Fundsupermart.com v9, QE feeds the bull. Ride along...
|
|
 Apr 29 2015, 09:16 PM
|
 
Senior Member
5,143 posts Joined: Jan 2015 
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 29 2015, 08:33 PM) If i do intra switching, do you think it is consider redemtion? yes, I think so... same as last time I do RBH Bond intra switch...kena redemption charges too. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:17 PM
|
Senior Member
4,297 posts Joined: Jul 2009  
|
QUOTE(David83 @ Apr 29 2015, 09:11 PM) How dare you ask Algozen™ for personal gain?   was contemplating pulling out of the stock purchase program lol |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:19 PM
|
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009 
|
QUOTE(river.sand @ Apr 29 2015, 09:49 PM) Once you open a new thread, you can go to drink beer with your Viet friends already mah... I think he is with Viets now!The only other responsibility of a TS is to delete troll/racist posts, but I haven't seen any in this thread. |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009
|
Just check Bloomberg app.. portfolio blood bath!
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,297 posts Joined: Jul 2009
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 29 2015, 09:22 PM) Just check Bloomberg app.. portfolio blood bath!  apa jadi |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013
|
 I am confused here. I am in the middle of reading an article and saw this..."Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns". can someone pls explain this statement in layman term?...  This post has been edited by yklooi: Apr 29 2015, 09:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009
|
QUOTE(IvanWong1989 @ Apr 29 2015, 10:25 PM) apa jadi |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:37 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,259 posts Joined: Sep 2009
|
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 10:33 PM) I am confused here. I am in the middle of reading an article and saw this..."Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns". can someone pls explain this statement in layman term?... I am STEAM jor...  |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:37 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 09:33 PM) I am confused here. I am in the middle of reading an article and saw this..."Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns". can someone pls explain this statement in layman term?... It means that your fund is doing better than the benchmark it uses. Lower loss and/or lower volatility. This post has been edited by David83: Apr 29 2015, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013
|
QUOTE(David83 @ Apr 29 2015, 09:37 PM) Outperform the benchmark doesn't mean your fund must generate a positive return during the period of review. the benchmark is 10% but the fund is only 5%. how can say outperform benchmark? It means that your fund is doing better than the benchmark it uses. Lower loss and/or lower volatility. this is the confusing part for me.... pls elaborate.... |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:42 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 09:41 PM) the benchmark is 10% but the fund is only 5%. how can say outperform benchmark? Can you put the link of your article here?this is the confusing part for me.... pls elaborate.... |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
8,188 posts Joined: Apr 2013
|
QUOTE(David83 @ Apr 29 2015, 09:42 PM) Can you put the link of your article here? sure here it is.....page 2, 5th paragraphs..... https://www.kenangainvestors.com.my/KIB/KIB...ver%20Story.pdf if TRUE, in this is how they interpret outperforming the benchmark......NO WONDER "MOST" Bolehland funds are out performing the benchmarks so frequently......? This post has been edited by yklooi: Apr 29 2015, 09:48 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:49 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 09:46 PM) sure here it is..... page 2, 5th paragraphs..... https://www.kenangainvestors.com.my/KIB/KIB...ver%20Story.pdf QUOTE De Alwis also prefers to focus on coming up with new unit trust funds that look at absolute returns, instead He's trying to explaining the absolute return concept. Not sure what he meant but he's definitely missed some details in the example.of relying on benchmarking as a performance indicator. Many unit trusts use benchmarks based on stock or bond market indices. In contrast, funds that look at absolute returns are more concerned about the total returns they receive from the assets they are invested in. "Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns. "We have come to a stage where this generation of investors are educated and are not looking for superstar funds or a one-year wonder. They just want it to be consistent. That is why we ensure that our funds have [steady] three, five and 10year records." This post has been edited by David83: Apr 29 2015, 09:50 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:50 PM
|
Senior Member
16,872 posts Joined: Jun 2011
|
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0177sec
 0.60
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:01 PM |
Quote