su-30, maybe enhancement su30 more possible. like change to AESA radar, new engine etc. Did Malaysia's spec outdo their "top spec" which they refused to sell to us in the first place? most money use in Su-50 i think . |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 11:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#143
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 17 2015, 10:54 AM) Dont think that will hapen. We dont usually go bomb another coutry considering how limited our planes are rmn so far only DSME ship is litter big budget .... I believe there a procurment news soon. Most likely rmn or air force Army so far Attack heli is big budget... than MRCA project sure big budget and sure get hoo-haa on politic ... |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#144
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#145
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Apr 17 2015, 02:45 PM) later DCNS QC vs BNS QC on Gowind |
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#146
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 17 2015, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#147
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
#SaudiArabia Army using PLZ-45 (#China Type 88) 155mm SPG w/ PCZ-45 supt veh to shell #Houthi over #Yemen border
i wander solder beside plz45 can tahan sound。。。。 ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 17 2015, 05:15 PM |
|
|
Apr 18 2015, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#148
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
yongshu island runway still in construction date 17 April
![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 18 2015, 01:27 PM |
|
|
Apr 18 2015, 05:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#149
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
new video for MBT3000 ....
|
|
|
Apr 18 2015, 09:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#150
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 08:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#151
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Apr 19 2015, 01:02 AM) This MBT has way too much high-tech gear to simply sell to the kind of countries that are used to basic lower-tier,rough and tumble tanks like the T-72. The technical learning curve would be quite steep, I imagine. Countries with good technical knowhow like Pakistan probably could handle this issue, but I don't see countries like Kenya or Nigeria having the necessary tech to deploy and maintain a fleet of these effectively. just simply to said Noricco design MBT3000 to leading T-90S MBT, Also, it might be cheaper than some tanks, but it's hardly T-72 kind of cheap. Some sources say it will nominally cost about $4.5-5 Million USD per unit. Even later versions of T-72s usually cost something like $1.5-2 Million USD only. MBT2000 still a bit Relatively poor to T-90 MBT. The price also competition with T-90 basically MBT3000 vs T-90 in international market. |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 03:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#152
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 19 2015, 10:00 AM) Smart s mk2 is a search radar and not a muti-mode like herakles radar which can do both search n fire control To counter this, we installed a seperate fire control radar TMX/EO MK 2. Althought it very precise but it capability basically limit it engagement range to 80km at best. Thus, vl mica fit tat space. Iimm we also can install aster system if we install sylver vls A60 and change our fire control radar QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 19 2015, 02:25 PM) Just wait and see which version of slyver vls will be installed that TMX/EO MK 2 also fit 50km ESSM, if change fire control radar, more easy change to herakles radar right? If a50, then there hope for the future upgrade. If not... biasa lah at the end i think mostly A35 Sylver will be install, if lucky possible A43. A50 baiscally no hope. if they think A50 by logic from very early they will select herakles radar. but with sylver A43 still can install CAMM-ER. if use MICA than dont think too much on future upgrade, it will be 20 year later time, by that time not sure what weapon already. (maybe already using LASER) anyway, RMN still not put Air defense for ship as priority it mainly as ASW frigate, as they think get any SAM is ok already. This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 19 2015, 03:54 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 04:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#153
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Apr 19 2015, 03:44 PM) Camm-er no longer quad pack. yeah, camm-er take time for marine versionCamm is more likely if were chosen. Lots of intergration work is required. camm-er is more to land based system. anyway get camm already ok, still better than MICA in range and quantity. if CAMM is Gov got money to get many unit? |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 04:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#154
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
still hope 10 year later we can buy 2-3 AAW frigate.
This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 19 2015, 04:02 PM |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#155
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Apr 19 2015, 04:05 PM) Most likely in several batch. I dun think there will be problem for us to get large amount of its. Given the r-27, r-77, r-73 in the inventory. it wont surprise me if we get large amount of camm if we go for it. QUOTE(yinchet @ Apr 19 2015, 04:08 PM) That have to wait for the gowind class fully deliver. let pray for it. tgpv will start after sgpv fully commission into service. Probably we will be seeing type 26. now left Torpedo model not confirm for Gowind. |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#156
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 06:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#157
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Apr 19 2015, 05:41 PM) Well it is no longer viable to keep in the inventory. yeah i know, mainly limited missile and only 2nd hand missile available in the market if we ever need to buy additional missile. another reasons is service support no longer cheap. Thus when products reach eol, most of the customer would replace it. usually they will still provide support for 5 year after EOL of product ... like other commercial product, give some time for customer get replacement. |
|
|
Apr 19 2015, 07:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#158
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 19 2015, 06:43 PM) Hemm mu90 there the anti torpedo variant also depend ship helicopter, if confirm Gowind helis is ASW helis, than 90% is MU90, more logic ship and ASW helis also use same torpedoMU90 Hard Kill Just there still fear.. it might not work properly especially it from eurotorp. Hahaha Something the Australian highlighted. Another thing is the system for anti torpedo.. This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 19 2015, 07:28 PM |
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 12:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#159
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Apr 19 2015, 11:41 PM) no news yet mean choices are still open. Gowind in ori design already can fit NH90 size 10 tons heli, so no issue fit seahawk or NH90. even can add 1 more S100 uav for our GowindBut there already indication or giveaway what type of heli is being sought after The new gowind deck been extended as well as its hanger. Meaning, the navy is looking for a bigger asw than the current fennec/lynx |
|
|
Apr 20 2015, 09:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#160
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Apr 20 2015, 12:19 AM) depend what you see. I refer to Seahawk romeotechnically yes, one of best ASW heli, it still can use in our Gowind, but not 100% best solution for Gowind. if finally select for Gowind, than mainly due to price is cheaper, still prefer AW159 if cost is main consideration. due to RMN already use AW Super Lynx, maintenance team is here 1) Our Gowind is use Thales ASW system, than Seahawk use own system from L3, means both work independently, can't share data between ship/Heli, if want to install Thales ASW system in Seahawk, than have to pay more for RnD and Integration. than price even expensive than AW159 ASW. (we only need 6) 2. Too small space in seahawk, Seahawk romeo with ASW system there is no space anymore for SAR, crew/goods transport or event Medical assistance, same issue to AW159. remember only 1 heli fit in Gowind, well on US DDG, they have 2 heli hanger , 1 for ASW Heli, other 1 for crew/goods transport and SAR. so i think Gowind probably not get ASW heli, just normal navy heli with search radar and FLIR, mostly Seahwak/AW159. only Nh90NFH fit both,but just too expensive. This post has been edited by waja2000: Apr 20 2015, 01:14 PM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0723sec
0.25
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 03:34 AM |